Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
society

Richer countries have less faith in vaccines


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

2 hours ago, Buddy said:

Not surprising, the privileged have more leisure time to delve in psuedo-education echo chambers. For third world countries, our first world bubbles are not an option. They have no choice but see and live the ugly consequences of lack of healthcare every day. 

and this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can manage to keep more dumb people alive

ice heard one side from above
Link to post
Share on other sites

Versace

Guys not to sound Dumb, but I remember getting vaccinated when I was a kid. Do I need to get any vaccines as an adult? Sorry if its an ignorant question :selena:

Link to post
Share on other sites

FfFfFfFF
10 minutes ago, Versace said:

Guys not to sound Dumb, but I remember getting vaccinated when I was a kid. Do I need to get any vaccines as an adult? Sorry if its an ignorant question :selena:

There are certain situations where a vaccine is nedded (if you travel to a tropical country, if you interact with a lot of wild animals, when you get bite by a dog/ cat/ other animal or when you hurt yourself with something rusted etc) but other than than no vaccine is mandatory for an adult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
8 hours ago, homomo said:

It’s important to have herd immunity though. Like, if all people in a given area are vaccinated against a disease or virus, it then dissipates and becomes extinct over time. 

Like, Polio was basically non-existent in North America for decades. But since the anti-vax movement started a few years ago, there have been hundreds of cases reported. 

The most important thing to know about diseases, viruses, bacteria, etc is that it won’t infect everyone the same. Some people could just be carriers of the disease (doesn’t affect them, but they spread it on to others people). But then the next person will most likely have a severe reaction to it entering their body, which could possibly cause their eventual death. And this is why vaccination is so important for everyone.

like, a child in the USA caught the bubonic plague last year for goodness sake. That hasn’t been around for centuries! 

Are we even vaccinated against the bubonic plague tho? I've never heard of being vaccinated for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
8 hours ago, Buddy said:

Not surprising, the privileged have more leisure time to delve in psuedo-education echo chambers. For third world countries, our first world bubbles are not an option. They have no choice but see and live the ugly consequences of lack of healthcare every day. 

I mean there may be a reason for that. Don't get me wrong I'm not anti Vax

 

But doctors in my 1st world nations are known to prescribe more meds than is really necessary and meds do have side effects that sometimes aren't worth it in cases you don't really need it

 

Also all the time after many years they discover certain medications or treatments have likely links to issues later in life that before they weren't aware and by the time ppl develop these issues, too late!

 

So some ppl have Reservations with health care and don't trust it 100% blindly

 

I for one dont

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

homomo
1 hour ago, Economy said:

Are we even vaccinated against the bubonic plague tho? I've never heard of being vaccinated for it

No; however, antibiotics are used to treat the plague. It's still the same concept though. Some parents don't "agree" with antibiotics, even if their child literally has an infection that can be cured with them.

The only difference between taking antibiotics and getting a vaccine is that only take antibiotics when you already have the infection. Unlike vaccines, antibiotics can strengthen a bacteria (or even viruses in some cases) to super bugs if taken without a bacteria infection, or a dose hasn't been completed. Basically, the bacteria can build up a nice resistance to antibiotics (if not completed or used properly); which in turn makes the offspring of that bacteria resistant to treatment.

This basically means incurable diseases until a new antibiotic is developed to fight off the new strain.

 

0110100001100101011011000110110001101111
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
37 minutes ago, homomo said:

No; however, antibiotics are used to treat the plague. It's still the same concept though. Some parents don't "agree" with antibiotics, even if their child literally has an infection that can be cured with them.

The only difference between taking antibiotics and getting a vaccine is that only take antibiotics when you already have the infection. Unlike vaccines, antibiotics can strengthen a bacteria (or even viruses in some cases) to super bugs if taken without a bacteria infection, or a dose hasn't been completed. Basically, the bacteria can build up a nice resistance to antibiotics (if not completed or used properly); which in turn makes the offspring of that bacteria resistant to treatment.

This basically means incurable diseases until a new antibiotic is developed to fight off the new strain.

 

I have mixed feelings about antibiotics

 

If they are really necessary they should be used but I also think they should only be used when it's a very dangerous infection that can turn ugly or when an infection isn't going away on its own

 

Cuz it's not just about bacteria building resistance... Antibiotics also wreck havock on your intestines micro biome and that has potential bad side effects

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...