Morphine Prince 109,654 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ego Slayer 402 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Oh Jesus, gross Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsches 17,550 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 That's illegal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 23 minutes ago, tomsches said: That's illegal its not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,654 Posted June 13, 2019 Author Share Posted June 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, Faysalaaa said: its not It is. Please don’t start spewing misinformation. “Foreign nationals may not make — and no one may ‘solicit, accept, or receive’ from them — 'a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value’ or ‘an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election.’ 52 U.S.C. § 30121(a)(1)(A), (a)(2)." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Just now, Morphine Prince said: It is. Please don’t start spewing misinformation. If a random foreign person gives the president real information about something and he looks at it, its not illegal. I am not spewing misinformation, I actually looked it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,654 Posted June 13, 2019 Author Share Posted June 13, 2019 Just now, Faysalaaa said: If a random foreign person gives the president real information about something and he looks at it, its not illegal. I am not spewing misinformation, I actually looked it up. Read my edited post. It’s illegal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Othon 34,299 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 He's so f*cking stupid. He just says all of this like it isn't a big deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsTommyBitch 12,640 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Lol. Ofc he would. There'll be election interference in 2020 guaranteed, and it'll go to Trump. 私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: Read my edited post. It’s illegal. That is about money and personal gains Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,654 Posted June 13, 2019 Author Share Posted June 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Faysalaaa said: That is about money and personal gains Please come back to me when you actually read the statute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sepsami 20,953 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 he literally looks like an orange raccoon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: Please come back to me when you actually read the statute. I did read it and it only talks about money.. Muller went saw the evidence of the Trump tower meeting which is taking information from foreigners yet it was never used as a reason to impeach him because its not illegal. Hilary Clinton retained a law firm in 2016 that contracted Christipher Steele a foreign intelligence operative to gather dirt on Trump. And Steele got this information from the Russian Government. This is all public information yet Hilary is not persecuted because it is legal. So if a Canadian has proof that Trump colluded with Russia and Hilary listened to their message, that is illegal? Obviously not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,654 Posted June 13, 2019 Author Share Posted June 13, 2019 Just now, Faysalaaa said: I did read it and it only talks about money.. Muller went saw the evidence of the Trump tower meeting which is taking information from foreigners yet it was never used as a reason to impeach him because its not illegal. Hilary Clinton retained a law firm in 2016 that contracted Christipher Steele a foreign intelligence operative to gather dirt on Trump. And Steele got this information from the Russian Government. This is all public information yet Hilary is not persecuted because it is legal. So if a Canadian has proof that Trump colluded with Russia and Hilary listened to their message, that is illegal? Obviously not. It does not only talk about money. Reading comprehension is important. Re-read. Also, I didn’t pull that law out of my butt. Mueller addressed it in the report. He could not prove INTENT. Accepting intel in this manner is still illegal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said: It does not only talk about money. Reading comprehension is important. Re-read. Also, I didn’t pull that law out of my butt. Mueller addressed it in the report. He could not prove INTENT. Accepting intel in this manner is still illegal. Then all the progressive shows im watching and following are lying? im not getting my info from right wingers! ill have to wait till tomorrow to see what other people say to make sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.