Ayria 463 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: Just let him/her be. It’s obvious they are not here for right discussion and they won’t read what you have to say. I myself gave them facts that rule out their “he’s guilty” arguments but he/she just chose not to read them because they are published on MJ fan website. What more do I need to tell you? Just let them think whatever they want to. You really thought you did something with this statement? MJ fan websites obviously aren’t going to be balanced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FadMadonsterStan 578 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Thank you for posting this! It really shows that the French media is a lot more fair then the American media, showing both sides of the story instead of jumping to conclusions, which people should acknowledge at least Don't go for second best, baby Put your love to the test Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Ayria said: You really thought you did something with this statement? MJ fan websites obviously aren’t going to be balanced. If you took the time to read it you would see that it actually is pretty balanced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 20 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: If you took the time to read it you would see that it actually is pretty balanced. No, a balanced view of a man who sleeps with underage boys behind locked doors is that he is a pedophile. No one would defend that behavior if it was not MJ. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 41,968 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 ugh when will this controversy die down? it’s literally just a pathetic feel good parade for MeToo crusaders, but instead of looking like moral idols, y’all look more like clowns bc you’re fighting for something that can’t be solved. he’s dead. he can’t go to jail. don’t waste so much energy into something that’ll never get justice/closure-or do. snap off I guess. MJDaily can sleep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 33 minutes ago, Ayria said: No, a balanced view of a man who sleeps with underage boys behind locked doors is that he is a pedophile. No one would defend that behavior if it was not MJ. That’s “balanced view”? lmao. Okay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 15 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: That’s “balanced view”? lmao. Okay. Yeah, can you think of another example of a grown man sleeping with boys “innocently”, buying them jewelry “innocently”, and abandoning them after puberty “innocently”. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regina George 59,387 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Ayria said: Yeah, can you think of another example of a grown man sleeping with boys “innocently”, buying them jewelry “innocently”, and abandoning them after puberty “innocently”. yea yes and yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 58 minutes ago, ReginaGeorge said: yea yes and yes What examples do you have? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fish 6,086 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 15 hours ago, nicolasrumet said: Because as the specialist in the debate says, money can't repair sexual assault victims. So filing a lawsuit for money against a dead man (who isn't even here to be ruled against in court) is a far cry from seeking justice. Â you know its possible to sue someone for money AND be a sexual assault victim. those are not mutually exclusive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fresco 1,688 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Robson and Safechuck are the greediest people on this planet, imo. They sued for $1.5 billion. That's $1,500,000,000.00 lawsuit against the estate/companies of a dead man that they previously liked very much. (I don't have details of the lawsuit) Their enormous greed has turned me off from any interest in or sympathy for them for what they may have experienced. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/joevogel/2019/01/29/what-you-should-know-about-the-new-michael-jackson-documentary/amp/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickens in Malibu 7,873 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Fish said: you know its possible to sue someone for money AND be a sexual assault victim. those are not mutually exclusive. If you do and especially when you don't have concrete evidence, then you'll have to accept a cloud of doubt surrounding your motive, especially when the amount at stake is over a billion or something? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fish 6,086 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 50 minutes ago, nicolasrumet said: If you do and especially when you don't have concrete evidence, then you'll have to accept a cloud of doubt surrounding your motive, especially when the amount at stake is over a billion or something? I understand, but your post implied that because he is seeking money from a dead man, therefore the only consequential conclusion is that he is not seeking justice, but only money. Which again, like half of your statements, is logically flawed from a pure reason and logic perspective. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 22 hours ago, Ayria said: You really thought you did something with this statement? MJ fan websites obviously aren’t going to be balanced. I gave you a wikipedia link of the trial Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayria 463 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 3 minutes ago, kyanewest said: I gave you a wikipedia link of the trial I’ve given you both Bill Dworin confirming Jordan’s drawing matched the photos of MJ and Richard Gardner finding the claims believable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.