LetsGetHigh 52,683 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Instead of studying I am thinking of how they could make Shallow sound as good in 90 seconds as in its original length. Here: https://picosong.com/wuvGA/ Focused more on trimming whatever was sung by Bradley and then repeated by Gaga. Listen to see if AHHHhhhhHhHhHhHhH made the cut. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality 66,396 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 I actually think that this would be a perfect way to cut the song. 🃏🖤👹 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolai Barrow 1,337 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 That would actually work. I hope they do something like this if they do have to keep it to 90 seconds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlopSlurper 34,336 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 So the song goes from being a conversation between a struggling artist, and a rising star, to a rushed mess? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetsGetHigh 52,683 Posted February 1, 2019 Author Share Posted February 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, FlopSlurper said: So the song goes from being a conversation between a struggling artist, and a rising star, to a rushed mess? It aint my fault, I'm just making a concept of what the Academy is ordering. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlopSlurper 34,336 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Just now, A Dull Boy said: It aint my fault, I'm just making a concept of what the Academy is ordering. what I'm saying is that it doesn't sound "as good", yes they required that but it does sound rushed, so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adarsh Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Amazing work Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustTea 3,061 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 That instrumental part in the middle was kinda off and unnecessarily long tbh. Otherwise it could work Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFame Monster 8,727 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 It feels wrong, I think it'd be okay cutting it short, but the song still needs both choruses. Bradley's verse Gaga Bradley Pre Chorus Chorus Bridge Chorus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanne Godijn 2,203 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Im sorry no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VoldeLorde2 8,389 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 I liked it. I think this is something I'll be happy about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetsGetHigh 52,683 Posted February 1, 2019 Author Share Posted February 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sanne Godijn said: Im sorry no How would you crop it to be 90 seconds? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanne Godijn 2,203 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Just now, A Dull Boy said: How would you crop it to be 90 seconds? I just gave my opinion thats all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetsGetHigh 52,683 Posted February 1, 2019 Author Share Posted February 1, 2019 Just now, Sanne Godijn said: I just gave my opinion thats all I know that, I'm not trying to attack you or anything. I'm just genuinely interested in what people would remove from the song to cut it down to 90 seconds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biden Harris 2024 1,451 Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 Bad idea to cut any performance that short. Better to not do it at all. Shallow has a story, a narrative, that you follow that mirrors the movie. Cut it short and it loses it's meaning, it's impact. I would never condense my music to "fit" into a time slot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.