FfFfFfFF 54,014 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 59 minutes ago, lego said: How is that a valid point? Saying rapists should be free to rape - that’s better than making a mistake?? How about none of these things are better than the other, but one is clearly more harmful to society? And that one is letting rapist go free (I’m not just talking about this case). All of you who agree with that ffff statement, in general, seem to sympathize more with the accused than the victim. I wonder why? Were you falsely accused before? Are you afraid of being accused? There’s definitely emotional involvement. And Kesha never actually wanted dr.Luke to be imprisoned, she wanted people to believe her so she’d be free from him, not forced to work in that toxic environment. So you should forget about “innocent man going to jail” in this case. You are decomposing what I said in order to try to make me look bad. Yes, when there is no proof, that certain accused person should not be sent to jail because there is the possibility to be inoccent. It's better for him to live free even if he's guilty than to be emprisoned while inoccent. This is how the juridic system should work. Both options are bad but the injustice of sending someone inoccent to prison should be avoided at all costs. Give me a solid contra-argument to this. I think the fact that you are calling us "emotionally involved" is ironic. Believe me or not, I like Kesha. Just now, Runway said: I-- I appreciate your input. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runway 27,876 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 1 minute ago, FfFfFfFF said: You are decomposing what I said in order to try to make me look bad. Yes, when there is no proof, that certain accused person should not be sent to jail because there is the possibility to be inoccent. It's better for him to live free even if he's guilty than to be emprisoned while inoccent. This is how the juridic system should work. Both options are bad but the injustice of sending someone inoccent to prison should be avoided at all costs. Give me a solid contra-argument to this. I think the fact that you are calling us "emotionally involved" is ironic. Believe me or not, I like Kesha. I appreciate your input. I was just so appalled that someone would think that and say it for everyone to see but you do you sis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoHeaven23 35,007 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 What i want to know is why was Gaga at Dr Luke's house? They've never collabed from what i know of Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALGAYDO 26,390 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 6 minutes ago, DiscoHeaven23 said: What i want to know is why was Gaga at Dr Luke's house? They've never collabed from what i know of Label probably forced her to go and meet with him to see if they'd *click* enough to do business Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leblanc 2,246 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 25 minutes ago, FfFfFfFF said: You are decomposing what I said in order to try to make me look bad. Yes, when there is no proof, that certain accused person should not be sent to jail because there is the possibility to be inoccent. It's better for him to live free even if he's guilty than to be emprisoned while inoccent. This is how the juridic system should work. Both options are bad but the injustice of sending someone inoccent to prison should be avoided at all costs. Give me a solid contra-argument to this. I think the fact that you are calling us "emotionally involved" is ironic. Believe me or not, I like Kesha. I appreciate your input. I know i'm randomly jumping in here but I find this all really interesting. I appreciate the debate and discussion going on here because it's challenging and that's how we better understand circumstances like this and make progress. I don't know enough about law or these cases to form a valid opinion but I just wanted to say your idea idea is quite interesting and i'm at work just thinking through my personal feelings on this. Anyway I do see your point though. However I feel like people are quick to judge what you are saying because it can sound bad at face value. But just know I think you presented a very interesting perspective that's opened my eyes to challenge my own views. For me it's a very lesser of two evils situation and everyone is going to have different perspectives on this. No one should be rude to you though I always let the good ones go Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wet Fire 5,687 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 And that's how you do it !! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 They hired a female lawyer to tear a female survivor down? Wow. She really should be ashamed of herself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoshLife 16,842 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 "Well, when men assault women, they don't invite people over to watch." You go, Gaga. I love you and support you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuckles 2,544 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 We will always STAN. She is IT, there is no one above her... and she has the statements to back it up. Wonder how all of the people dragging her for the R.Kelly/DWUW a weeks ago are feeling now... of course, this will not get to their eyes... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reid LePage 4,773 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 8 hours ago, ZiggyZiggs said: It literally doesn’t but go off okay well how am i wrong sis? you must be a kesha fan bc u blind.mp3 as fug bby give me the tea, feed me the real tea and send receipts while you're at it xo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochestrMonstr 2,274 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 4 hours ago, lego said: How is that a valid point? Saying rapists should be free to rape - that’s better than making a mistake?? How about none of these things are better than the other, but one is clearly more harmful to society? And that one is letting rapist go free (I’m not just talking about this case). All of you who agree with that ffff statement, in general, seem to sympathize more with the accused than the victim. I wonder why? Were you falsely accused before? Are you afraid of being accused? There’s definitely emotional involvement. And Kesha never actually wanted dr.Luke to be imprisoned, she wanted people to believe her so she’d be free from him, not forced to work in that toxic environment. So you should forget about “innocent man going to jail” in this case. Obviously it's not okay for rapists to be free to rape. As I said above, I believe Kesha, and I hope someday there is a better scientific way to prove people guilty/innocent in sexual assault cases. I feel horrible for any victim of sexual assault that there usually is no way to prove this type of thing. I don't think its ok for rapists to be free, but I also don't think it's ok for innocent people to be accused in any type of crime, not just this case. Both are terrible situations. I don't see why I would need to have been accused of anything myself to think that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demoncore 475 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 This thread is the reason why we need the “excuse me no” reaction back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zilla 13,343 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 I can just picture her going "don't you dare roll your eyes at me!" and giving them the death stare. GET IT GIRL. 𝙸'𝚖 𝚊 𝚓𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carpet Shark 223 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 Wasn't this case a civil case, though? There would be no chance of anyone being locked up as a direct result of it. What's more, it would be judged on the 'preponderance of evidence' basis instead of 'beyond reasonable doubt'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chromadica 636 Posted January 30, 2019 Share Posted January 30, 2019 8 hours ago, FfFfFfFF said: It's better to have someone guilty free than someone inoccent in prison. You could have made a valid point without saying something this ridiculous and blatantly provocative. These situations are both major failures of justice and ARE NOT comparable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.