Hallonkola 508 Posted September 4, 2018 Share Posted September 4, 2018 I have tried to watch the 1976-version three times but failed 1/4 into the movie. I thought it was boring and slow, and I didn't like the music either... And I usually don't have any problems watching slow paced movies, but this one just felt so uninteresting and I didn't care for the characters or anything really. But I haven't given the other ones a try yet (if I do). I think this new version of the movie looks fresh though, and I'm very excited to see what Gaga and Bradley will bring to it. I had never heard of 'A star is born' before Gaga was attached to it, so I think it will bring a light to the story for a new generation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lana Del Gay 853 Posted September 4, 2018 Share Posted September 4, 2018 A Subpar Is Born That rah rah bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 109,386 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 I did, IMHO those past versions are not very watchable. It needed some fine tune. And Looks like Bradley did a good fine tune now from how I read these reviews. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢, 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯'𝘵 (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodyjack 794 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 4 hours ago, That J said: I've seen them. The one with Streisand can be a tad ...whatever lol. I just dont think she was believable as a rock star personally but it's not bad. The Judy Garland version is lovely if you can handle the pace. I sometimes love old movies like that tho. Gone With The Wind, for example. Pacing is different but if you give it time, it's great. Yaaaaas I love gone with the wind and the Judy version Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.