bitchimtrying 2,495 Posted August 27, 2018 Author Share Posted August 27, 2018 Just now, theorist said: If she calls the new album LG6 (and used to call Joanne LG5), then the only way that's possible is with TFM being an independent album. TF is LG1, TFM is LG2, BTW is LG3, AP is LG4, and Joanne is LG5. C2C is a joint album so it isn't LG6, but LGTB1 Honey, you know what, I don't have time for this mess.... I have a life....I have a job.....I clearly have a better outlook on WHATEVER is going on here.....so with that in mind, good day and enjoy staying ignorant and wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theorist 1,161 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, bitchimtrying said: Honey, you know what, I don't have time for this mess.... I have a life....I have a job.....I clearly have a better outlook on WHATEVER is going on here.....so with that in mind, good day and enjoy staying ignorant and wrong. gosh you're so defensive lol edit: and for the record, you were the one who first asked so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitchimtrying 2,495 Posted August 27, 2018 Author Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Admin said: Just letting you know that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone because it doesn't look like you're aware of that. Wikipedia is looked over constantly by administrators who are contacted by representatives of media outlets/PR companies/industry executives. If that page was wrong it would have been change after the 9 years that The Fame Monster has been released, but it hasn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theorist 1,161 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, bitchimtrying said: Wikipedia is looked over constantly by administrators who are contacted by representatives of media outlets/PR companies/industry executives. If that page was wrong it would have been change after the 9 years that The Fame Monster has been released, but it hasn't. i'm sorry but didn't you have a life and a job to attend? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin 24,441 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 minute ago, bitchimtrying said: Wikipedia is looked over constantly by administrators who are contacted by representatives of media outlets/PR companies/industry executives. That's not true. The reason The Fame Monster is listed as an EP is because it technically falls under the EP category and the Wikipedia is very strict with technicalities. But it has nothing to do with what Gaga or Interscope considers it to be or not be. There's no way to find out what The Fame Monster is considered as contractually because such things are not made public, but neither evidence (the fact that Interscope submitted it for Album of the Year at the Grammys and it got nominated), nor common sense (the fact that it was treated just like any other album) are in favor of your argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryanripley 86,575 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 i wish admin would clock me https://goo.gl/xMgMvJ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitchimtrying 2,495 Posted August 27, 2018 Author Share Posted August 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, theorist said: gosh you're so defensive lol edit: and for the record, you were the one who first asked so Just now, theorist said: i'm sorry but didn't you have a life and a job to attend? (But with all seriousness, this is all just a matter of difference of opinion girl..It's all love from me, we can both have our own opinion 💗) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitchimtrying 2,495 Posted August 27, 2018 Author Share Posted August 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Admin said: That's not true. The reason The Fame Monster is listed as an EP is because it technically falls under the EP category and the Wikipedia is very strict with technicalities. But it has nothing to do with what Gaga or Interscope considers it to be or not be. There's no way to find out what The Fame Monster is considered as contractually because such things are not made public, but neither evidence (the fact that Interscope submitted it for Album of the Year at the Grammys and it got nominated), nor common sense (the fact that it was treated just like any other album) are in favor of your argument. Me: Thinking I have a reasonable and logical argument. @Admin : Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 117,262 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 ASIB is not "hers", it's a soundtrack, WB has more shares on it than Interscope, but Interscope is the one who will distribute it.. So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feline 622 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 55 minutes ago, bitchimtrying said: Wikipedia is looked over constantly by administrators who are contacted by representatives of media outlets/PR companies/industry executives. If that page was wrong it would have been change after the 9 years that The Fame Monster has been released, but it hasn't. Here’s Gaga back in the day presenting The Fame Monster as an album an explaining the releases Who cares what Wikipedia says when Gaga herself consider TFM as her second album Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes 561 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 1 hour ago, theorist said: gaga didn't sing new tracks for those nor worked in them so no 1 hour ago, Arturo said: No. It has to be new songs Oh cause I remember Selena Gomez released a "greatest hits" album to end her contract with Hollywood Records and sign with Interscope Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joannesrats 26 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 C2C was released through Tony's record, iirc. Also, the ASIB soundtrack should be released through Warner Bros. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gay 1,370 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Arturo said: I dont care what anyone says, Gaga renewing with Interscope was the best decision. Its still one of the better labels (only behind Republic probably) and I still feel even if she went to a “better” label they would have put her on the back burner. Interscope and her have history. atlantic is better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arturo 40,746 Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 11 minutes ago, yes said: Oh cause I remember Selena Gomez released a "greatest hits" album to end her contract with Hollywood Records and sign with Interscope But it had new material, The Heart Wants What It Wants. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.