stricklandbanks 0 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 This. It made me laugh how they said it outshines the music... I don't remember her performing in the meat dress. Hm. Thats why shes wearing the meat dress at the BTW Ball... It's not the same dress. Its not even real meat, but ofcourse she wears the same clothes at her tour :confuse: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VFD 57 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 The article doesn't really focus on Gaga. It brings some interesting takes on how people perceive the fact some artist are all about performance show, and not just the music. While some might say it diminishes the musical factor, others believe it complements it. Didn't know those differences between rock and pop. Very interesting! Gaga is all about image, but she has the talent to back it up/complement it. :yes: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALX 170 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 They make it sound like she got instantly famous, which could be seen as a generalization I guess. But she did work her way up, and I don't like how this article suggests that she didn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CannaeDrive 3,412 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I just read that, just close-minded people unable to appreciate that an artist can be more than just a musician or a singer, good at only one thing. Many great artists were multi-talented and versatile, look at Picasso or Leonardo Da Vinci. Besides, they needed to write about Gaga, and put her picture on the front page, to give that lame article any relevancy. :nails: "Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Americano 31,061 Posted July 28, 2012 Author Share Posted July 28, 2012 They make it sound like she got instantly famous, which could be seen as a generalization I guess. But she did work her way up, and I don't like how this article suggests that she didn't. That's what bothered me the most. They basically said she was a Youtube sensation.. When she's said OVER AND OVER in TONS of interviews that she worked her ass off and went through the lowest ranks of the industry up to the very top. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boysboysboys 278 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Clearly a misinformed article. And, AGAIN, further evidence that the Haus and Interscope/Universal have given zero attention to her press. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
InGagzWeTrust 0 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I just read that, just close-minded people unable to appreciate that an artist can be more than just a musician or a singer, good at only one thing. Many great artists were multi-talented and versatile, look at Picasso or Leonardo Da Vinci. Besides, they needed to write about Gaga, and put her picture on the front page, to give that lame article any relevancy. :worship2: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boysboysboys 278 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Another thing: the writer has no clear definition of what an artist is. Is pure singing and songwriting the art, and the image not? Can't it be both? Or even either way? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphaz 7,934 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 stay pressed, irrelevant b---hes "we don't care what people say, we know the truth, enough with this horse****" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopRunTheWorld 0 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 :nails: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalameet 4 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 People will always doubt her artistry and question if its real art, attention seeking, etc and thats something I actually love. She writes her songs and she worked to get her fame. She's hardworking. So I don't see the problem in calling her a real artist. If she wasn't about the music she would hire songwriters to do all the work for her and she would lipsynch every performance. Obviously Gaga loves what she's doing and she's trying to give things a purpose. To me, that can be art. We can have many different artists, thats the beauty of the whole thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boysboysboys 278 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Bry, please re-edit the title. The article is a biased question, but still a question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
la fama 13 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 These guys need to look up the words artist and art in the dictionary tbh :nails: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHGUY 230 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I had no idea CNN were such experts on music :derpga: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireGrin 85 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 This is so ignorant :smh: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.