Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
politics

Trump threatens Russia/Syria


FATCAT

Featured Posts

andreas85

It has never even been proven that Assad committed those attacks, just like it was never proven that Saddam Hussein had  weapons of mass destruction. Of course, such things as facts have never stopped US and it's allies starting new wars or escalating ongoing conflicts.  Of course it is possible that Assad did those things he's accused of but it is also possible that Israel and US are the guilty ones which wouldn't be surprising. Israel has launched countless strikes in Syria and committed several war crimes and US-led forces has also used chemical weapons in Iraq and Syria:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/06/09/u-s-led-forces-appear-to-be-using-white-phosphorous-in-populated-areas-in-iraq-and-syria/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.31d0f0f8dab8

Of course it is understandable that American warmongers are angry because they believe that only US and its allies has right to use chemical weapons and carry out war crimes. Also, US government talking about "retaliation" is just propaganda. Attack against Assad wouldn't be "retaliation", it would be just another unnecessary attack that would escalate the war in Syria thus make everything worse. Americans have nothing to worry though about because USA is the most secured country in the history of the world but innocent Syrian civilians have a lot to worry about, like mindless bombings by US-led forces and terrorist groups supported by US and other foreign forces.

Why typical US foreign policies are extremely harmful:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
FATCAT
2 minutes ago, andreas85 said:

It has never even been proven that Assad committed those attacks

That's just an outright lie. 

"By this point, the military options have been winnowed to a Tomahawk cruise missile strike at Al Shayrat airfield. American intelligence has tracked the planes that carried out the attacks and determined that they were Syrian government warplanes that had departed from and returned to the base."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/us/politics/syria-strike-trump-timeline.html

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Melech
1 hour ago, hunty said:

please tell me you don't actually believe this? you strike me as a lot smarter. sarcasm does a better job at highlighting hypocrisy than a politically correct dialect that means nothing. 

Do you think USA shouldn't have intervened in WW2?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sirius094

First North Korea, now Syria... Trump is really trying to start a WW3, isn't he? :wtf: The US should mind their own business!

Pem Pem Perempem Pem Pem Pem
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
9 minutes ago, Sirius094 said:

The US should mind their own business!

Or maybe tyrannical governments shouldn't be morally corrupt. 

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sirius094
9 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Or maybe tyrannical governments shouldn't be morally corrupt. 

There will always be tyrannical governments morally corrupt, but this doesn't mean that US needs to be nosy and start a war for whatever reason ;) 

Pem Pem Perempem Pem Pem Pem
Link to post
Share on other sites

Melech
3 minutes ago, Sirius094 said:

There will always be tyrannical governments morally corrupt, but this doesn't mean that US needs to be nosy and start a war for whatever reason ;) 

Soooo, USA shouldn't have intervened in WW2?

Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
9 minutes ago, Sirius094 said:

There will always be tyrannical governments morally corrupt, but this doesn't mean that US needs to be nosy and start a war for whatever reason ;) 

Are you literally saying that the world should just leave dictators/war criminals to do their thing? It's not the US being nosy, it's the US and other allies trying to protect people from their own government, many of which they had not voice in, or no longer have a voice in. 

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
8 minutes ago, Melech said:

Soooo, USA shouldn't have intervened in WW2?

 

44 minutes ago, Melech said:

Do you think USA shouldn't have intervened in WW2?

I need someone to answer so I can witness this, I need some hot tea in my life. Spill it on them, Simon!

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

ryanripley
13 minutes ago, Sirius094 said:

There will always be tyrannical governments morally corrupt, but this doesn't mean that US needs to be nosy and start a war for whatever reason ;) 

lmao

https://goo.gl/xMgMvJ
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sirius094
1 minute ago, Melech said:

Soooo, USA shouldn't have intervened in WW2?

Yes. Because USA intervened only for its interests. USA gained a lot with the WW2, now Europe is basically at their orders and it's plenty of american bases on its soil. Let's not act like USA is a savior or something else, they were exclusively thinking to their interests :air:

Pem Pem Perempem Pem Pem Pem
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sirius094
6 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Are you literally saying that the world should just leave dictators/war criminals to do their thing? It's not the US being nosy, it's the US and other allies trying to protect people from their own government, many of which they had not voice in, or no longer have a voice in. 

Really? But I didn't see any other government threatening with bombs or missiles :laughga: only Trump.

Pem Pem Perempem Pem Pem Pem
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
Just now, Sirius094 said:

Really? But I didn't see any other government threatening with bombs or missiles :laughga: only Trump.

England

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43719284

France

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/apr/10/theresa-may-to-chair-security-meeting-over-syrian-gas-attack-uk-response-chemical-weapons

 

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Melech
Just now, Sirius094 said:

Yes. Because USA intervened only for its interests. USA gained a lot with the WW2, now Europe is basically at their orders and it's plenty of american bases on its soil. Let's not act like USA is a savior or something else, they were exclusively thinking to their interests :air:

Okay, so let's think about if USA didn't intervene. Nazi Germany would have full control over Europe and the Holocaust would have continued and probably would have extended to other ethnical minorities. Countries like France, UK, Sweden, Poland etc. wouldn't exist anymore. 

So are you really fine with the Holocaust being continued and millions of people being murdered just for the sake of not wanting USA for acting out of "self-interest"? 

 I don't know about you, but I would rather live in an American controlled Europe than in a Nazi controlled Europe. (And the myth that America is controlling Europe is wrong either :rip: Europe and USA are allies and depend on each other) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...