Jump to content
politics

Trump threatens Russia/Syria


FATCAT

Featured Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
sarahb
8 minutes ago, StarryNight said:

threatening canceled 

 

No way he wrote that first one, way too coherent. :laughga: 

He so wants to fire Mueller though. 

Do you feel him sir?
Link to post
Share on other sites

VOLANTIS

Goodbye LG6. :koons: I guess the good sis will have to fight a war first. 

lady-gaga-in-camouflage-jacket-out-in-ne

I'll lift you 3 inches off the ground and drag you to a meter and a half
Link to post
Share on other sites

Eighteen

if we go to war over syria that's going to be the dumbest thing ever. i know assad used chemical weapons and that is in total violation of international law but how about a joint coalition with NATO or some sh*t? not this US goes it alone thing. SOLIDARITY world!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

StarryNight
9 minutes ago, Eighteen said:

 SOLIDARITY world!!!

...speaking of dumbest thing ever :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eighteen
27 minutes ago, StarryNight said:

...speaking of dumbest thing ever :rip:

i mean what is NATO there for? decoration? :saladga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
44 minutes ago, Eighteen said:

if we go to war over syria that's going to be the dumbest thing ever.

Assad is a war criminal. I agree we should have a multi-country retaliation, but if we have to go it alone to stand against war crimes, then it's worth it.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Eighteen
Just now, FATCAT said:

Assad is a war criminal. I agree we should have a multi-country retaliation, but if we have to go it alone to stand against war crimes, then it's worth it.

i disagree. i think it should be a joint international effort (maybe through the UN or NATO) or nothing. i know it's important to stand against war crimes bc assad is setting a dangerous precedent for war but i think the world needs to come together and enforce their international laws. and more importantly when the US gets involved in something like this, chances are they get stuck there like iraq and afghanistan. and then people at home get upset, the troops end up leaving, and then things like ISIS happen :/

Link to post
Share on other sites

monster4life231

Using nuclear weapons or being in possession of them in my opinion should also be a war crime. If you look at the history of America and the U.K. there’s plenty of war crimes they’ve committed. Napalm bombs on school children for instance....

spread peace - #MJInnocent
Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
1 minute ago, Eighteen said:

 joint international effort  or nothing

Doing nothing allows the precedent to be set. We can't let that happen. France has already stated their willingness to strike/retaliate, so hopefully we won't be going at it alone. I think what you're talking about is a good point to bring up, we should be careful about how we leave a situation just like we're careful to enter it, and we definitely could have done better in the past. That shouldn't bar us from acting, however.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

littlepotter
2 hours ago, FATCAT said:

They definitely won't be if we pull out completely. You can't just give up when you're tired of defending the world. Besides, pulling out and becoming isolationists won't prolong American interests throughout the world. The reason we have such an extensive foreign outreach and military bases all over the world is because we want our interests to be continued. 

you're disgusting. **** you and your interests :heart: haven't had a wp in a while so it's nice to spend some on americans encouraging their continued ****ing of the middle east

chaeri pls
Link to post
Share on other sites

monster4life231
4 minutes ago, hunty said:

you're disgusting. **** you and your interests :heart: haven't had a wp in a while so it's nice to spend some on americans encouraging their continued ****ing of the middle east

Can we just have a civil discussion without the swearing. Me and @FATCAT don’t agree with each other yet we stayed mature. There’s no need for insulting one another - everybody has different opinions.

spread peace - #MJInnocent
Link to post
Share on other sites

Eighteen
3 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Doing nothing allows the precedent to be set. We can't let that happen. France has already stated their willingness to strike/retaliate, so hopefully we won't be going at it alone. I think what you're talking about is a good point to bring up, we should be careful about how we leave a situation just like we're careful to enter it, and we definitely could have done better in the past. That shouldn't bar us from acting, however.

the most i would be comfortable with is like what happened last time. a controlled and limited strike against the facilities where these gasses are launched from or housed. no boots on the ground, no drone strikes, no more intervention than that 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...