Jump to content
question

What happened to Fernando Garibay?


candiedroses

Featured Posts

ARTPOP2
46 minutes ago, Eddie said:

No gurl no!!! Not that one :cryga:

I need the electronic one, the ARTRAVE version with the sick drop and the siren and the ability it has to make me jump even if I am sad and the turururu tu tu tu, tututu tu tu :firega:

But thanks anyway :kara:

I think you're talking about this one I have :

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LiNvL_TkLVguUxmXqqv9mZH_fSNk8qls/view?usp=drivesdk

If it's not the artRAVE version, it's very very similar

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Y'all messies are quick to run :emma: What he is saying is that he gets royalties for other's use of BTW, clearly the MDNA tour thing happened because Madonna had the bank to do it and not exactly word and permission from Gaga and Co., most likely it had to do with her reaching the record label and paying the fee to play the song, anyone can pretty much cover anyone as long as they give proper credit and pay due fees for it, in case there is a revenue coming from said cover.

What was he supposed to answer? He obviously wasn't gonna shade madonna and he wasn't gonna give into the fan mess. I swear y'all sometimes :saladga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Creyk said:

We have such clear versions of Partynauseous already. why are you still craving for it

No gurl no!!! You have to listen closely to the one in the ARTRAVE and those fake remakes and you will notice the huuuuuge difference and even the Sia one is different...look do you wanna learn about partynauseous because gurl since that song came out I've studied its sound to find a fake one that is close to the one in the artrave but I haven't succeed :cryga:

What if tomorrow I see you again? Should I say that I used to love you?
Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ARTPOP2 said:

I think you're talking about this one I have :

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LiNvL_TkLVguUxmXqqv9mZH_fSNk8qls/view?usp=drivesdk

If it's not the artRAVE version, it's very very similar

 

Ok I'll give it a listen :queenga:

Edit: Oh my God yaaaassss...this one sounds like the one I want. Maybe I'm crazy for this song, I don't know, but the ones I heard so far are different and this gets close to the partynauseoujfsjkd I want...

Maybe my crave will stop once Gaga release the version then I can shut up and enjoy it :duck:

What if tomorrow I see you again? Should I say that I used to love you?
Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Mustang07 said:

If it helps, Sia’s Hologram uses the instrumental for the PARTYNAUSEOUS artRAVE version :poot:

  Hide contents

 

 

Yeah gurl I know...but I want Gaga's version it has this dark vibe and it's Gaga so :cryga:

What if tomorrow I see you again? Should I say that I used to love you?
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Eddie said:

Yeah gurl I know...but I want Gaga's version it has this dark vibe and it's Gaga so :cryga:

Me too :cryga: Hopefully by 2024 we’ll have it :laughga:

What’s in a reverse-warholian expedition?
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, derpmonster said:

Still insensitive considering he was the main producer of BTW. He valued money over his own work's integrity.

It still had t go through Gaga and her management team, as well though :oprah:

Religion is a product to sell.
Link to post
Share on other sites

PopThatArt

He's working with Asian artists and focusing on K-Pop and giving lectures about music. 

Go see A Star is Born
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think there’s necessarily any bad blood between him and Gaga. They probably had a good, working, professional relationship, compared to Gaga and DJWS, who ended up becoming close friends over the years.

Now, if there’s bad blood between DJWS and Fernando? Hmmm

3 points in and ready for more
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mister Gaga
3 hours ago, Venusfly said:

Idk what’s with the shade in this thread but the dude has been asking to collaborate with her for a long time; he’s said on at least 3 different occasions since 2015 that he’s reached out to Gaga for a collaboration and she hasn’t responded back yet.

She should, since BTW is her best album

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sam Winchester said:

There's nothing going on between them. It's just LM trying to stir up drama. It's not like he fully owns BTW and only his permission counts for madge to play it in her tour. All he said was that he gets paid every time its played. 

And as other users said, he worked on PARTYNAUSEOUS so there you go. 

He’s one of the people that “betrayed” Gaga.

And Partnauseous was recorded early 2012 before the MDNA tour. Two versions were recorded, and Kendrick’s label didn’t like the techno production and Gaga was difficult so nothing ever came of it. She later just included it on her tour.

BYE
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Phlop said:

He’s one of the people that “betrayed” Gaga.

And Partnauseous was recorded early 2012 before the MDNA tour. Two versions were recorded, and Kendrick’s label didn’t like the techno production and Gaga was difficult so nothing ever came of it. She later just included it on her tour.

He didn’t betray Gaga, I have no idea where y’all are getting this from :air:

Also, just to make it clear.  The recording sessions with Kendrick were for his album. PARTYNAUSEOUS was supposed to be Kendrick’s song, Garibay was not involved in the song until it was scrapped from Kendrick’s album and Gaga reused her parts to make a tour interlude.

Gaga was dropped from Kendrick’s album due to an image clash, not sound. Gaga is far from a stereotypical poster girl for a rap album.  This decision was most likely out of Kendrick’s hands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ANYTHING shady you believe Garibay has done or said to Gaga is you projecting.  Garibay was extremely close to Gaga, hence why he was around for three eras.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Benji said:

He didn’t betray Gaga, I have no idea where y’all are getting this from :air:

Also, just to make it clear.  The recording sessions with Kendrick were for his album. PARTYNAUSEOUS was supposed to be Kendrick’s song, Garibay was not involved in the song until it was scrapped from Kendrick’s album and Gaga reused her parts to make a tour interlude.

Gaga was dropped from Kendrick’s album due to an image clash, not sound. Gaga is far from a stereotypical poster girl for a rap album.  This decision was most likely out of Kendrick’s hands.

She was dropped off BDKMV. And Garribay didn’t record Partynauseous in 2014 when the Artrave came out.

Early reports of Partynauseous were that it was supposedly to sound JPOP meets rap.

BYE
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Phlop said:

She was dropped off BDKMV. And Garribay didn’t record Partynauseous in 2014 when the Artrave came out.

Early reports of Partynauseous were that it was supposedly to sound JPOP meets rap.

PARTYNAUSEOUS (Garibay) is made from a short instrumental Garibay made around 2011/2012.  Sia had first dibs and wrote over it, the song was unused and when Gaga approached Garibay he remixed it for PARTYNAUSEOUS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...