Jump to content
opinion

Quality =/= Views


TeenIdle

Featured Posts

TeenIdle

Will this fanbase ever realize that quality doesn't impact a video's popularity that much? Look at the 1B videos.. half of them are sh!t. Even some lyric videos get 500M. And on the other side there are incredible ones with less than 5M. MR's views are not bad because it sucks.. they are bad because for some reason people prefer buying Gaga's music instead of streaming it (not a bad thing after all).

This was my rant caused by the Gaga's YouTube power thread :gaycat: She doesn't need high budget videos for views.. the sad truth is she needs payola. That's why the industry sucks.

𝖓𝖊𝖜 𝖗𝖊𝖑𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖔𝖓
Link to post
Share on other sites

TeenIdle
1 minute ago, Solitaiire said:

sis we been knew. 

Some hunties are still living in perfect delusion :lolly:

𝖓𝖊𝖜 𝖗𝖊𝖑𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖔𝖓
Link to post
Share on other sites

ArtPLAUSE

Yes, we know that views are a measure of popularity and not of quality. That's why they're important, as the quality of a video is something you can evaluate personally, but its popularity does not depend on you. Besides, you can still have popular AND quality videos *cough* Swift *chough*, which is what happened to gaga during TFM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hades

Well just because Gaga mostly serves quality(except that MR video*cough*) it doesn't mean she can't have the quantity too a.k.a views. It's important for her work to be recognized by as many as possible. :gaycat:

Sadly she doesn't have many views but that only reduces the amount of people who can enjoy her work free not the quality of hes.:tony:

Link to post
Share on other sites

CannaeDrive
47 minutes ago, TeenIdle said:

Will this fanbase ever realize that quality doesn't impact a video's popularity that much? Look at the 1B videos.. half of them are sh!t. Even some lyric videos get 500M. And on the other side there are incredible ones with less than 5M. MR's views are not bad because it sucks.. they are bad because for some reason people prefer buying Gaga's music instead of streaming it (not a bad thing after all).

This was my rant caused by the Gaga's YouTube power thread :gaycat: She doesn't need high budget videos for views.. the sad truth is she needs payola. That's why the industry sucks.

You are too generous there, i'd say more like 90% :trollga:

Anyway, visuals, as flashy and cute looking they can be, don't make a crap song any better.

"Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most people that have been on YouTube enough know that the views a video has is not indicative of the quality of the content.

Even using Gaga as an example, her MV for "John Wayne" was her best in a LONG time, but it didn't exactly light the internet on fire. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona Apple

If MR had a good video,it would have at least 200m views because not even fans spammed this video :rip: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maleficent

It's not necessarily the videos that drive the views. In many South American clubs, the DJ plays songs straight from YouTube, thus driving up the number of views (and also explains why Shakira has 1 billion views). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CautiousLurker
51 minutes ago, TeenIdle said:

Will this fanbase ever realize that quality doesn't impact a video's popularity that much?

No

giphy.gif

It's a joke! When you give me that look, it's a joke!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...