Jump to content
lgbt

Trump advisers want Caitlyn Jenner to dance with him to heal LGBT community


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

RAMROD

Caitlyn was celebrated but not anymore after we see more what the transition meant for her so HAH! Keep trying getting that LGBT crowds, I guess.

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
JusKeepBreathin
1 hour ago, Goosey said:

On national TV, Jenner claimed to be a Republican, and to 'not quite get' gay marriage, although "if that word — ‘marriage’ — is really, really that important to you, I can go with it".

That was the extent of the 'negative comments about the gays'.

 

 

"Oh! How horrible! Literally Hitler! An evil person who wants to end homosexuals!" :reductive:

God, I can't believe I m agreeing with you about something. I saw the show from start to finish. This is about a conservative Republican person who literally was just thrown into a liberal LGBT community. She had no prior ties to this community and was learning about what it means to be a member of this community. BTW I know people who have been members of the LGBT community for decades and are also conservative Republicans. The LGBT community doesn't belong to just one side or the other. 

That being said. I don't think Caitlyn Jenner is a pillar of our community. She needs a decade or two of serving our community before that happens. Her dance with Trump would only be a photo op and nothing more. 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SKANK said:

 

Voting actually is treated as privilege not a right in America, which is why 5.3 million Americans who have been convicted of a felony are unable to vote.

I'm sorry but I don't think because some people arent allowed to vote that it means it becomes a privilege. Voting is a right. The USA found appropriate and justified in a free and democratic society to limit that right to 5.3 mil people because of public policies reasons (a choice that is questionnable, but thats another debate). 

 

People here talking about the law not having A CLUE what they are talking about. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...