Jump to content
society

Man rapes toddler, gets no jail time


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
donutellha

WTF

Walk down the runway but don't puke, it's okay. You just had 10 donuts today. Without frosting.
Link to post
Share on other sites

xoxo cupcakke

Oh, my, this cannot be real. Please tell me this is not real, WTH!!!! :madge:

Link to post
Share on other sites

RadioIsOurs

It's the family of the toddler who suggested this decision, which begs the question 'why?' :oprah:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaga Monster

Judge should immediately be fired and get imprisioned as well as the assaulter 

GGD Presidential Elections
Link to post
Share on other sites

maxresdefault.jpg

It is not our differences that divide us. It is our inability to recognize, accept, and celebrate those differences. - Audre Lorde
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaga Monster

Title is misleading the family didn't want the teen to face harsh consequence

GGD Presidential Elections
Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin

That guy looks super mentally handicapped. Does anyone have the details? Was he set free because of his handicap? If not, the Judge needs to be looked at real closely and removed from his or her position.

This kinda shît infuriates me. How the hell does this happen.

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
1 minute ago, Gaga Monster said:

Title is misleading the family didn't want the teen to face harsh consequence

Title is not misleading though. That is literally what happened. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooolong

If my child was raped and the rapist wasn't charged, I'd take matters into my own hands :madge:.

The Unbannable Chanteuse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Smarticle

Why did the family not want charges pressed????

Justice for Grigio Girls!!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooolong
2 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said:

Title is misleading the family didn't want the teen to face harsh consequence

The title isn't misleading and the teen still should've faced more significant consequences. The family not wanting the teen to face harsh consequences doesn't equate to such a light sentence. 

The Unbannable Chanteuse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...