If Gaga performs at the anti-Trump concert, what should her setlist be?

[VIAGRA 100]

For me it would be entirely disrespectful. And not because it would be disrespectful to Trump, but that it would be disrespectful to the inaugural process. 

Protest is fine. 

Holding an "anti inauguration" will validate any opposition in the future to just try and out-bash each other. That's not the point of the inauguration. It's offensive to the Democratic process. And honestly, the money raised for it will likely 90% go to the rich anyway. 

 

Can the left accept it lost and just pick a better candidate next time? I swear, they should change their name to the Pity Party. 

[Saint Laurent 4,862]

She absolutely shouldn't perform if this is true, respect the democratic will of the people.

[Born To Slay 10,996]

3 minutes ago, VIAGRA said:

For me it would be entirely disrespectful. And not because it would be disrespectful to Trump, but that it would be disrespectful to the inaugural process. 

Protest is fine. 

Holding an "anti inauguration" will validate any opposition in the future to just try and out-bash each other. That's not the point of the inauguration. It's offensive to the Democratic process. And honestly, the money raised for it will likely 90% go to the rich anyway. 

 

Can the left accept it lost and just pick a better candidate next time? I swear, they should change their name to the Pity Party. 

We have accepted we lost. Now we will do what the GOP did under Obama and delegitimize him as much as possible and try our best to ruin his presidency. 

If the republicans are gonna be assholes, then the dems have be assholes, otherwise we will lose.

[VIAGRA 100]

1 hour ago, Born To Slay said:

Discrimination should not legal, what if a bakery was against mixed marriage? Should they be allowed to not serve them? I do believe that should be illegal.

This goes beyond that stuff tho. Landlords, employers and health care providers could use this against LGBT people. 

Churches have different exemptions than businesses. Businesses have to engage with the public, someone's personal religious beliefs don't have to. 

It might be insensitive, but that doesn't mean we have to make laws about it. That would be like telling a vegan restaurant they have to serve meat anyways because someone believes it's wrong they ignore meat eaters. 

Discrimination was when they told black people they couldn't eat at a counter because they're black. Eating food isn't any different for any race, so there was no reason for that law. And black people can't change their skin color.

 

A gay wedding for a Christian business is different because you're asking someone to violate their own beliefs to give you a unique service they disagree with. It would be like asking a Jewish Mosque to perform a baptism, or a Seventh Day Adventist to have a Kwanzaa Party, or a Catholic Wedding Planner to throw a bar mitzvah, or a Wiccan Bead Shop to make Rosary Beads. 

Makes no ****ing sense. 

 

People aren't being turned away because they're gay, they're being turned away because they are choosing to enter a contract and that business does not have to agree or support that. You can be gay and not get married. You aren't born married. It's a choice you make. 

Now if the business says, you're gay, we're not serving you, that's discrimination. But they don't have to support your life choices. And whether you're straight or gay, marriage is a choice. 

 

 

[Born To Slay 10,996]

1 minute ago, VIAGRA said:

Churches have different exemptions than businesses. Businesses have to engage with the public, someone's personal religious beliefs don't have to. 

It might be insensitive, but that doesn't mean we have to make laws about it. That would be like telling a vegan restaurant they have to serve meat anyways because someone believes it's wrong they ignore meat eaters. 

Discrimination was when they told black people they couldn't eat at a counter because they're black. Eating food isn't any different for any race, so there was no reason for that law. And black people can't change their skin color.

 

A wedding for a Christian business is different because you're asking someone to violate their own beliefs to give you a unique service they disagree with. People aren't being turned away because they're gay, they're being turned away because they are choosing to enter a contract and that business does not have to agree or support that. You can be gay and not get married. You aren't born married. It's a choice you make. 

Now if the business says, you're gay, we're not serving you, that's discrimination. But they don't have to support your life choices. And whether you're straight or gay, marriage is a choice. 

Okay, so then the same would be true if a mixed couple decided to get married, correct? 

You're asking the racist owner to violate their deeply held beliefs that the races should be separate and your entering a contract that business doesn't support. Getting married is after all a choice, whether ur marrying the same race or not and they don't have to support thta life choice.

There is no difference between what I said above and what u said other then religion being involved. Why should religious bigotry be protected over other forms of bigotry? 

Also FADA isn't exclusive to cases like this, it would let any business discriminate against gays as long as it's based on religious views.

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

26 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

Not everyone on this site is conservative & thinks Trump is the second coming & walks on water like you do @Gaga Monster!  Everything you accuse Hillary of, Trump is ALL that & more!!!  He ran the most hateful evil campaign in modern history or probably ALL of U.S. History, and I applaud people who just don't role over on their backs and just take it/accept it.

They gave Obama hell & one of those people was Donald Trump with the racist birther nonsense!  So what goes around, comes around.  He gets EVERYTHING that is coming to him and more!!!

HE blew up the system, turned it on his head & walked over EVERYONE to get to where he is now & STILL lost the popular vote by 3 million!!!     So why should EVERYONE else not do the same thing as he did??

He set a terrible precedent & won by doing so!  So don't be surprised if others follow suit.  

As for the OP:  Hell yeah they should have an Anti-Trump rally, and she should perform:

1. Born This Way

2. Angel Down 

3. Million Reasons(because it's the current single)

4. Come to Mama(for the season), or whatever the next single will be...   

 

Was Trump the secretary of state and had thousands of confidential emails on an easily hackable server less secure than Gmail? No! A man took a picture in an army submarine and was put in prison for it. Hillary gets away with what she did because she has money and power. Unfair, lock her up.

Did Trump run a foundation that did pay for play with foreign countries and leaders while running  high government position by accepting millions of dollars from foreign nations for chats, getting criminals visas, and from terrorist based countries? She did this all while being one of the top positsitons in government! No, lock her up.

Spoiler

WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It's an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president. 

- A sports executive who was a major donor to the Clinton Foundation and whose firm paid Bill Clinton millions of dollars in consulting fees wanted help getting a visa for a British soccer player with a criminal past.

- The crown prince of Bahrain, whose government gave more than $50,000 to the Clintons’ charity and who participated in its glitzy annual conference, wanted a last-minute meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Did Trump illegally get questions from the debates? No Hillary did!

Did Trump accept money from special interests where people donate money and tell the candidate what to do (cough cough PUPPET cough cough POLITICAL HACK cough) No Hillary did!

Did Trump give private speeches to Wall Street and not reveal what he said? No Hillary did!

So no, Hillary is more corrupt than Trump will ever be. Hillary isn't some nice, innocent older  women that wanted to help you, she is mean, corrupt, and amazing at covering up her horrible past and dodging questions about it. 

And no, I am not saying Trump is Mr. Perfect, he has some dirt on him, but nothing will ever come close to what Hillary has done. Trump has never once put this country in danger like Hillary has, and I am glad she lost because I see her for what she is, the same corrupt candidate as the others.

[hoeslay 4,182]

Ok so instead of bickering lemme answer the f*cking question.

 

1. Born This Way

2. Americano

3. Come to Mama

4. Swine

[Gagaloo911 12,959]

7 hours ago, Gaga Monster said:

Why not give the money to a charity or to the homeless or to the kids who battle cancer everyday. The Democrat party has showed itself with the leaked emails how corrupt it actually is and how racist it is trying to use Bernie's religion against him and leaking questions to Hillary. The GOP has complete power, no amount of money will change that, there is no reason for this concert

This literally has nothing to do with the Democratic party or Hillary but standing up and saying we won't go down without a fight. Those organizations are liberal organizations advocating and fighting for human rights and which now have to prepare for the upcoming battles that will be fought to defend those rights that will now be threatened under a Trump administration. 

 

How tragic that you think we should just take it and not fight back but allow them to trample all over our rights and policies meant to help the American people 

 

Stay pressed and bothered I guess. 

[E24187 615]

5 hours ago, LG said:

Uhhh Republicans did and still do try and resist anything Obama does. He's really not the best example you could bring up for someone who was treated with respect by his opposition.

I was about to say, republicans were extremely disrespectful and some even made death threats. 

[ProdigyARTPOP 3,909]

How about she doesn't make any type of appearance, because you guys forget she's performing at the Super Bowl and that's a huge American Event. & I don't want something to happen to her 

[ProdigyARTPOP 3,909]

18 minutes ago, Gagaloo92 said:

This literally has nothing to do with the Democratic party or Hillary but standing up and saying we won't go down without a fight. Those organizations are liberal organizations advocating and fighting for human rights and which now have to prepare for the upcoming battles that will be fought to defend those rights that will now be threatened under a Trump administration. 

 

How tragic that you think we should just take it and not fight back but allow them to trample all over our rights and policies meant to help the American people 

 

Stay pressed and bothered I guess. 

Yes , we should fight for our rights, but at the moment , we can't do much, we have to wait and see what his first move is, he hasn't even been president for a 00.01 second yet 

[Born To Slay 10,996]

2 minutes ago, ProdigyARTPOP said:

How about she doesn't make any type of appearance, because you guys forget she's performing at the Super Bowl and that's a huge American Event. & I don't want something to happen to her 

What would happen to her? Beyoncé made a political statement at the super bowl itself last year. You don't need to be politically neutral to be a successful performer.

[warhol killah 8,674]

to the OP:

1. Americano

2. Come To Mama

3. Born This Way

4. Angel Down

[GGDisbetter 2,187]

1. Come To Mama

2. Perfect Illusion

3. Government Hooker

4. Swine

(Encore) 5. Born This Way 

[SKANK 14,288]

An event like this has value. It sends a clear message to the rest of the world, and to the historians who will document this time in American history, that the our President Elect is uniquely unpopular and that the majority of voters rejected his ideology.

At one point in time Gaga would have been the perfect artist for such a polarizing performance. I think that time has passed. She wouldn't want to risk loosing her slot at the Brain Damage Cover Up Convention, brought to you by Pepsi-Cola.

But a thirty minute Swine performance would be appropriate. With gallons of real vomit. In a cat costume covered with tiny doll hands.