Bear 7,515 Posted December 7, 2016 Author Share Posted December 7, 2016 Just now, Economy said: Stuff like reaction videos and whatnot, to me makes nonsense to ban that, its promotion But if with the amount of content put out youtube only paid a billion in royalties thats really low but of course to fix that, either ads will have to increase or youtube would have to stop being free so i dunno 👀 Yea it's difficult. I think YouTube could afford to up the amount they pay in royalties, and I think they should, but the copyright law part of this should be left alone. The second YouTube can be held accountable for everything uploaded to it's site they will just stop allowing uploads like that all together- which will seriously damage artist's platforms. The current system of removing copyrighted material on request is much better IMO, because you can take out the offenders while leaving all the reasonable content (reactions,covers, short snippets etc) alone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LePetitGAGABLover 21,234 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, Florin said: If the labels dont want, they can easily not put their work on YouTube. This^^^^^^^ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 I mean. Seriously. They can promote their music on MTV, if they dont like YouTube. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delusional Aura 5,129 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 52 minutes ago, Economy said: Well $1 Billion for the many songs thousands of artists put out? Shesh that actually is low. Break it down and each artist is getting nothing. Maybe the really viewed like Justin Bieber and Rihanna get half a decent check out of this but everyone else Actually record labels take a huge amount of the money. So artists should be going for record labels throats not YouTube's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sillynate 6,170 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 1 hour ago, The Fame Joanne said: What show or movie is this from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderLevi2 5,849 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 1 hour ago, Florin said: If the labels dont want, they can easily not put their work on YouTube. Nah, don't like this way of thinking. It's like telling a woman/minority to find a different job if they don't like being paid less than a man in the same position. They shouldn't move, they should fight against it. Plus, YouTube needs those artists to survive. If everyone pulled from YouTube, there would be a big decrease in viewership. Currently listening to Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fame Joanne 5,985 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 7 minutes ago, sillynate said: What show or movie is this from? A commercial from New Zealand. It's not as funny as it looks in the gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderLevi2 5,849 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 16 minutes ago, Delusional Aura said: Actually record labels take a huge amount of the money. So artists should be going for record labels throats not YouTube's. Or they should be going at both Currently listening to Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacify Him 9,073 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 1 hour ago, Delusional Aura said: What is gaga doing. That woman don't even get money from any sort of streaming, only physical sales. Not even the sales of the album. They only really get real earnings from touring I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delusional Aura 5,129 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 4 minutes ago, AlexanderLevi2 said: Or they should be going at both But didn't the article say YouTube gave record labels 84% of the money? You Tube gotta make some money too for themselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KleinGa 18,177 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 bling not the music teas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderLevi2 5,849 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 20 minutes ago, Delusional Aura said: But didn't the article say YouTube gave record labels 84% of the money? You Tube gotta make some money too for themselves. Where? Currently listening to Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delusional Aura 5,129 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 17 minutes ago, AlexanderLevi2 said: Where? Okay I Made A Mistake . It's Actually Spotify That Does That. And it is clear that Google is extremely unlikely to emulate Spotify, as the latter paid a massive 84% of its total revenues back to the music industry last year. Such move would make YouTube a completely unsustainable business. https://steemit.com/music/@dasan-oneia/taylor-swift-puts-pressure-on-youtube I Didn't See That Word. . . . Forget My 'Flopness' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderLevi2 5,849 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 3 minutes ago, Delusional Aura said: Okay I Made A Mistake . It's Actually Spotify That Does That. And it is clear that Google is extremely unlikely to emulate Spotify, as the latter paid a massive 84% of its total revenues back to the music industry last year. Such move would make YouTube a completely unsustainable business. https://steemit.com/music/@dasan-oneia/taylor-swift-puts-pressure-on-youtube I Didn't See That Word. . . . Forget My 'Flopness' Currently listening to Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Ryan 1,468 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Music not the bling.... my fans think that means that I want to be broke and back on the pole Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.6191c0e33c2bb95727b6afde0e3a277e.gif)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.