NightmareGa 415 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 At least they need to focus on her music, not her past works and her past images Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boneknuckleskin 776 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 10 minutes ago, SlayGagaloo said: You do realize that albums like Revival / Confident / Glory... All have +70? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlayGagaloo 16,152 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Just now, boneknuckleskin said: Over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingerella 3,170 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 It definitely deserves more than 60. This is definitely her rawest record to date. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarBoy 58 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I think most of the reviewers are bias. You can't expect a huge madonna stan to praise Gaga tbh. So i dont believe them. Rock N Roll B*tches! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMKKARDASHiAN 8,570 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I think 60 is low, but not by much. I'd say between 65-70. It's a decent album, with a couple high points but mainly middle of the road with only a few lows. I do think the critics should review the album and not the artist, and most of the fluff of the actual articles are irrelevant to what they need to be doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monsterish 5,520 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 It deserves at least 75-80 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpthecat 928 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 No, it doesn't. Especially not in the sea of mediocre records and boring artists. And I couldn't tell the same with ARTPOP, though I appreciated it, I couldn't connect with it the way I does with Joanne. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 93,592 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 No matter what she will do the critics will eat her alive.. She's Gaga after all.. When lyrics like "I slay yes I slay" are praised by critics, I don't take them seriously.. I'm working late, cause I'm a puta Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikaisamonster 225 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I'm not surprised that the reviews are mixed - but the NYT article was extremely offensive. He kept saying how there were strong moments yet didn't seem to mention what those were. He just continued bashing her I was hoping to see solid 70/80's across the board. Hopefully as more reviews roll out the reviews will be better I think it's different because we all follow Gaga so closely and know her background and story - these dumb critics just don't get it xxx Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TropicOfCANCER 6,292 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 33 minutes ago, Leaf said: Would have been interesting to have seen her release it under a pseudonym. no offense, but what would that have done? It's not like critics wouldn't be able to tell its Gaga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manul 7,377 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 It deserves at least 80+ to be fair and I don't even like (much) half of the tracks in there. But they are probably doing this because they just can't see the authenticity of it all and I can't blame them much tbh, I've been struggling to find anything authentic about this era since P.I. release and kind of failing. it wasn't laaaahv Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
orb1tx 128 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 there are at least 5 good songs songs, out of 13, and PI is awesome, . that makes it a 75, not her best work , but a very good effort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanWinchester 41,390 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I mean why would they call her inauthentic/untrue when this is her most personal and stripped-down album/era yet?? It makes their hate so transparent. Flyin' like a 1000 Doves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toewsy 1,842 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Obviously we're all biased af but I really think Joanne's being done so wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.