Trump will win, says Prof who predicted every election since 1984

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

33 minutes ago, shane_c said:

Right, thats criticizing him from the left to try to appeal to his supporters. There's  all kinds of issues (spending, raising taxes, socialism, honeymooning in communist Russia, praising Castro and Cuba, etc etc...) he can be attacked from the center and the right from which Hillary avoided doing but Republicans definitely wouldn't.

And Republicans basically ignored him during the primaries while they attacked Hillary constantly. They'd love to run against him. I can link you to ads run by Republicans that are fake pro Bernie and negative against Hillary. Republicans literally tried to help him win.

If you think the little he got in the liberal Dem primaries is anything you have no idea how different that is compared to the GE. Like I said he'd be scrutinized in detail by the media, attacked viciously by the Republican party, and have millions and millions of dollars negative ads dumped on him. What do you think his popularity numbers would be then?

...And don't forget about that extremely offensive & cringeworthy(to say the least) RAPE fantasy letter he did while in college & never sufficiently explained it off!?  

 

[Whispering 18,865]

1 hour ago, SKANK said:

 

Where have you been the past year? The RNC demonized him as a liberal loon and evil socialist, while the DNC plotted to use his faith against him, and Hillary stooped so low as to suggest he was responsible for the Sandy Hook massacre. He has been put through the ringer by both political parties, and has certainly faced criticism by the media, and in spite of that is still incredibly popular.

Where have you been? In some BernieBro bubble? The RNC had laser focus on demonizing Hillary and hardly ever even mentioned Bernie. The DNC never mentioned his faith to anyone in the press or to the public. One guy mentioned that Bernie's lack of any religious affiliation could be floated out there...which was passed up as a viable option. Hillary did not suggest Bernie was responsible for Sandy Hook, that's ridiculous. 

Bernie was not vetted at even a minimal level, by either party of by the media. Other than the interview he gave to the NYT, where he had no clue what his policy was on his main subject matter in every stump speech, there was very little criticism. Put through the ringer? That's a joke! I wish Hillary was "put through the ringer" in the same way Bernie was! 

[Whispering 18,865]

51 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

...And don't forget about that extremely offensive & cringeworthy(to say the least) RAPE fantasy letter he did while in college & never sufficiently explained it off!?  

 

Or the whole living in a shack with no steady occupation until he was forty thing...or leaving his kid and wife to go "find himself". That wouldn't have gone over well with the female vote. The RNC would have made him out to be some lazy, half-assed hippie and dead beat dad. 

I'm sure the Russians would have found some interesting information, especially in his taxes. They would have leaked those, along with Jane's loan fraud mess at the college she worked at and his divorce details, etc. Bernie has emails, too..and so does his staff. Who knows what they would have found there? 

[Whispering 18,865]

15 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

Oh god the Bernie NUTS are out in full force again, because of what some professor said!  Smh  

Well now you all know(Ironically) how Hillary Clinton's supporters felt back in 2008!  

 

For most of them, it was their first political crush. They really believed a politician was going to change the world. They will learn as they get older! 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

1 minute ago, Whispering said:

For most of them, it was their first political crush. They really believed a politician was going to change the world. They will learn as they get older! 

Like all of us who ARE older had too!  

 

[SKANK 14,288]

57 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Where have you been? In some BernieBro bubble? The RNC had laser focus on demonizing Hillary and hardly ever even mentioned Bernie. The DNC never mentioned his faith to anyone in the press or to the public. One guy mentioned that Bernie's lack of any religious affiliation could be floated out there...which was passed up as a viable option. Hillary did not suggest Bernie was responsible for Sandy Hook, that's ridiculous. 

Bernie was not vetted at even a minimal level, by either party of by the media. Other than the interview he gave to the NYT, where he had no clue what his policy was on his main subject matter in every stump speech, there was very little criticism. Put through the ringer? That's a joke! I wish Hillary was "put through the ringer" in the same way Bernie was! 

 

Her statements/tweets regarding Sanders and Sandy Hook are available online for you to peruse at your own discretion (have a sick bag at the ready), and I certainly never suggested him being put through the ringer was comparable to her crucifixion, but since I have a personal standard of not exchanging ideas with people who use churlish childish political pejoratives like "Bernie Bros" as a means of dismissing an individual's opinion this will conclude our interaction.

 

 

 

[Morphine Prince 109,683]

This thread is taking me back to the primaries  

Come on, guys. We are one month away from this thing being over. 

The truth is if you don't vote for Clinton, you will be responsible for Trump winning. It's that simple. 

She can win this and we all know it. Do you think minorities are going to vote for Trump? Nope! Hispanics especially will come out in full force to vote against him. 

[Whispering 18,865]

4 minutes ago, SKANK said:

 

Her statements/tweets regarding Sanders and Sandy Hook are available online for you to peruse at your own discretion (have a sick bag at the ready), and I certainly never suggested him being put through the ringer was comparable to her crucifixion, but since I have a personal standard of not exchanging ideas with people who use churlish childish political pejoratives like "Bernie Bros" as a means of dismissing an individual's opinion this will conclude our interaction.

 

 

 

I find it comical that you quote and reply, but then try to pass off that you are too good to be discussing a subject with someone. Give me a break. 

[ReidOne 12,427]

Don't take any of this too seriously, lol... 

.

.

.

.

.

.

[SKANK 14,288]

3 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

This thread is taking me back to the primaries  

Come on, guys. We are one month away from this thing being over. 

The truth is if you don't vote for Clinton, you will be responsible for Trump winning. It's that simple. 

She can win this and we all know it. Do you think minorities are going to vote for Trump? Nope! Hispanics especially will come out in full force to vote against him. 

 

That is only true in swing states. I live in a state which Clinton will inevitably win. If you live in a decidedly, definitively, definitely, no-doubt-about-it, Blue state there is no harm in voting for a third party candidate.

 

Just now, Whispering said:

I find it comical that you quote and reply, but then try to pass off that you are too good to be discussing a subject with someone. Give me a break. 

 

 

 

 

[Whispering 18,865]

11 minutes ago, SKANK said:

 

 

 

 

 

This is a picture of a b-r-a-k-e. 

[SKANK 14,288]

7 minutes ago, Whispering said:

This is a picture of a b-r-a-k-e. 

 

 

[Redstreak 6,653]

This thread is like the most stereotypical stan war, except this time the delulu's who can't admit that their fave has some tendencies that need to be criticized and addressed can affect the entire direction of our country/planet

[SKANK 14,288]

5 minutes ago, Redstreak said:

This thread is like the most stereotypical stan war, except this time the delulu's who can't admit that their fave has some tendencies that need to be criticized and addressed can affect the entire direction of our country/planet

That is exactly the reason why I don't have political conversations with people who use expressions like Bernie Bros to discredit a person, it's pure political stan wars.

 

[Whispering 18,865]

27 minutes ago, Redstreak said:

This thread is like the most stereotypical stan war, except this time the delulu's who can't admit that their fave has some tendencies that need to be criticized and addressed can affect the entire direction of our country/planet

The delulu Bernie Bros (just corrected for Skank)  who can't admit he lost because he didn't get the most votes and failed to engage the minority community, who can't admit Bernie couldn't sell his policies due to lack of specifics and the fact that people simply didn't want their taxes to increase, their 401Ks to be affected, or their standard of living to change. 

Yes, Trump would greatly affect the entire direction of the country for the next several decades...in a negative way for anyone who isn't a white, straight, religious, conservative male. And yes, his deciscions would also greatly affect the planet, just like Bush's did. Let the Alt Right and Tea Party nuts win and see what you get.