ChasingTheGhost 2 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I ran the spectogram scan, it's re-encoded. I guess we'll just have to wait for a legit one to surface. thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Degenerate Beauty 0 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I ran the spectogram scan, it's re-encoded. I guess we'll just have to wait for a legit one to surface. So its not real ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alvaro 5 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 So its not real ? Nope. It's basically a re-encoded 128. I'm so pressed right now. :omg: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam 8 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I think a 256 mp3 file is different then a 256 m4a (iTunes file) file. They're the same quality, just different formats. :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChasingTheGhost 2 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Nope. It's basically a re-encoded 128. I'm so pressed right now. Well.. is it friday in Ireland yet. :( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LipglossLuxury 5 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 *:sad: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat 0 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 They're the same quality, just different formats. :) Oh, I read somewhere that a 320kbps MP3 sounds the same as a 256kbps M4A. So that must be bullocks. :sweat: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alvaro 5 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Oh, I read somewhere that a 320kbps MP3 sounds the same as a 256kbps M4A. So that must be bullocks. In some occasions, the 256kbps M4A sounds a lot better. That's why I always go for iTunes rips when it comes to music. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OfficialRomanStone 37 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 WOW, loving this album so far! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam 8 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 In some occasions, the 256kbps M4A sounds a lot better. That's why I always go for iTunes rips when it comes to music. It usually sounds better because it's official, and other downloads from other sources can often be lower quality rips upscaled, etc. But iTunes Plus sounds the same as ripping an album from CD in 256kbps! :) By the way - your set, it's amazing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VisKip 0 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) Legit v0 (higher quality than we had) mp3 got posted on What.CD. Someone grab it for us. http://what.cd/torre...php?id=72126002 Edited January 25, 2012 by VisKip Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChasingTheGhost 2 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 pics dont work. :crossed: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam 8 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Not many people have logins for What.CD, so we could be waiting a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VisKip 0 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 :crossed: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alvaro 5 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 It usually sounds better because it's official, and other downloads from other sources can often be lower quality rips upscaled, etc. But iTunes Plus sounds the same as ripping an album from CD in 256kbps! :) By the way - your set, it's amazing. But there's always a way to know if they're upscaled or not. What I mean to say is that sometimes iTunes rips sound better than actual CD rips. And thank you! :heart: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts