RadioIsOurs 13,876 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, BurqaSwg said: is that sarcasm? Do you think I would really say that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurqaSwg 4,681 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, RainbowBlonde said: Do you think I would really say that? idk maybe, everything is possible Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix 17,395 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 37 minutes ago, Torturo said: yes it did, only "negative" review is one written by britney stan for guardian, everyone else praised it drag the one that haters cling onto lmao 💎 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas P 18,479 Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 K so wiki updated to polarized reviews. I’m a simple guy to please, if you like Melodrama, we chill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lona Delery 7,214 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 28 minutes ago, TylerBR97 said: Wikipedia is 95% accurate and that's a fact. I hate when professors say it's not reliable It is. Don't believe what those other pieces of **** say. Every single thing added to Wikipedia needs to be backed up by sources. So it's pretty accurate. Not really, I read so much crap on Wiki already that didnt have a source. The English version is quite unreliable Sometimes it feels like I've got a war in my mind, I wanna get off but I keep riding the ride Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextyr97 19,903 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, Lona Delery said: Not really, I read so much crap on Wiki already that didnt have a source. The English version is quite unreliable Idk it's my go to for essays and I have yet to be faulted for it lmfao. I just put that I got it from somewhere else Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Togekiss 2,522 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 49 minutes ago, Torturo said: yes it did, only "negative" review is one written by britney stan for guardian, everyone else praised it I unfortunately read the pitchfork "review" in the form of a 'convo' as the author put it. It was so full of pretentious garbage like: "the key change was unearned" My eyes almost rolled out of my head. building a daydream Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorcerer 12,487 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 8 minutes ago, Thomas P said: K so wiki updated to polarized reviews. Why did PI receive "polarized" reviews? In wiki, there are only three negative reviews. OMG. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sipthistea 21,099 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 The positive reviews have been more serious than the negative ones. So.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
venusfly 17,885 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, Camore said: Why did PI receive "polarized" reviews? In wiki, there are only three negative reviews. OMG. The article is still being edited and things will change about until editors can come to a concensus and more reviews come in, its usualy unstable in the beginning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azor Ahai 18,861 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Wikpedia article at this moment: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miel 15,009 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 54 minutes ago, Supersonic said: The only outlets that criticized it were Pitchfork & The Guardian (The review from the Guardian was a mess though because the journalist is an obvious Britney Spears stan, criticized Gaga's vocal performance and lauded Britney's on Glory) Outlets that have reviewed positively were: New York Post NME LA Times Digital Spy All of those previously dragged Gaga. Other positives were from: The Daily Telegraph Billboard Idolator The Independant The Needle Drop Nice! Waiting for the retroactive acclaim. NME... sistren... 3 points in and ready for more Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sipthistea 21,099 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, Miel said: Nice! Waiting for the retroactive acclaim. NME... sistren... Right? I thought NME was going to be like " This is Gaga's most pretentious first single" Like they did with BTW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioIsOurs 13,876 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 16 minutes ago, Thomas P said: K so wiki updated to polarized reviews. Watch as he who shall not be named changes his mind about Wiki being 95% accurate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorcerer 12,487 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 8 minutes ago, Azor Ahai said: Wikpedia article at this moment: OMG! GENERALLY POSITIVE REVIEWS. Thank you for the person who raised the "polarized review" issue in Wikipedia Talk page. There are some positive reviews still not recognized in Wikipedia, tho. WAITING FOR THAT CRITICAL ACCLAIM. EDIT: They changed it to mixed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.