Yes! Some monsters are waiting for Cheek To Cheek's sequel as well.

[DiscoStyx 3,355]

6 hours ago, Dawson said:

I've yet to listen to cheek to cheek fully  

[RAMROD 109,437]

Same.

I alwaya look forward any Gaga projects.

 

She's an artist, and I am fully supporting all things she does about it.

[Paper Gangsta 6,693]

9 hours ago, Himeros26 said:

And that gives people like you an excuse to be rude and complain and whine like a spoiled child? 

only spoiled child here is you with whining about people who aren't anticipating it  if you enjoy it then do it but then also let the people who don't express their opinion aswell, or we should all be zombies who say "yas gaga yas gaga" even tho we don't like something? this is forum and forums are here for discussion, and you can't expect everyone to like something. But keep thinking you're superior if that makes you feel better cause you listen her "for the voiceee" and not the mean  bye

[Swan Heart 7,382]

Excited.

[ViviLittleM 3]

Wow this thread is such a mess

[Guest]

I'd love a jazz album around Christmas time. You can't deny C2C was really a healing after ARTPOP(which I enjoyed too but it was a hot mess). Everything was so polite, well organized and promoted(thx Poppy Campbell pls do dat fo LG5), Gaga was radiating etc

 

BRING IT ON

[Creyk 17,805]

10 hours ago, Himeros26 said:

And that gives people like you an excuse to be rude and complain and whine like a spoiled child? 

Yes

 Jazz is irrelevant and doesn't give Gaga hits.

Deal with it

[Swan Heart 7,382]

3 minutes ago, Creyk said:

Jazz is irrelevant and doesn't give Gaga hits.

No one gives a **** about that tho

It's jazz and Gaga is doing it because she loves it. People sometimes do things because they like doing it, ya know. Not everything is for money.

[Creyk 17,805]

Just now, Swan Heart said:

No one gives a **** about that tho

It's jazz and Gaga is doing it because she loves it. People sometimes do things because they like doing it, ya know.

She did enough things that she loves to do already. For years now.

And charts are important, only delusional people don't acknowledge that.

[Swan Heart 7,382]

[Creyk 17,805]

Just now, Swan Heart said:

Is that all you got?

Weak.

[Swan Heart 7,382]

6 minutes ago, Creyk said:

Is that all you got?

Weak.

I'm sorry but I'm not going to waste anymore of my time arguing with you, nothing will come out of it.

[Ronk 14,762]

11 hours ago, alaska5000 said:

Because music, like all art, is up for criticism.

The tone matters.  No music, art, or artist is good or bad.  Because any particular music, art, or artist is loved by some and not liked by others.  People who don't like jazz telling Gaga she shouldn't do jazz is like people who don't like cubism and surrealism telling Picasso he shouldn't paint in those styles.  People can say they dislike jazz and will not purchase it, but to drag Gaga for doing jazz is rude.  It fails to take into account that people's tastes vary, and that jazz makes Gaga happy.

[Ronk 14,762]

6 hours ago, Creyk said:

She did enough things that she loves to do already. For years now.

And charts are important, only delusional people don't acknowledge that.

Wut?  Putting limits on the happiness of others?

[alaska5000 752]

3 minutes ago, Ronk said:

The tone matters.  No music, art, or artist is good or bad.  Because any particular music, art, or artist is loved by some and not liked by others.  People who don't like jazz telling Gaga she shouldn't do jazz is like people who don't like cubism and surrealism telling Picasso he shouldn't paint in those styles.  People can say they dislike jazz and will not purchase it, but to drag Gaga for doing jazz is rude.  It fails to take into account that people's tastes vary, and that jazz makes Gaga happy.

People are taking shots at Gaga because they would rather her not solely focus on jazz AGAIN, not because they don't like jazz. And if she does do it again we're all gonna live for it regardless, we're just poking fun. Not that serious tbh.