brendablethyn 536 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 A double-digit majority of Americans disapproves of the FBI's decision last week to not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton in the investigation into her private email server, according to the results of the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll out Monday. More than half—56 percent—said they disagreed with FBI Director James Comey's recommendation to the Justice Department to not charge Clinton with any crime, even as he remarked that she and her colleagues were "extremely careless" while slightly more than one-third, or 35 percent, said they approved. Asked whether Clinton's conduct made them worried about what the former secretary of state would do as president, 57 percent responded that it did, while 39 percent said the issue is not related to how she would perform as commander in chief. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/poll-majority-disapproves-of-fbis-clinton-decision-225352 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uo111 5,285 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Color me skeptical of phone polls and their findings. The average age of people with a landline has to be in the 40's by now. The average age of people who respond to "do you have time to take a political survey," with "well I sure do," has to be in the 60's by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaperIz 7,354 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Not surprising all my friends are furious lol but im friends with lots of Republicans so Human generated art Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 174,651 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 21 minutes ago, uo111 said: Color me skeptical of phone polls and their findings. The average age of people with a landline has to be in the 40's by now. The average age of people who respond to "do you have time to take a political survey," with "well I sure do," has to be in the 60's by now. No lies detected though. Like so many people have said before, if she gets charged then you also need to charge Bush and the RNC 'cause they do/did the exact same thing but on a much larger scale. Whimsical bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsTommyBitch 12,640 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 The methodology aside, right wing media is deliberately trying to lead people to draw conclusions that the FBI's decision was somehow irrational and unprecedented to try to show that she got some "special treatment" which isn't true, so a lot of people hear "She was reckless; no charges at all!" and miss everything in the middle. The poll doesn't bother me. And the numbers themselves are questionable 私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,776 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 This issue is blown out of proportion so damn much as if it relates to her vision on economics, education, foreign policy or the like in any way! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Himeros26 1,688 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 I mean it makes sense considering the FBI basically stated if it were anyone else, they would be serving time. but they didn't because it's Clinton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 1 hour ago, uo111 said: Color me skeptical of phone polls and their findings. The average age of people with a landline has to be in the 40's by now. The average age of people who respond to "do you have time to take a political survey," with "well I sure do," has to be in the 60's by now. Politico has a great polling team, and phone polls are some of the more accurate ones actually. I know from experience, almost every internal poll coming from the RNC or DNC are done by phone. If the database is good, you yield a pretty accurate number. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 41 minutes ago, Luc said: This issue is blown out of proportion so damn much as if it relates to her vision on economics, education, foreign policy or the like in any way! Yeah because someone who is "extremely careless" with classified information should be given the highest security clearance in the executive branch. Smart. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 4,414 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Buncha morons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 4,414 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 10 minutes ago, MJHolland said: Yeah because someone who is "extremely careless" with classified information should be given the highest security clearance in the executive branch. Smart. Well, "extremely careless" was just his meaningless, personal opinion (and note that he's a Republican). His professional opinion was that he had no legal case against her. And yeah, he should've left his personal opinion out of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 49 minutes ago, Himeros26 said: I mean it makes sense considering the FBI basically stated if it were anyone else, they would be serving time. but they didn't because it's Clinton. Source? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 4,414 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 49 minutes ago, Himeros26 said: I mean it makes sense considering the FBI basically stated if it were anyone else, they would be serving time. but they didn't because it's Clinton. They absolutely did not say that. In fact, they said the exact opposite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brendablethyn 536 Posted July 11, 2016 Author Share Posted July 11, 2016 The majority of Americans believe Hillary is a criminal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Nemo said: Well, "extremely careless" was just his meaningless, personal opinion (and note that he's a Republican). His professional opinion was that he had no legal case against her. And yeah, he should've left his personal opinion out of it. It wasn't a personal opinion? It was the finding of an FBI investigation?? they didn't find that she was careful buddy. He told the public what they found because that's called transparency into a high profile figure running for the highest American office. The public has the right (and legal right) to know what the investigation found. It's pathetic that one would think that the findings of the investigation should have been closed to the public, isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.