20 killed in terror attack in Bangladesh

[Whispering 18,865]

9 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

There is no theological sense to it. What was being referred to is what ISIS leaders said. THEY called for attacks during Ramadan and made it sound as if it's a time where more attacks should be conducted. 

Never did I see anyone saying Ramadan is a time to kill people in Islam. What was said was that these groups specifically have called for attacks during Ramadan. 

Of course, once again showing how they grab a religious practice and twist it to fit their agendas.  

And wait, Whispering is a she?  

Exactly, and I really don't know how to make it any more clear. 

That's me in my avi.  jk 

[lego 44,165]

1 hour ago, Whispering said:

Same for you.

 

I'm not the one who said don't quote me, while keep on replying, you did. 

So stop replying, if you don't want to continue.

 

1 hour ago, Whispering said:

Nothing was wrong with my wording. You simply wanted it put your way.

 

Yes there was. You simply expressed yourself the wrong way.

 

 

1 hour ago, Whispering said:

Oh, you are an authority? Is there a president of official terrorist terminology? Thousands of respected news sources around the world disagree with you and don't buy into your personal "correct" terminology. 

 

You're the one who puts words to other people's mouth. I said I know what I'm talking about when it comes to theological part of your comment, it's just wrong the way you put it.

What is now issue with terrorist terminology? What exactly you don't buy? lol 

And what are these "respected news sources" anyway, none of the mainstrean media is completely without bias. "Respected news sources" don't have any authority on definitions of the words either. So I have no idea what are you trying to prove here. 

 

 

[avalon x 4,200]

^ Don't waste your breath, tbh. You can't even say bye when you want to leave or use emojis.  Some people. 

[Whispering 18,865]

10 hours ago, YourSweet666 said:

 

I'm not the one who said don't quote me, while keep on replying, you did. 

So stop replying, if you don't want to continue.

 

 

Yes there was. You simply expressed yourself the wrong way.

 

 

 

You're the one who puts words to other people's mouth. I said I know what I'm talking about when it comes to theological part of your comment, it's just wrong the way you put it.

What is now issue with terrorist terminology? What exactly you don't buy? lol 

And what are these "respected news sources" anyway, none of the mainstrean media is completely without bias. "Respected news sources" don't have any authority on definitions of the words either. So I have no idea what are you trying to prove here. 

 

 

"if you can't comprehend what is meant with multiple explanations and clarifications."

 

No, there wasn't. You simply refuse to read what was stated, repeated and clarified multiple times. 

 

Now there are no respected news outlets? Okay, that's good to know, for the next time you post something here from a news source.