JbGaga 2,261 Posted June 12, 2016 Author Share Posted June 12, 2016 Just now, RockySayTalk said: News reports I can find are saying allegedly claimed, do you have anything definitive? It was breaking on my TV. I will get it when i find it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 117,118 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 So sad, fxckkkk! So angry with these guys yet so helpless 😡 (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 Yet again, he refuses to call this radical islamic terrorism even those his security team was saying the man pledged allegiance to Al Bagdadi and shouted Alla U Akbar when we went on his rampage . Our president is truly a shame to the United States of America. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 23 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Because that's the worst case scenario. No need to jump to conclusions. The earliest reports were saying he praised the ISIS leader right before he opened fired, yet our President refused to even mention the words Islam or Muslim or radical islamic terror in his speech. That is shameful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 Just now, MJHolland said: The earliest reports were saying he praised the ISIS leader right before he opened fired, yet our President refused to even mention the words Islam or Muslim or radical islamic terror in his speech. That is shameful. Well the president can't jump to conclusions. The reports could have been inaccurate. When the proof came, it was concluded to be a terrorist attack and the proper response was made. It wasn't about being politically correct. It was about being factually correct. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 3 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Well the president can't jump to conclusions. The reports could have been inaccurate. When the proof came, it was concluded to be a terrorist attack and the proper response was made. It wasn't about being politically correct. It was about being factually correct. How is he calling it a terror attack but not an islamic terror attack? Every report was saying it was both. What information is he getting that said this terror attack was led by anything other than Islam and its homophobic hate it spreads? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 1 minute ago, MJHolland said: How is he calling it a terror attack but not an islamic terror attack? Every report was saying it was both. What information is he getting that said this terror attack was led by anything other than Islam and its homophobic hate it spreads? Oh you mean that bit. I dunno. Probably didn't want to be divisive and play into Trump's hands? It's not like they've called terrorist acts committed by Christians in the name of Christianity as Christian Terrorist attacks either. It's one thing to acknowledge it. It's a whole other thing to name-call it as president. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 8 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Oh you mean that bit. I dunno. Probably didn't want to be divisive and play into Trump's hands? It's not like they've called terrorist acts committed by Christians in the name of Christianity as Christian Terrorist attacks either. It's one thing to acknowledge it. It's a whole other thing to name-call it as president. Like when?!?! It's not name calling. This is the world we live in. Americans have to go out every day into crowds and be afraid of being attacked by a MUSLIM terrorist, not christians ones. We deserve to have a president who calls it like it is and don't play politics when they tell us the FACTS about a situation like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderLevi2 5,849 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 8 minutes ago, MJHolland said: Like when?!?! It's not name calling. This is the world we live in. Americans have to go out every day into crowds and be afraid of being attacked by a MUSLIM terrorist, not christians ones. We deserve to have a president who calls it like it is and don't play politics when they tell us the FACTS about a situation like this. The Oklahoma City Bombing and the KKK are just a few examples of Christian terrorism Currently listening to Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 9 minutes ago, MJHolland said: Like when?!?! It's not name calling. This is the world we live in. Americans have to go out every day into crowds and be afraid of being attacked by a MUSLIM terrorist, not christians ones. We deserve to have a president who calls it like it is and don't play politics when they tell us the FACTS about a situation like this. People know the facts. The President of the USA has to be careful with what he says. If the President of the USA outright calls it an Islamic terrorist attack, ISIS can use it for their own agendas. AlexanderLevi gave you examples of Christian terrorism. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 3 minutes ago, AlexanderLevi2 said: The Oklahoma City Bombing and the KKK are just a few examples of Christian terrorism Not that it matters, but the Oklahoma City Bombing was not done as an act of Christian terror. They expressed anti-government sentiments. Had little to nothing to do about religions, and many would argue that the KKK was not motivated by religion but by racism. The Bible doesn't condone racist and suicide murders. The Quran does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 2 minutes ago, MJHolland said: Not that it matters, but the Oklahoma City Bombing was not done as an act of Christian terror. They expressed anti-government sentiments. Had little to nothing to do about religions, and many would argue that the KKK was not motivated by religion but by racism. The Bible doesn't condone racist and suicide murders. The Quran does. Eh all Abrahamic religions have a penchant for violence. The issue is whether the followers are able to disassociate with that mentality. At present, it seems to be mostly relegated to Islam and some adherent's literal interpretation of its texts that's for sure. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.