LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Via The Hill “It is unfortunate that the media, in a rush to judgement, are ignoring the Democratic National Committee’s clear statement that it is wrong to count the votes of superdelegates before they actually vote at the convention this summer,” spokesman Michael Briggs said Monday night. “Secretary Clinton does not have and will not have the requisite number of pledged delegates to secure the nomination. She will be dependent on superdelegates who do not vote until July 25 and who can change their minds between now and then. They include more than 400 superdelegates who endorsed Secretary Clinton 10 months before the first caucuses and primaries and long before any other candidate was in the race Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 7, 2016 Author Share Posted June 7, 2016 Ah...now I see where some Bernie supporters are getting their claims from. It's from the Sanders campaign itself. Well the statement is already misleading. You can't really count the votes of pledged delegates either til they vote at the convention. That's the point of delegates. They vote for the candidate on the day of the convention. The media has declared her the presumptive nominee, not the official one. How is this not true? The superdelegates can change their opinion that is true, but what makes Sanders think he can change their minds at this point? It also rings of hypocrisy on his part. As Bernie Sanders and his supporters argue that Hillary Clinton can't clinch the Democratic nomination on Tuesday - because superdelegates don't count until the convention - it is worth noting that Sanders endorsed Barack Obama two days after Obama crossed the magic number (pledged + superdelegate), saying he had become Democratic nominee. "And Sanders' endorsement of Obama came before Clinton had officially exited the 2008 presidential race. Furthemore, Clinton will surely have a majority of the pledged delegates. Why is Sanders so keen on overturning the will of the people, given that his message was to give them a voice? So it seems Sanders has flip flopped several times on this particular issue. What a shame Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,997 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Well it's true but it's HIGHLY unlikely they will change their minds. Some changed their minds today AGAINST Sanders so..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion Heart 15,041 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 "..superdelegates ...who can change their minds.." Yes. They sure did! From Sanders to Clinton ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 7, 2016 Author Share Posted June 7, 2016 Just now, Lion Heart said: "..superdelegates ...who can change their minds.." Yes. They sure did! From Sanders to Clinton Apparently Sanders had a different view of superdelegates counting for the presumptive nominee in 2008 Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pierre 10,480 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Someone is pressed. ❝Is not blue, not turquoise, not lapis. It's actually cerulean❞. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teo 609 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Somebody's a sore loser...I'm sorry but if the republican candidates can lose to Trump and do it with dignity he should be able too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.