Failure of Burlington College is a big problem for Bernie and Jane Sanders

[PaperIz 7,354]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

Honey that's from the article  

Either way it's an immediate turn off and incredibly disrespectful. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 minute ago, PaperIz said:

Either way it's an immediate turn off and incredibly disrespectful. 

It's also a very superficial reason to dismiss an entire article, especially one that isn't an opinion piece  

You don't seem to have a problem reading articles calling Hillary a liar and a crook, just saying.  

[Whispering 18,865]

32 minutes ago, Nemo said:

Where?

The Bernie Sanders campaign’s most recent Federal Election Commission filing ran over 85,000 pages. A few weeks earlier, the Sanders campaign had received a 43 page letter from the FEC asking to make sure certain donors have not contributed over the legal limit. In March, they received a 95 page letter with a similar inquiry. Even after that, the Sander's campaign continued to accept donations over the limit and from outside of the US. 

[PaperIz 7,354]

10 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

It's also a very superficial reason to dismiss an entire article, especially one that isn't an opinion piece  

You don't seem to have a problem reading articles calling Hillary a liar and a crook, just saying.  

Well that's because she is those things  but I don't agree with people making fun of her, disagreeing with her sure, but not making fun of her. And I think it's a good reason to not read an article, it immediately shows immaturity and bias.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

3 minutes ago, PaperIz said:

Well that's because she is those things  but I don't agree with people making fun of her

The irony in this statement.

Mocking people is more than using slurs. In fact calling her a crook and a liar is far more insulting because you aren't just attacking her person you're also attacking her character, beliefs, values, among other things.

People here have repeatedly shown you that Hillary is no more a liar than any other politician, including Sanders, both sitting at around 70% truth rating for their contested statements.

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

They've also repeatedly shown you that Hillary is not a crook because not once has she been charged or indicted, having never broken any law as of this writing

Yet you continue to believe that you aren't mocking her.

I'm sorry Paperlz but if you still hold the same viewpoint after all this then any claims of immaturity are bias apply to you, and I'm saying this with all due respect.

[PaperIz 7,354]

20 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

The irony in this statement.

Mocking people is more than using slurs. In fact calling her a crook and a liar is far more insulting because you aren't just attacking her person you're also attacking her character, beliefs, values, among other things.

People here have repeatedly shown you that Hillary is no more a liar than any other politician, including Sanders, both sitting at around 70% truth rating for their contested statements.

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

They've also repeatedly shown you that Hillary is not a crook because not once has she been charged or indicted, having never broken any law as of this writing

Yet you continue to believe that you aren't mocking her.

I'm sorry Paperlz but if you still hold the same viewpoint after all this then any claims of immaturity are bias apply to you, and I'm saying this with all due respect.

Sorry I simply don't trust her at all and do not want her as president. I'm okay with being bias and immature, but I'm not writing or sharing political articles, just sharing my opinion on them. If you can't write a professional article without making fun of someone then you shouldn't be doing it.

[Nemo 4,410]

10 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/5/11/1525428/-FEC-releases-damning-639-pages-of-violations-by-Bernie-Sanders-campaign

639 compared to Clinton and Trump's 10 or so

There's no justification for calling that "fraud". The worst you can say is that it's bad record-keeping.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 hour ago, Nemo said:

There's no justification for calling that "fraud". The worst you can say is that it's bad record-keeping.

Well that isn't the complete story.

He received several warnings and continued to ignore them. @Whispering has the articles.