Redstreak 6,653 Posted June 3, 2016 Author Share Posted June 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Oh I'm sorry I was referring to Sarandon as a dumbass not you I don't think you've said Trump is better than Clinton. I would hope not No, I'm not at that point yet. Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Oh my God you have such a victim complex it's so hilarious to witness lmao. I'm not trying to look smart. I was just making a silly comment. There was no way for me to know that. And I'm not playing a victim. You do twist things constantly, as pointed out by various members. You can do that as much as you want, but I will call you out on it. 2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Also it doesn't matter that he flip flops constantly. Yes it does lol For a good many issues. 6 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: You already have claimed to have anarchist leanings. I'm not going to contest your opinion that Clinton is worse. I dislike anarchy because I actually lived it for 18 years. You have no idea what it's like so I chalk it up to naivete. You don't know **** about my views so don't bring them up. I have absolutely zero interest in another one of your expositions on how Hillary is the best candidate. That's not even on the table rn, what is on the table rn is that you're unnecessarily dismissing a comment being made by a world-famous activist who's known for her political views and actions just because she's talking against your favorite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumpAteMyHeart 312 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Drag ha! Luv Susan! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Just now, Redstreak said: No, I'm not at that point yet. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 She's always been anti-party. Thus doesn't surprise me. She is pissed that her guy didn't get the nomination. She can go support a third party candidate, like she usually does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstreak 6,653 Posted June 3, 2016 Author Share Posted June 3, 2016 1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said: Learn to have at least a bit of a sense of humor Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 10 minutes ago, Didymus said: There was no way for me to know that. And I'm not playing a victim. You do twist things constantly, as pointed out by various members. You can do that as much as you want, but I will call you out on it. Um they think I twist what they say. Don't try to use group fallacies to justify anything. I'd give you a detailed description of how many arguments here go but I'm sure neither of us is in the mood for brutal destruction. 10 minutes ago, Didymus said: Yes it does lol For a good many issues. No it doesn't. This actually makes him far less predictable so counters cannot be taken appropriately. Furthermore, he has only flip flopped from supposedly liberal viewpoints to conservative ones. You're basically taking it out of context. He's becoming more and more of a threat to liberal ideologies as time goes on. This goes against anything Sanders stands for. Even he knows it. That this Susan Sarandon can't see that just shows how blind she is. 10 minutes ago, Didymus said: You don't know **** about my views so don't bring them up. I have absolutely zero interest in another one of your expositions on how Hillary is the best candidate. That's not even on the table rn, what is on the table rn is that you're unnecessarily dismissing a comment being made by a world-famous activist who's known for her political views and actions just because she's talking against your favorite. How ironic considering you keep bringing up other people's words to justify characterizations about me. Didymus you are such a hypocrite lmao. Tell me again how her being "World-famous" and participation in political affairs makes her any more likely to have a valid viewpoint as anyone else I pick off on the street? The biggest irony being you're using someone who's lived affluently as someone who understands what Bernie stands for. Are you simply using her status as a legitimacy argument? She can be as biased as the rest of them. Talk about a fallacy I can call her opinions idiotic based on any metric you can think of. Oh and she's not "talking about my favorite". She's employing the same hyperbole and lies that Bernie bots do on the daily. Perhaps that's why you see me commenting on her stupidity. Edit: Oh and by the way I made fun of Cher for slamming Sanders using BS in a thread a while back. Feel free to look it up Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 “No, but there’s going to be. There’s going to be. I mean, it’s inevitable,” Sarandon said, adding that “[W]e don’t know that he’s not going to get the numbers either,” referring to the number of delegates required for Sanders to clinch the Democratic nomination:" No, Susan, it is not inevitable. She sounds like the raving lunatics on Faux News. Yes, Susan, we do know that Bernie won't get the numbers to secure the nomination. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Just now, Whispering said: “No, but there’s going to be. There’s going to be. I mean, it’s inevitable,” Sarandon said, adding that “[W]e don’t know that he’s not going to get the numbers either,” referring to the number of delegates required for Sanders to clinch the Democratic nomination:" No, Susan, it is not inevitable. She sounds like the raving lunatics on Faux News. Yes, Susan, we do know that Bernie won't get the numbers to secure the nomination. No ... not even Fox News has called what Clinton has done illegal. This is actually an insult to Fox News She can fade back to irrelevance now. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Just now, LebaneseDude said: How ironic considering you keep bringing up other people's words to justify characterizations about me. Didymus you are such a hypocrite lmao. Oh boo hoo I only did that once and that was a couple of minutes ago lmfao you are such a ****ing loser man. How is that the same as making up a lie about me, saying I support anarchy when I ****ing told you an hour ago I don't. I'm only bringing it up because you're twisting **** again in this very thread! No one ever said her opinion was more relevant than yours, you were the one who said this thread shouldn't have been made because Susan is irrelevant, which she is not. Talk about pulling things out of context. Your opinion is already discussed ****ing 24/7 on this forum and you're gonna make that ridiculous "why is my opinion not as relevant as hers?" comment? Shut the **** up and make your 100th pro-Hillary/anti-Bernie/Trump thread for the day, let other people make theirs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Just now, Didymus said: Oh boo hoo I only did that once and that was a couple of minutes ago lmfao you are such a ****ing loser man. How is that the same as making up a lie about me, saying I support anarchy when I ****ing told you an hour ago I don't. I'm only bringing it up because you're twisting **** again in this very thread! No one ever said her opinion was more relevant than yours, you were the one who said this thread shouldn't have been made because Susan is irrelevant, which she is not. Talk about pulling things out of context. Your opinion is already discussed ****ing 24/7 on this forum and you're gonna make that ridiculous "why is my opinion not as relevant as hers?" comment? Shut the **** up and make your 100th pro-Hillary/anti-Bernie/Trump thread for the day, let other people make theirs. Um...fyi you're the one who engaged me so I'm not sure why you're trying to claim that I'm the one attacking you. You then blew a silly comment out of proportion and proceeded to rip my credentials. I don't know man. It seems you have a grudge You expressed your opinion about my opinion regarding Sarandon. I expressed my opinion on that. That's all there is to it. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewStevens 5,249 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 I'm not saying she is wrong but saying Hillary is more dangerous than Trump is only going to benefit Trump, it's not going to benefit your almost defeated favorite candidate. What does make people believe that making the opponent look bad is the key to make your candidate look good? That's not how things should be. I don't know what happened but lately everyone who publicly supports a candidate is acting like a desperate fool. Right now it seems like Hillary is getting the nomination so people are gonna have to decide between her and Trump. Those will be your only two options and if you don't support one of them then you will support the other. Politics are not a walk on the beach. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Just now, DrewStevens said: I'm not saying she is wrong but saying Hillary is more dangerous than Trump is only going to benefit Trump, it's not going to benefit your almost defeated favorite candidate. What does make people believe that making the opponent look bad is the key to make your candidate look good? That's not how things should be. I don't know what happened but lately everyone who publicly supports a candidate is acting like a desperate fool. Right now it seems like Hillary is getting the nomination so people are gonna have to decide between her and Trump. Those will be your only two options and if you don't support one of them then you will support the other. Politics are not a walk on the beach. Brutal Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,380 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 6 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Um...fyi you're the one who engaged me so I'm not sure why you're trying to claim that I'm the one attacking you. Re-read the damn convo, man. I just replied to you offering counter-arguments and then you ****ing had to jump at me saying I have a victim complex simply for calling you out on twisting the convo just so you can make one of your stupid "silly statements" again. And oh that's not enough, I'm also naive for personal views that have NOTHING to do with this thread or my posts in it. And then I'm a hypocrite too for some ludicrous reason you patched up, completely without accurate reference to the conversation. So no, that's not "all there is to it". If that's what was up, then you would've written completely different stuff. This act of yours is getting very tiresome. Don't ****ing bring up my off-topic personal views to diss me, don't twist my posts to be able to pretend you're "winning", don't call me a hypocrite when you don't have anything to base it on, don't act like you're not attacking people when you're dragging personal stuff into it when it's not necessary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 11 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: No ... not even Fox News has called what Clinton has done illegal. This is actually an insult to Fox News She can fade back to irrelevance now. I figured Hannity did, but maybe he understands the difference between breaking rules and breaking laws. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.