Trump will not debate Sanders

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

22 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said:

He is now winning nationally though. He was way below Hillary now they are almost tied. Over the next few months I expect his numbers to rise. He is going to be the next president

No he's not lmao.

Numbers mean nothing as they always have. It's like you haven't paid attention to previous elections.

By your logic Romney should have won the White House.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

17 minutes ago, Legalize Chris said:

I think a lot of people have underestimated Trump... it went from "He'll be out in a week, he couldn't win" to "Jeb/Cruz/Rubio/Carson/Fiorina'll stop him" to "Cruz/Rubio/Carson'll stop him" to "Cruz/Rubio'll stop him" to "Cruz'll stop him, he won't be the nominee" to being the nominee. Would not be surprised if all of America's closet racists pushed him into the White House. 

Not to mention that Hillary Clinton being a polarizing figure helps him considerably. If the Democrats had a stronger candidate (and not even Bernie, more of a 2008-Obama-unifier), then there wouldn't be a question, but too many people dislike Clinton. 

Would be great if people would stop bringing up the Republican clown car to justify Trump. Compared to Trump, most were downright worse. Rubio was a robot. Cruz was a theocratic despot in training. The only one that was remotely OK was Kasich but it was too late by then. It doesn't help that he's not memorable.

That you think Clinton being polarizing helps Trump, while ignoring the fact that Trump is the definition of polarizing is certainly odd. 

Re-evaluate your analytic process. The fact that Clinton is known and branded helps her. Trump has to dig up 25 year old scandals that people already know to touch her. This makes her uniquely suited to take on Trump. "Crooked" Hillary won't change anything. Those who dislike her already think she's crooked. Those who like her already know she isn't. Those who are in the fence already had those thoughts before Trump came along so there's no new information. Trump is struggling against Hillary.

[socotra 3,357]

9 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Would be great if people would stop bringing up the Republican clown car to justify Trump. Compared to Trump, most were downright worse. Rubio was a robot. Cruz was a theocratic despot in training. The only one that was remotely OK was Kasich but it was too late by then. It doesn't help that he's not memorable.

That you think Clinton being polarizing helps Trump, while ignoring the fact that Trump is the definition of polarizing is certainly odd. 

Re-evaluate your analytic process. The fact that Clinton is known and branded helps her. Trump has to dig up 25 year old scandals that people already know to touch her. This makes her uniquely suited to take on Trump. "Crooked" Hillary won't change anything. Those who dislike her already think she's crooked. Those who like her already know she isn't. Those who are in the fence already had those thoughts before Trump came along so there's no new information. Trump is struggling against Hillary.

Yeah, branded as a liar and full of shit lol 

Open your eyes to reality please. And stop replying to literally every single person who disagrees with you in a political topic. It's so ****ing annoying. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

5 minutes ago, Legalize Chris said:

Yeah, branded as a liar and full of **** lol 

Open your eyes to reality please. And stop replying to literally every single person who disagrees with you in a political topic. It's so ****ing annoying. 

The only thing that is annoying is you posting your ill-formed opinions in political threads.

This victim complex you have is grating. Grow a pair or put me on ignore.

[socotra 3,357]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

The only thing that is annoying is you posting your ill-formed opinions in political threads.

This victim complex you have is grating. Grow a pair or put me on ignore.

And you have deduced this from a handful of posts? Your hyperbole is humorous. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

2 minutes ago, Legalize Chris said:

And you have deduced this from a handful of posts? Your hyperbole is humorous. 

This is the third time you've said that I should "stop responding to everyone who posts".

What is there to deduce? You think I have it out for people who disagree with me or something. 

[socotra 3,357]

Just now, LebaneseDude said:

This is the third time you've said that I should "stop responding to everyone who posts".

What is there to deduce? You think I have it out for people who disagree with me or something. 

What is it then? Because can you argue that you aggressively respond to people in topics that disagree with you or dislike Hillary. There's a difference between being on a "crusade for truth" and just being straight-up annoying. It's not a crime to dislike Hillary. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

3 minutes ago, Legalize Chris said:

What is it then? Because can you argue that you aggressively respond to people in topics that disagree with you or dislike Hillary. There's a difference between being on a "crusade for truth" and just being straight-up annoying. It's not a crime to dislike Hillary. 

What the **** did I say about disliking Hillary? I don't care if you dislike her. I dislike your opinion and I provided a counter-argument because I disagreed with it. It's called having a conversation.

Aggressive? This is aggressive?

Spoiler

 

"Would be great if people would stop bringing up the Republican clown car to justify Trump. Compared to Trump, most were downright worse. Rubio was a robot. Cruz was a theocratic despot in training. The only one that was remotely OK was Kasich but it was too late by then. It doesn't help that he's not memorable.

That you think Clinton being polarizing helps Trump, while ignoring the fact that Trump is the definition of polarizing is certainly odd. 

Re-evaluate your analytic process. The fact that Clinton is known and branded helps her. Trump has to dig up 25 year old scandals that people already know to touch her. This makes her uniquely suited to take on Trump. "Crooked" Hillary won't change anything. Those who dislike her already think she's crooked. Those who like her already know she isn't. Those who are in the fence already had those thoughts before Trump came along so there's no new information. Trump is struggling against Hillary."

 

Literally the most aggressive thing I said was "re-evaluate your analytic process". If that's insulting then my god you have thin skin, especially when I provided context RIGHT AFTER for you to re-evaluate your analysis.

That you think I'm annoying sounds like a personal problem. Sorry if I follow up on statements I disagree with. You'd think we were on a forum as opposed to a blog.

Whatever.

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

The fact that people keep talking about how divisive Hillary is, even tho in most polls Donald is even more polarizing then she is is quite laughable honestly!!!

The only reason he is doing better in the polls is because the democrats are still divided, and the republicans are slowly coming around to Trump!

Also, he lies wayyyyyyy more than Hillary does.  Like almost everyday, multiple times a day actually.  

 

[socotra 3,357]

Just now, LebaneseDude said:

What the **** did I say about disliking Hillary? I don't care if you dislike her. I dislike your opinion and I provided a counter-argument because I disagreed with it.

Aggressive? This is aggressive?

  Hide contents

 

"Would be great if people would stop bringing up the Republican clown car to justify Trump. Compared to Trump, most were downright worse. Rubio was a robot. Cruz was a theocratic despot in training. The only one that was remotely OK was Kasich but it was too late by then. It doesn't help that he's not memorable.

That you think Clinton being polarizing helps Trump, while ignoring the fact that Trump is the definition of polarizing is certainly odd. 

Re-evaluate your analytic process. The fact that Clinton is known and branded helps her. Trump has to dig up 25 year old scandals that people already know to touch her. This makes her uniquely suited to take on Trump. "Crooked" Hillary won't change anything. Those who dislike her already think she's crooked. Those who like her already know she isn't. Those who are in the fence already had those thoughts before Trump came along so there's no new information. Trump is struggling against Hillary."

 

Literally the most aggressive thing I said was "re-evaluate your analytic process". If that's insulting then my god you have thin skin.

That you think I'm annoying sounds like a personal problem. 

Aggressive in the sense that you respond to a huge number of people in each thread. Not every single person is looking to incite an argument, not every single person wants to debate with you. You aggressively respond to people in that your presence in threads is suffocating because one can't have a conversation in a political thread without you piping in somehow and shoving Hillary Clinton down everyone's throats. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

7 minutes ago, Legalize Chris said:

Aggressive in the sense that you respond to a huge number of people in each thread. Not every single person is looking to incite an argument, not every single person wants to debate with you. You aggressively respond to people in that your presence in threads is suffocating because one can't have a conversation in a political thread without you piping in somehow and shoving Hillary Clinton down everyone's throats. 

Then why the hell are you picking an extremely aggressive argument with me you hypocrite? Don't respond if you don't want to debate with me. Feel free to wallow in your own echo chamber for all I care. 

Put me on ignore then. If you say something stupid I'm going to call you out on it. Feel free to do the same, just stick to the context of the post. Don't attack people's character and what they do with their time.

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

25 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

No he's not lmao.

Numbers mean nothing as they always have. It's like you haven't paid attention to previous elections.

By your logic Romney should have won the White House.

I think he will win. And the report that came out on Friday defiantly didn't help her.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

Just now, Gaga Monster said:

I think he will win. And the report that came out on Friday defiantly didn't help her.

Well it didn't help but it's not going to make a difference. Even Fox News couldn't spin it as a crime. She violated the rules not the law. That stuff gets her fired, not indicted. 

Think what you want. The numbers will change after the Democratic convention.

[Redstreak 6,653]

Oh well, the debate will happen anyway once Clinton is indicted and Sanders picks up the nomination

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

Just now, Redstreak said:

Oh well, the debate will happen anyway once Clinton is indicted and Sanders picks up the nomination

When even Fox News can't spin it this way but Sanders supporters can.