display name 4,360 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Well, she has already referred to Gaga as her (or Stefani's) creation, so I do not think that it is much different to say that she is a character. Regardless, it does not change or reduce what the woman has accomplished. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SILENT HILL 1,715 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Didn't she imply a few months ago that it was a character Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monsterish 5,520 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 I see Gaga as more of a persona. It's Stefani's way of embracing the part of her that society isn't fully willing to grasp in confidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernster7 7,922 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 I would not care at all, and I don't even understand why is that so important. Monsters never die. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Evans 8,917 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 hour ago, KURUSHITOVSKA said: She's always said that Gaga is just some way to express herself or something like that. Or her own work of art, it's not that Gaga is a character, it's that every era she acts some different way. Maybe something like "I created Gaga because Stefani wasn't brave enough" idk "In order to write ARTPOP I had to be willing to take off all the wigs and makeup that I used to cover up the pain.. and it's not that I don't love my wigs I am my hair- it's just that I used them for a long time to become different people so that when I woke up in the morning and didn't feel strong enough to be me I just created someone else." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatislaps 34,840 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 1 hour ago, PunkTheFunk said: Jamie: "Is Gaga a character?" Gaga & Jamie: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo 7,783 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 This interview looks awesome! Don't visit my profile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sipthistea 21,099 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Gaga is a Reverse Stefanian Expedition It's pretty obvious duhhh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandHeart 993 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 2 hours ago, kuntdiva said: So a new clip came out from the Actors on Actors which premiere's on PBS in June. Gaga gets interviewed by Jamie Lee Curtis and she asked the good sis "Is Gaga a character?" And Gaga's face... It could be editing but it got me wondering.. What if she said yes? Would you care? What are your thoughts on this... Don't worry it'll definitely be the editing. It always is the editig. We all know Gaga is always nothing but herself. Is she a performance artist? Yes. But that is who 'herself' is. Her life is a constant work of art, and what's amazing as that she executes it with more honesty than your average reality TV show. If you don't have shadows you're not standing in the light. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
REALITY 76,275 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I don't think that Gaga is necessarily a "character" for Stefani, but more like a vehicle to express herself. I don't recall what interview she said it in, but I remember her talking about how when she didn't feel brave or courageous enough, she would make these characters, and I guess Gaga was one of them. Sure, you could go ahead and say if Stefani made these "characters", and Gaga was one of them, then Gaga is a character. But I think that Gaga may have been some sort of persona in her early years (The Fame more so than any other era), but later on evolved into who she is. She's no longer just Stefani, she's Stefani and Gaga. 🦠🧙♀️🥀📸🎉👻🕺🧟💊💖☎️🔪👤🐺🌱🌎 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heavymetall0v3r 910 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I think GaGa always planned her name out carefully, despite what she says. "Lady GaGa" it's a name anyone can say, it's memorable, non-English speakers can remember it. I think it was formulated imo - perfect. But I doubt she really got that nickname. Starlight even said once that they brainstormed for it! #Character The angriest twink on GagaDaily. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankenztein 1,172 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 I don't think Gaga is a character. I think she created a new stronger braver version of herself and then she truly became it. Remember how evolution was a theme in the Bad Romance video, and in the first version of TMB? This is her telling her own life story. Stefani evolved into Gaga. Like a Pokemon evolution. I don't think the fact that Gaga was "created" contradicts it being the real her. In fact that's part of her message as an artist. You can become whoever you want to be just like she did. You can create a vision of yourself and embody it. No limits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meghan Trainor 34 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 7 hours ago, skeleton.gun said: i hope she says yes and gives a long monologue on performance art, method acting, as well as subject theory, and then concludes: so, basically, no. just to **** with your ARTPOPless heads. I died. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LilVenusian 579 Posted May 26, 2016 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.