freebit 6,240 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 3 minutes ago, SpaceAce said: You're right about them using Gaga's name for publicity. That's exactly what I assumed from the start, but that new THR article makes it sound like Gaga is to blame for a miscommunication - and Gaga's team hasn't responded to those claims yet. It just confused me. I do realize now after reading that Dionne admitted to not having a signed contract with Gaga that things are really fishy on her end. I never pictured Dionne Warwick to be a shark. It's a little bit beneath someone I would call a hero in music history. Anyhow, it would be really easy for Gaga or her team to clear all of this up once and for all. I'm not sure why it's taking so long. “Lady Gaga is not attached and will not appear in this project. Reports of Gaga starring in this project are false,” a representative for Lady Gaga told EW. http://www.ew.com/article/2016/05/13/lady-gaga-cilla-black-dionne-warwick-movie I'm not sure how much more clear one can be. Dionne & co. might have just jumped the gun or misconstrued things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewful2929 786 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 I dunno y'al, I don't think Diane would lie because it says she just confirmed it is true? I am so lost. How the hell can you not know who the hell is in a movie? I don't get it wtf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceAce 1,058 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Just now, freebit said: “Lady Gaga is not attached and will not appear in this project. Reports of Gaga starring in this project are false,” a representative for Lady Gaga told EW. http://www.ew.com/article/2016/05/13/lady-gaga-cilla-black-dionne-warwick-movie I'm not sure how much more clear one can be. Dionne & co. might have just jumped the gun or misconstrued things. I don't know why you're confused about this. That EW article is older than the THR article. Dionne responded to the claims that "Reports of Gaga starring in this project are false,” a representative for Lady Gaga told EW" by informing reporters that Gaga's team actually has it wrong. Read before coming at me, please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juanjo 2,151 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Ok, I'm so confused, and getting a bit tired of this. Is she, or is she not, in that movie!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AustrianTilapia 1,838 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 6 minutes ago, Domino said: I dunno y'al, I don't think Diane would lie because it says she just confirmed it is true? I am so lost. How the hell can you not know who the hell is in a movie? I don't get it wtf Dionne admitted that Gaga never signed a contract and that she never spoke to her, only her "manager". And she also said that only her music reps knew about it, not her movie reps. The only thing we've heard form Gaga's side is that she's not attached to the project and all the other conflicting info is coming out of Dionne's mouth. I'm getting fat and so is my bank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceAce 1,058 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 3 minutes ago, Juanjo said: Ok, I'm so confused, and getting a bit tired of this. Is she, or is she not, in that movie!? 1. Dionne Warwick and co. announce Gaga's involvement at their Cannes press release. 2. Gaga's film reps deny any involvement or knowledge of the project 3. Dionne Warwick tells reporters that there is a miscommunication between Gaga's people and that she was involved. 4. Dionne has also told reporters that Gaga hasn't signed a contract yet. 5. Dionne and Co. need to get their **** together. And Gaga's team needs to put this to bed once and for all. I hate that they're dragging her name around for press and blaming things on her. If Gaga was planning on joining but was currently undecided, I think today might convince her that these aren't the right people to work with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Evans 8,917 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 or there's someone out there claiming to be Gaga a la catfish Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Evans 8,917 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mus 7,883 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 I think that if Gaga was really going to be in this movie, she would have already confirmed somehow, like with a tweet or retweeting some article about it, like she usually do. What’s in a reverse-warholian expedition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebit 6,240 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Just now, SpaceAce said: I don't know why you're confused about this. That EW article is older than the THR article. Dionne responded to the claims that "Reports of Gaga starring in this project are false,” a representative for Lady Gaga told EW" by informing reporters that Gaga's team actually has it wrong. Read before coming at me, please. IDK, I'm more inclined to believe Gaga's PR team about Gaga's decisions rather than Dionne and the people involved with this movie. Gaga's actions speak louder than words if she hasn't signed on, nor gotten back with them. And what? I'm not coming at you, just replying to you and giving you my own interpretations about this subject. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewful2929 786 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Just now, Mustang07 said: I think that if Gaga was realy going to be in this movie, she would have already confirmed somehow, like with a tweet or retweeting some article about it, like she usually do. Maybe in the past. She barely tells us anything now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AustrianTilapia 1,838 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 4 minutes ago, Domino said: Maybe in the past. She barely tells us anything now She still retweets articles about herself all the time. Especially when news as big as this comes out. I mean, she literally announced the 5th season of AHS on her twitter, so that she could have control over it. And the fact that she's completely ignored it and tweeted other stuff in the mean time says a lot. I'm getting fat and so is my bank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighlandHeart 993 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 If you don't have shadows you're not standing in the light. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceAce 1,058 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 6 minutes ago, freebit said: IDK, I'm more inclined to believe Gaga's PR team about Gaga's decisions rather than Dionne and the people involved with this movie. Gaga's actions speak louder than words if she hasn't signed on, nor gotten back with them. And what? I'm not coming at you, just replying to you and giving you my own interpretations about this subject. Yeah except that's not what you were doing when you wrote, "I'm not sure how much more clear one can be. " You were just talking down to me as if I couldn't understand the (old) situation, though my comments were in reaction to the new articles and claims made by Dionne. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mus 7,883 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 1 minute ago, Domino said: Maybe in the past. She barely tells us anything now Yeah, but she always shows some sign or something. This is all being really confusing anyway, so I don't know what to expect What’s in a reverse-warholian expedition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.