Hillary Addresses Trump's Misogynist Comments.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

5 minutes ago, Goosey said:

Uh... no they don't. They do not "need" a woman president.

 No one said it was the only reason they support her. It may be a large factor.

Still the fact she's female will not get her as many women voters as the fact Obama was black got him African-American votes, but IIRC in Obama's case he didn't play "the black card" in the same way as Hillary has played "the woman card", that just happened naturally.

....I  was referring to the rights that they need. Clearly they don't "need" a woman president. Please stop taking my words out of context.

What constitutes naturally? She didn't force it. She never outright said "vote for me cause I'm a woman". She always said or implied to say: "Vote for me because I'm a woman and I will represent women's interests in office". 

What may or may not "feel" natural to you is nothing more than subjective bias.

[Whispering 18,865]

2 minutes ago, Himeros26 said:

No. That that evil woman pushed aside all of her morals to defend a rapist.

No, she was assigned the case. Defense lawyers defend murderers, rapists, and all sorts of criminals. Everyone in the US has a legal right to an attorney. 

 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

8 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Calling Trump a sexist isn't just about Hillary. He has included Hillary in his sexist remarks and he will continue to do so. He has a history of making these types of comments and he has directed these types of comments to female candidates and others in this election cycle. There is a definite reason why Trump's approval rating with women is so low. 

You know what's most sickening of all? I don't even believe Trump is as bad as he makes himself out to be. He may openly display misogyny but it doesn't necessarily mean he'll abuse that in office.

What's sickening is that he's a demagogue.

He's outright admitted to wanting to tone down his rhetoric in the general, by making the hilarious claim it's all for entertainment. So not only has he been lying to his constituents, he's been duping them all along. People who say "he tells like it is" were literally told that he's been telling them what they want to hear.

Yet they STILL want to vote for him. Tragic.

 

[Azor Ahai 18,861]

Well she does use the woman card ... Obama didn't use the "race" card , I've heard Hillary say in multiple instances say something like "time for a woman to take care of this country "or something like that. Her campaign slogan is literally "im with her" as if she is the only woman politician.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

52 minutes ago, Azor Ahai said:

Well she does use the woman card ... Obama didn't use the "race" card , I've heard Hillary say in multiple instances say something like "time for a woman to take care of this country "or something like that. Her campaign slogan is literally "im with her" as if she is the only woman politician.

Why would he? First of all he's biracial and was raised by his white mother and grandparents after his father ditched them. He wasn't raised in the same environment, and he doesn't have the same experiences. In fact, many parts of the black community often times pushed him away by taking offense at him calling himself black. 

That isn't the point though. The point is that he attributed himself to many African american organizations, and made many speeches about inequalities in civil liberties and divisiveness in America. so played the race card through implication and through generalization.

Hillary is running with women's rights firmly on her agenda. It is exactly what she's fighting for, along with children's rights, her entire life. She has faced the same struggles as any woman in America, magnified by her status and the scrutiny she faces.

Surrogate representation is a thing. Women constitute the majority of the electorate. Most of the issues they fight for aren't general notions like civil liberty. Men and women do not experience the same issues, independent of race. The majority of elected members are men, making decisions that do not affect them directly. Hillary is there to say that for once there will be a president who puts women's rights front and center. Is that so bad? 

If you think that's bad, then once again let me remind you that as many people will be affected by advancing women's rights as economic reform for the working class. (50%ish of the population) Yet for some reason, you are fine with Bernie making himself an economic messiah. . When it comes to gender however, suddenly there's pause. In fact, people don't mind that he plays the class card. However Hillary apparently identify herself as a woman. Why?

Oh and you are making an unfortunate sexist implication when talking about "I'm with her" being divisive. 

Let me ask you a question. If he slogan was "I'm with him" would you have an issue?

No. It's the fact that her being a woman makes her an exception to the rule is what makes you feel weird about it. Think about it.

[JbGaga 2,261]

21 hours ago, Whispering said:

My comment wasn't in a report...

 

Well find me some proof or its false.

[Guest]

15 hours ago, Himeros26 said:

I trust it just about as much as I trust the political system that includes superdeleagtes who work for HilLiary, or the banks that support HilLiary. 

Then that's even worse? 

You quote me in every damn thread calling me mysogynist and sexist when you don't even know me or who I am so you can take several seats 

When have I called you that?