Does Gaga have time to handle movies + music?

[Didymus 34,380]

Just now, Tom Hardy said:

Unnecessary remarks.

I guess my egotistic self is still pressed you left two conversations in the past week after throwing unnecessary personal remarks my way.

And I just personally find it crazy how hung up you are on awards. Even the idea of her hanging out with an Oscar nominee is enough to trip you up. Don't forget that your way of silencing me the other day was to state that a Grammy win over Beyoncé would prove me wrong about everything I said.

I am very excited for Gaga to make movies more seriously, but I'm already dreading the awards bs that's gonna get dragged into it on this forum. The idea you presented of Gaga taking on a role just to get an Oscar nomination is enough to make me cringe.

Just now, Tom Hardy said:

What I had in mind was three to four months, not a year, just pointing that out, never disagreed with the fact that she can still make/promote music in the meantime.

You didn't even mention rehearsals, so I still don't get what you mean with "research", and going to meetings for awards that could take so long. But anyway, my post was in response to Red who said she couldn't tour anymore if she started to make movies, so what's your stance on that then?

[Bradley 59,157]

18 minutes ago, Didymus said:

I guess my egotistic self is still pressed you left two conversations in the past week after throwing unnecessary personal remarks my way.

And I just personally find it crazy how hung up you are on awards. Even the idea of her hanging out with an Oscar nominee is enough to trip you up. Don't forget that your way of silencing me the other day was to state that a Grammy win over Beyoncé would prove me wrong about everything I said.

I am very excited for Gaga to make movies more seriously, but I'm already dreading the awards bs that's gonna get dragged into it on this forum. The idea you presented of Gaga taking on a role just to get an Oscar nomination is enough to make me cringe.

You didn't even mention rehearsals, so I still don't get what you mean with "research", and going to meetings for awards that could take so long. But anyway, my post was in response to Red who said she couldn't tour anymore if she started to make movies, so what's your stance on that then?

I have put what happened last week behind, can't you do the same? No need to bring that into this new conversation. Honestly you make me consider leaving this forum. I feel like I am being attacked for whatever I say, even if those are neutral remarks (like I get criticised for feeling excited for a new project and potential awards).

GGD expresses excitement in an exaggerated manner, that was just a figurative expression (media reporters tend to write articles as in 'the Grammy winning singer Lady Gaga' 'the Oscar winning actor Bradley Cooper, I was just emulating them, maybe I wrote it badly but need you point it out to my detriment). Everyone loves recognition, that includes our favs. There are of course exceptions like you but know that just because you don't value Oscars, Grammys or Golden Globes doesn't mean all who see some value in the trophies are people with sh1tty opinions.

The bolded part: No, I love movies a lot more than you think and I watch tons of movies that are nominated for nothing, so don't you question my passion for movies and actors/actresses by saying I only want Gaga to get an Oscar, because that is not true at all. I enjoy seeing Gaga in a movie with Bradley Cooper, an actor I am fond of, what is wrong in that?

[Didymus 34,380]

Just now, Tom Hardy said:

I have put what happened last week behind, can't you do the same? No need to bring that into this new conversation.

Except I didn't. You mentioned Oscars in your OP and in your reply to me, that was all I meant, you had to call it "unnecessary remarks".

And, well, that's easy to say if you just leave a conversation while I feel hurt and don't get a reply after I try to stand up for myself. No I didn't leave that behind me and I won't because you left the conversation(s) an open wound. But again, I didn't bring it up and even in the post you're now replying to I only made a passing comment in jest about it. Don't bring the drama when I didn't do ****.

1 minute ago, Tom Hardy said:

The bolded part

Hold up, I was just responding to something you literally wrote:

"but Gaga would need to do lots of research and will for sure be very committed to the role, she has to attend meetings, etc. with people, if she were to take on a lead role that is intended to be submitted to the Oscars for nomination consideration (in contrast with more commercial roles which do not require that much skill)"

That's what that was about. Never did I imply anything about your movie taste or taste in general, but ok. You're the one who's getting attacked for saying neutral stuff. Again, like I told you in other threads: stop assuming you know my opinion on things. There's no hidden message in my posts and I take my opinion as seriously as I take others': not so much. Don't worry about that.

And oh, no reply to my question. K.

Lemme try again then: my post you quoted in the beginning was about how Gaga could, in my opinion, perfectly combine touring with making movies and didn't need to give up one or the other. You replied with something I interpreted as saying you agreed with Red, but then it turns out you didn't, so I'm asking you again: what's your stance there then, 'cause that's what my original post was about

[Bradley 59,157]

1 minute ago, Didymus said:

Except I didn't. You mentioned Oscars in your OP and in your reply to me, that was all I meant, you had to call it "unnecessary remarks".

I guess my egotistic self is still pressed you left two conversations in the past week after throwing unnecessary personal remarks my way. - by you

I called it 'unnecessary remarks' because you wrote these:

Not surprised you're focusing on the Oscar again. Tragic.

Be honest and tell me, did you think I would be pleased to see that?

[Bradley 59,157]

8 minutes ago, Didymus said:

And, well, that's easy to say if you just leave a conversation while I feel hurt and don't get a reply after I try to stand up for myself. No I didn't leave that behind me and I won't because you left the conversation(s) an open wound. But again, I didn't bring it up and even in the post you're now replying to I only made a passing comment in jest about it. Don't bring the drama when I didn't do ****.

What was I supposed to do? My parents taught me that, in a disagreement, to endeavour to leave things behind and stop the argument for further peace. We argued a lot. We could go on up to 10 pages, and I didn't want that. I felt tired doing that, I'm sure you didn't enjoy it either. Someone had to stop.

[Didymus 34,380]

4 minutes ago, Tom Hardy said:

...

Well, first you say don't bring it in and now you're not even trying to be on-topic anymore. Taking it to a PM, you can reply if you want to, but let's not continue here pls

[Bradley 59,157]

17 minutes ago, Didymus said:

Hold up, I was just responding to something you literally wrote:

"but Gaga would need to do lots of research and will for sure be very committed to the role, she has to attend meetings, etc. with people, if she were to take on a lead role that is intended to be submitted to the Oscars for nomination consideration (in contrast with more commercial roles which do not require that much skill)"

You said I wanted Gaga to work with Bradley just for an Oscar, that's not true at all. I wanted to see her work with Bradley because I feel happy seeing two actors I like working together, simple as that.

That line you bolded that I wrote simply made a categorisation between roles which are commercial-based and award-based (like those which Leonardo DiCaprio, Bradley Cooper usually take on). I was saying

'If Gaga wanted to, as opposed to taking on a role from a commercial movie, take on one which is more Oscar inclined...'

then you said what I wrote was enough to make you cringe and I was like 'what did I do?'

[Bradley 59,157]

50 minutes ago, Didymus said:

You didn't even mention rehearsals, so I still don't get what you mean with "research", and going to meetings for awards that could take so long. But anyway, my post was in response to Red who said she couldn't tour anymore if she started to make movies, so what's your stance on that then?

I was actually agreeing with you, it seemed like I agreed with Red because I thought instead of 60 days, it could take more than that because you mentioned only 'shooting', I simply included pre-filming stages into your point that could entail Gaga's involvement.

and no, I don't want to take it to PM. I'm quite tired of our antagonistic exchanges. I really hope we can put what happened last week (and a few minutes ago ) behind.

[Didymus 34,380]

Just now, Tom Hardy said:

and no, I don't want to take it to PM.

Wow.

Just now, Tom Hardy said:

I really hope we can put what happened last week (and a few minutes ago ) behind.

By not talking about it.. lol yeah, I'm not ok with that. You hurt my feelings twice in a very short time and you don't even care, leaving conversations and shutting others off, not even when I'm telling you directly.

So I guess that's it. Don't interact with me again pls.

[Duella Dvil 10,517]

Scroll through Madonna's career...

Yeah, Gaga can.

After one of Madonna's Sticky and Sweet Dancers said GAGA is a harder worker, I believe that anything M can do, Gaga can top it.

This is come from a huge Madonna Stan 

[Bradley 59,157]

13 minutes ago, Didymus said:

Wow.

By not talking about it.. lol yeah, I'm not ok with that. You hurt my feelings twice in a very short time and you don't even care, leaving conversations and shutting others off, not even when I'm telling you directly.

So I guess that's it. Don't interact with me again pls.

I thought it was the best for the both of us, instead of dwelling in the (unpleasant) past, we move on and try in having casual interactions with no hard feelings for each other, starting from this point, and try to avoid intense and potentially discussions of such nature again (at least from my part, but I can't do that if you keep holding in mind my 'abrupt leave' last week), no?

You mistaken my inaction as being negative towards you. I think we have conflicting objectives here. I want to move on and forget about it while you want to go back and remedy our abrupt endings last week. I'm sorry if I've hurt your feelings but I didn't want to bring it to PM but that's because I expected that to be another long argument between us, I didn't know how you were going to react in the PM and what you wanted to achieve, whether you want to continue this discussion or remedy our hard feelings resulted from last week. I apologize for last week but I was very much offended by how I was treated too, which is why I chose not to bring the issue further (now and before).

[MaryJaneHolland 77,348]

35 minutes ago, Uncle ARTPOP said:

Scroll through Madonna's career...

Yeah, Gaga can.

After one of Madonna's Sticky and Sweet Dancers said GAGA is a harder worker, I believe that anything M can do, Gaga can top it.

This is come from a huge Madonna Stan 

That's what i was about to say 

But I want a documentary more. Like Madonna did. 

[PopThatArt 2,193]

The real question, can she squeeze it all in before having a kid and disappearing for a couple years to raise dem babies? 

[Mikey Monster 1,561]

6 hours ago, Iwontell said:

I think Gaga is a smart girl and has realized that if you want to sustain a music career and be on control of it, write your material, evolve from project to project, etc., you'll need breaks in between cycles, you'll need time...but she also knows that, at the same time, just being completely away from the media is not great, bc today there are more "celebrities" than ever before (bc reality shows, youtubers, bloggers, viral video ppl, etc.) and everyone is looking for someone new and interesting, so if you're not around ppl will look elsewhere for entertainment and you can fade away really fast, ppl will lose interest...and I think there's where acting and singing jazz come in.

Not to say that she doesn't love to do those things...I just think that even if she hadn't done those things, it doesn't mean she'd have a new album out by now, and had she gone away entirely since ARTPOP, she'd have a really bad time making a comeback...all that's to say: I don't think one thing interferes that much on the other...I think they, in a way, reinforce each other and allow her build a more sustainable/stable career...

EDIT: also I think this will help her be a mother without "going away"...bc you won't put on a pop concert or do heavy promotion while pregnant or raising tiny, young babies, but you can definitely sing jazz pregnant, you can act while pregnant, you can do a TV series and be around for your 1 y.o. baby, bc there's a schedule that you can rely on...

That's what is so great about Gaga she can do everything she is so talented. She will always be around. ❤️❤️❤️