Bernie Sanders Drops Frivolous Lawsuit Against DNC

[Born To Slay 10,996]

5 minutes ago, chrismugler said:

Interesting..... He should drop out of the race already tbh

He's going to the convention where he will fight with every morsel of his being to be the nom. 

[Bebe 17,289]

"So basically he was guilty for breaching ethics and the DNC contract and lied about it, and then when the investigation was concluded he lied about its results."

You are completely twisting his.

 

"In fact, the independent investigation has confirmed what the Sanders campaign said from the start:

The DNC’s security failures allowed four Sanders campaign staffers – three junior-level staffers led by a manager who had been hired at the recommendation of the DNC and who was immediately terminated after the incident – to have extremely short-lived access for one hour to Hillary for America’s scoring models, but not to any of Hillary for America’s proprietary voter data.

No one else in the Sanders campaign, outside these four staffers, accessed the Hillary for America’s scoring models or had knowledge that the activity was taking place until well after the incident was over.

With one exception, all unauthorized access took place within the DNC’s own system. While there is evidence that the terminated staffer may have exported a summary data table, the independent investigation of Sanders campaign computers could not locate that file and no one in the Sanders campaign has ever seen that file."


What exactly are you trying to nail him for? Do you really think he knew what four junior level staffers were doing? This is more irrelevant than Hillary's email controversy 

[Himeros26 1,688]

1 hour ago, LebaneseDude said:

You don't care that he breached trust, lied about it, and then lied again about the results?

Fascinating

Hehe just messing.

I'll care when you care about HilLiary's lies. That's a lot of lies for you, tho.

[lego 44,165]

47 minutes ago, Himeros26 said:

I'll care when you care about HilLiary's lies. That's a lot of lies for you, tho.

 

My fav lie was when she "landed under sniper fire" in Bosnia. That was pretty edgy.

 

[Whispering 18,865]

3 hours ago, Born To Slay said:

He's going to the convention where he will fight with every morsel of his being to be the nom. 

Every morsel of his being won't get him more votes, more states or more pledged delegates. He won't be the nominee. 

[Squidward T 2,470]

I still take him over that rotten lying manipulative sHILL 

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

32 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Every morsel of his being won't get him more votes, more states or more pledged delegates. He won't be the nominee. 

This though. It's basically a fact Hillary is the nominee. At this point as a supporter I'm just interested in how far he'll get delegate wise and especially how it will go in California.

But it's so obvious (if you do the math) that on June 7 both Hillary and Trump will obtain the needed delegates to become the nominees. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

3 hours ago, Bebe said:

"So basically he was guilty for breaching ethics and the DNC contract and lied about it, and then when the investigation was concluded he lied about its results."

You are completely twisting his.

 

"In fact, the independent investigation has confirmed what the Sanders campaign said from the start:

The DNC’s security failures allowed four Sanders campaign staffers – three junior-level staffers led by a manager who had been hired at the recommendation of the DNC and who was immediately terminated after the incident – to have extremely short-lived access for one hour to Hillary for America’s scoring models, but not to any of Hillary for America’s proprietary voter data.

No one else in the Sanders campaign, outside these four staffers, accessed the Hillary for America’s scoring models or had knowledge that the activity was taking place until well after the incident was over.

With one exception, all unauthorized access took place within the DNC’s own system. While there is evidence that the terminated staffer may have exported a summary data table, the independent investigation of Sanders campaign computers could not locate that file and no one in the Sanders campaign has ever seen that file."


What exactly are you trying to nail him for? Do you really think he knew what four junior level staffers were doing? This is more irrelevant than Hillary's email controversy 

What makes you think he didn't?

You have no proof otherwise except their word, so don't try to base your assumptions as fact either. 

In any case the entire point is that he lied about his campaign's involvement and about the involvement of the other nominees. Now his campaign is employing misdirection against the results to make the people look at it at a skewed light. Tell me...why would he suddenly drop the lawsuit? There's more than we know and we'll never know.

Considering that my entire point is to humanize Sanders, I'm glad you agree that this is as irrelevant as the emails. It's a ****up, one that happens a lot when you don't have complete control over your subordinates or plans. One that many Bernie supporters feel obliged to connect with Hillary's competence. 

So...thanks for agreeing with me. 

[Whispering 18,865]

3 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

This though. It's basically a fact Hillary is the nominee. At this point as a supporter I'm just interested in how far he'll get delegate wise and especially how it will go in California.

But it's so obvious (if you do the math) that on June 7 both Hillary and Trump will obtain the needed delegates to become the nominees. 

Trump might be a few short...maybe. If they deny him the nominee, I can't imagine what will happen...inside and outside the convention center! 

[JevyDuty 2,961]

25 minutes ago, Squidward T said:

I still take him over that rotten lying manipulative sHILL 

 

3 hours ago, Himeros26 said:

I'll care when you care about HilLiary's lies. That's a lot of lies for you, tho.

The name calling by you Bernie stans show how young and immature you guys are. Make your point without the theatrics. If you were confident in your point, then you wouldn't resort to petty name calling.

[Himeros26 1,688]

2 minutes ago, Larry Hill said:

 

The name calling by you Bernie stans show how young and immature you guys are. Make your point without the theatrics. If you were confident in your point, then you wouldn't resort to petty name calling.

Oh no honey I'm very confident which is why I do refer to HilLiary as such.

She's a compulsive liar and her record (which she so anxiously wants everyone to refer to) is the ultimate proof 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

7 minutes ago, Larry Hill said:

 

The name calling by you Bernie stans show how young and immature you guys are. Make your point without the theatrics. If you were confident in your point, then you wouldn't resort to petty name calling.

You can't teach people to not be immature over the Internet. Don't bother.

[PartySick 172,495]

9 hours ago, LebaneseDude said:

I wonder why the Bernie supporters on GGD are not justifying his innocence.

Is it perhaps because they have dumped him in favor of Jill Stein? Such fickle allegiances 

Anyone who votes for a 3rd party member is just wasting their vote tbh. Not enough people will do it to make a real difference, unfortunately. *insert mumbo jumbo about the democrat and republican parties having a strangle hold on our political freedom*

I'm still for Bernie 100% of the way but I'll be damned if I'm going to contribute to a Republican win  Hillary may be bad in certain ways, but she's leagues ahead of Cruz and Trump.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

Just now, PartySick said:

Anyone who votes for a 3rd party member is just wasting their vote tbh. Not enough people will do it to make a real difference, unfortunately. *insert mumbo jumbo about the democrat and republican parties having a strangle hold on our political freedom*

I'm still for Bernie 100% of the way but I'll be damned if I'm going to contribute to a Republican win  Hillary may be bad in certain ways, but she's leagues ahead of Cruz and Trump.

Well I wouldn't say anyone.

If they're in predominantly red or blue states, then they can afford to vote for what they wish. If the total reaches 5%, the Green Party can become eligible for federal funding. It's a big deal. Of course, them being capable of reaching that number is another thing entirely.

Swing states are another matter.

[Didymus 34,380]

9 minutes ago, Himeros26 said:

She's a compulsive liar and her record (which she so anxiously wants everyone to refer to) is the ultimate proof 

Cackling.