MJHolland 12,725 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: You're being blatantly dismissive of the fact that this event occured at a women's conference. The topic was "who would be best for fighting for women's rights abroad". Laura said Hillary would be better than Trump. That's her opinion. Do you think she's wrong, on this particular issue? Do you have anything of value to add, cause all you're doing is bitching right now about topics that are irrelevant in some desperate attempt to shade her. I never made a comment about to (maybe) endorsement, I couldn't care less. She's more irrelevant than Michele Bachmann. We can all come to our own conclusions about Laura's judgement too... she did choose to marry George W. Bush tho... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, MJHolland said: I never made a comment about to (maybe) endorsement, I couldn't care less. She's more irrelevant than Michele Bachmann. We can all come to our own conclusions about Laura's judgement too... she did choose to marry George W. Bush tho... Sure, but the point I was making was that context matters, and you're blatantly ignoring that fact. Judge her if you want. The entire point of this "endorsement" (not really one) is that Hillary has a better record for women's rights. Judging by her career, it's clear she will continue to do work in that field as she has done throughout her life, irrespective of all other aspects you are so adamant on criticizing. Furthermore, attempting to misdirect the topic to the the woman's credentials is as hilarious as an ad hominem attack can get. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted April 10, 2016 Author Share Posted April 10, 2016 8 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: @Morphine Prince So apparently you agree that women's rights abroad is a trivial matter. It's good to see how knowledgeable you are, given that your posts are deceptively moderate. I liked his post for the part regarding me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Just now, Morphine Prince said: I liked his post for the part regarding me. Well I'm glad I'm wrong. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 4 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: I liked his post for the part regarding me. Although implying that women vote for Hillary because they too have a vagina is as sexist as you can get. That they vote for her because she may help them in regards to women's rights is no different than voting for Bernie because his economic policies may benefit them. Frankly this whole line of logic is tragic. If it's a joke it's a very dismissive one, but I'm not here to judge senses of humor. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted April 10, 2016 Author Share Posted April 10, 2016 Just now, LebaneseDude said: Although implying that women vote for Hillary because they too have a vagina is as sexist as you can get. That they vote for her because she may help them in regards to women's rights is no different than voting for Bernie because his economic policies may benefit them. It's a joke coming from another thread. It's not serious at all (at least I'm not serious) Calm down #BeADickVoteForTrump #VoteWithYourVagVoteHRC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: It's a joke coming from another thread. It's not serious at all (at least I'm not serious) Calm down #BeADickVoteForTrump #VoteWithYourVagVoteHRC I see. No worries I'm not worked up. I was just confused so I'm just trying to understand the context. #FeelTheBernGetSTDChecksToday Did I do that right? Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted April 10, 2016 Author Share Posted April 10, 2016 Just now, LebaneseDude said: I see. No worries I'm not worked up. I was just confused so I'm just trying to understand the context. #FeelTheBernGetSTDChecksToday Did I do that right? OMG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 16 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Sure, but the point I was making was that context matters, and you're blatantly ignoring that fact. Judge her if you want. The entire point of this "endorsement" (not really one) is that Hillary has a better record for women's rights. Judging by her career, it's clear she will continue to do work in that field as she has done throughout her life, irrespective of all other aspects you are so adamant on criticizing. Furthermore, attempting to misdirect the topic to the the woman's credentials is as hilarious as an ad hominem attack can get. 11 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Although implying that women vote for Hillary because they too have a vagina is as sexist as you can get. That they vote for her because she may help them in regards to women's rights is no different than voting for Bernie because his economic policies may benefit them. Frankly this whole line of logic is tragic. If it's a joke it's a very dismissive one, but I'm not here to judge senses of humor. Omfg lol you are so damn extra. How come Sanders supporters can take jokes but Hillary ones can't? Aren't they supposed to be the bleeding-heart liberals?! You guys confuse me so much, especially when you think it's a good idea to elect a person president who in the past compromised national security for their convenience... I less interested with who's going to be best for (insert special interest here). I care who is going to be the best for the most amount of people, which includes all minorities. Even if Clinton's foreign policy saved the lives of 10,000 women in Afghanistan, the rest of her failed strategy allowed ISIS to form terrorist cells in Iraq under the leader she advised to be installed in the country and now we're all f*cked. Well, I guess those woman in the middle east she was so good to 4 years ago are now alive today to be sold into slavery as an ISIS bride...... Awk... #CumSupportCruz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 27 minutes ago, MJHolland said: Omfg lol you are so damn extra. How come Sanders supporters can take jokes but Hillary ones can't? Aren't they supposed to be the bleeding-heart liberals?! You guys confuse me so much, especially when you think it's a good idea to elect a person president who in the past compromised national security for their convenience... I less interested with who's going to be best for (insert special interest here). I care who is going to be the best for the most amount of people, which includes all minorities. Even if Clinton's foreign policy saved the lives of 10,000 women in Afghanistan, the rest of her failed strategy allowed ISIS to form terrorist cells in Iraq under the leader she advised to be installed in the country and now we're all f*cked. Well, I guess those woman in the middle east she was so good to 4 years ago are now alive today to be sold into slavery as an ISIS bride...... Awk... #CumSupportCruz But it wasn't her foreign policy. It was Obama's. Why do you forget that fact? Oh and I'm not being extra. I've heard that from line of thinking from many people. I also didn't know the context. I can do it to Spoiler #ClitsForClinton See? Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 6 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: But it wasn't her foreign policy. It was Obama's. Why do you forget that fact? Oh and I'm not being extra. I've heard that from line of thinking from many people. I also didn't know the context. I can do it to Hide contents #ClitsForClinton See? She was SoS, she was literally in charge of the administrations foreign policy... Also nice hashtag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 2 minutes ago, MJHolland said: She was SoS, she was literally in charge of the administrations foreign policy... Also nice hashtag She was in charge of fulfilling the policy, not deciding it. She did her job. It ultimately failed because of Obama's bad decision-making when it came to many aspects of Middle Eastern foreign policy. Do you not agree with that sentiment in this regard? Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,725 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Just now, LebaneseDude said: She was in charge of fulfilling the policy, not deciding it. If that's how you justify the world that is on fire today, so be it... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Just now, MJHolland said: If that's how you justify the world that is on fire today, so be it... I'm not justifying it. I'm just saying that the blame is being misplaced. You don't shoot the messenger. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.