Huffington Post Predicts Trump Will Win Presidency (By a landslide)

[LanasNerfGun 4,679]

It's still too early in the race to tell imo.  Also, according to CNN which tends to swing towards the conservative side:

[venusfly 17,885]

2 minutes ago, LanasNerfGun said:

It's still too early in the race to tell imo.  Also, according to CNN which tends to swing towards the conservative side:

Gaga was listed as having an 80-90% chance of winning her oscar .

[Eighteen 5,430]

20 minutes ago, Rising said:

Right-leaning Independents will gravitate toward Trump. 

ew. this isn't a time for party politics imo. if trump were a democrat saying this **** regarding muslims and promoting violence and racism etc etc and was the nominee i would ****ing vote republican even though i'm a democrat. 

 

 

[Bt1 5,213]

19 minutes ago, Rising said:

Right. So this idea that "Bernie is helping the republicans at this point" needs to stop. This is more directed at the media than at you personally. 

It's hypocritical considering that Hillary pushed her losing campaign all the way to the end in 2008. Did it hurt Obama? Was it even an issue? No, because Obama was a great candidate.  

Its a little bit different. Obama never had this lead.

Tbh I blame the most whoever made the democratic election schedule. You cant put California so far behind.

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,366]

7 hours ago, Rising said:

Don't blame Bernie for Hilary's shortcomings. Hilary's loss will be because she simply wasn't good enough. Right-leaning Independents will gravitate toward Trump. 

It's so convenient to say he should drop out when half of the country hasn't even voted yet and he's winning by landslides now. 

Even tho I am sure when Hillary was winning in landslides, you were silent as can be or complaining...  JS

[chrismugler 944]

Not true at all. Hillary will win the general election because you'll see a lot of support coming in the next months and a lot hate towards Trump. If Bernie gets the nomination (which won't happen, I'm sure) the ultra-conservative people in the US will absolutely vote for Trump because Sanders is too liberal. 

[PopBitch 1,218]

Nope.  The votes against Trump will be astounding.  Him being the Republican nominee will drive a massive Democratic voter turnout.

[LeoFameMonster 1,592]

17 hours ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

I actually agree with most of that, except him winning of course and the Bernie part.  How can you say that Hillary would lose because of skeletons in her closet that have yet to come out, but then turn around and say Bernie would win even though he is barely known at all…???! 

Funny thing is Hillary had to go to trail and has been dragged through the dirt my Republicans. Simply because they fear her! they are right in doing so. In dragging her through the dirt most, if not all, her "skeletons" came out.

Now trump hasn't had that happen to him yet. Which is why he is hiding is financial records. He must have a huge amount of secrets. I am sure they will be dragged out during the race.

How ironic that he demanded to see obama's birth certificate and doesn't even release his financial records

 

[pie-kun 1,765]

This article has so many lies I don't even have time to point them all out

"Hillary Clinton’s main advantage with regards to winning the nomination is not public sentiment, but instead, due to unelected superdelegates"

This is so blatantly false it's laughable. Hillary Clinton currently has a 200+ lead on Sanders in pledged delegate counts, the delegates that get allocated based on how the people voted, and this is without counting the high delegate states coming up that she will do well in, such as New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. It's particularly a bad claim given that Sanders has said in recent weeks that if Hillary leads Sanders in pledged delegates at the convention that the superdelegates should override the voters and pick him. The only person that has advocated subverting the will of the people in this race is Bernie Sanders.

"Second, Trump has consistently confounded polls and projections that predicted he could never win"

Yeah, and he also lost in MANY contests that polling expected him to win, Iowa and Oklahoma being two examples. The idea that Trump consistently outperforms his polling is false, if anything he probably underperforms more.

"Delegate Map, Clinton v. Trump"

This whole section is trying to use Primary results to try to predict general election results, which is just ridiculous. There is no correlation. Primaries/Caucuses involve a much, much smaller number of people voting and those people tend to be much more politically active than general election voters are. 

"A large number of Democrats cannot bring themselves to vote for Hillary Clinton under any circumstances"

An even larger number cannot bring themselves to vote for Bernie Sanders, which is why Hillary is winning and why this talking point is nonsense.

It's simply unbelievable to me that someone can be paid to write something so full of ignorance and falsehoods. More shocking is the number of people who read this and swallow it because it agrees with their pre-conceived world notion, then a minute later will make fun of other people for doing the same thing with Fox News.

[Sister 9,907]

Some people just can't see the forest for the trees.

[Redstreak 6,653]

19 hours ago, shane_c said:

This is not the Huffington Post, its just some far leftist that wrote a column. Its his views, not theirs.

Imo Hillary would beat Trump fairly easily, Sanders would lose. Sanders is too far left to beat almost anybody. He'd be like Mondale and McGovern.

Sanders is ahead of every candidate in every reputable bipartisan poll

[thefamebitch 834]

Only in America do people believe in someone who is "against" illegal immigration, yet that very candidate fueled the flames of illegal immigration by employing them to build his tower in Chicago.... lol.  

****ing stupid people, if they'd open their eyes they'd see that Trump has benefitted off of illegals just as much as any other big business in the US.  

[Chromatica 7,042]

1 hour ago, PopBitch said:

Nope.  The votes against Trump will be astounding.  Him being the Republican nominee will drive a massive Democratic voter turnout.

You could EASILY say the same thing about Hillary.