RAMROD 109,957 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Just now, malazam said: Taylor? What? so they're buying them to have the rights over that songs?? Yes. If it is fully in Sony hands after this, they don't have to share toyalties with MJ estate anymore for using it in any ways. Nightmare tbh. (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ hating pop music doesn't make you deep (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
malazam 15,710 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, RAMROD said: Yes. If it is fully in Sony hands after this, they don't have to share toyalties with MJ estate anymore for using it in any ways. Nightmare tbh. I don't they're going to use them but they're going to take advantage for sure another shot before we kiss the other side Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrer Zorola 3,966 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 what does this mean...? what is Sony going to be able to do now? LIFE IS GOOD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thierryrreiht 21,065 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Maximizing value for the children?! aren't they multi-millionaires already?! shame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I'm not quite sure why people are upset. He purchased music and now his estate is selling it. As a matter of fact Paul McCartney was mad at him for outbidding him for the Beatle's catalog. It's not MJ's personal works that are being sold. He was a brilliant business man. Beats by Dre made him about 600 million. The MJ estate is selling the music catalog for 750 Million and his estate still has a stake (part ownership) of Sony Music Publishing for heavens sake. 🤑 "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 161,505 Posted March 16, 2016 Author Share Posted March 16, 2016 2 hours ago, just4fun said: As a matter of fact Paul McCartney was mad at him for outbidding him for the Beatle's catalog. Mm I remember something about this. Michael asked Paul if he was going to bid because he didn't want to pull the rug out from under him (or something along those lines). They were friends-ish, ya know? Paul had his lawyers respond saying that he wasn't so Michael went ahead. Then Paul tried to hit up Yoko Ono to "go halfsies" on it because he was "too cheap to put in a bid on his own, regardless of the fact that he had plenty of money" (in the words of one person). But yeah, it's just weird. MJ fans tend to be really sentimental, especially after his passing, and he adored this things. It's just sad to see it go and see yet another thing change that Michael wouldn't have wanted You're stinky Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.