Ayo 300 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 I dont know if this is the right place to post, but I just found out this video I really wish gaga exclusively uses this technology again, its just so beautiful <3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacify Him 9,073 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 I hope Bjork picks up on this and make a similar thing for her next video.. Spoiler oh wait she already did when will Gaga stop copying? I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayo 300 Posted March 7, 2016 Author Share Posted March 7, 2016 Just now, VenusAsABoy said: I hope Bjork picks up on this and make a similar thing for her next video.. Hide contents oh wait she already did when will Gaga stop copying? but thats computer animation, thats very easy/basic to do ,.. doing it live in a 3d setting is new technology Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 137,875 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 I saw a butterfly! 💚 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 9,317 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 as cool as it is im still mad at the Grammys for their shitty angles and camera blocking. I wont be happy until i see proper shots of that holographic twister Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacify Him 9,073 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, gagaboy94 said: but thats computer animation, thats very easy/basic to do ,.. doing it live in a 3d setting is new technology Idk why you're hoping to see that again but that performance took a lot of preparation. And if you're hoping to see that in the concert, good luck with that. Last Grammys is probably the only ever time she'll do that. Intel might make something else for her if she's teaming up with them again. Anyway, I don't see much else this can be used for again other than for another special event or for recording a music video. So computer animation and *that* would be almost similar. It ain't that special. I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster2015 1,109 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 29 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said: I hope Bjork picks up on this and make a similar thing for her next video.. Hide contents oh wait she already did when will Gaga stop copying? U serious? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark 4,065 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 no1curr. They didn't deliver. 00026 † 10000 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kulture Kiari 3,433 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 27 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said: Idk why you're hoping to see that again but that performance took a lot of preparation. And if you're hoping to see that in the concert, good luck with that. Last Grammys is probably the only ever time she'll do that. Intel might make something else for her if she's teaming up with them again. Anyway, I don't see much else this can be used for again other than for another special event or for recording a music video. So computer animation and *that* would be almost similar. It ain't that special. You clearly have never worked in editing, especially in live editing. You know, animations and all that, when editing in a non live recording, such as a music video, takes a long ass time to render. Ok, now imagine doing it live with the animations not fukcing up is a big step! I for one got excited when seeing it live. If you do not have any appreciation for editing nor live editing, dont go around saying "it is nothing special" when it clearly is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacify Him 9,073 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Just now, Monster2015 said: U serious? A little. 3 minutes ago, RubberHeartt said: You clearly have never worked in editing, especially in live editing. You know, animations and all that, when editing in a non live recording, such as a music video, takes a long ass time to render. Ok, now imagine doing it live with the animations fukcing up is a big step! I for one got excited when seeing it live. If you do not have any appreciating for editing nor live editing, dont go around saying "it is nothing special" when it clearly is. No, hun. I stand by my opinion. And you said it yourself, if it ****s up that much, is it really that special? I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic 1,385 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 It's kinda random. Also if you need to be still and have eyes closed then it's as much fun as projecting that on your ass Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatAsianGuy 2,365 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 46 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said: Idk why you're hoping to see that again but that performance took a lot of preparation. And if you're hoping to see that in the concert, good luck with that. Last Grammys is probably the only ever time she'll do that. Intel might make something else for her if she's teaming up with them again. Anyway, I don't see much else this can be used for again other than for another special event or for recording a music video. So computer animation and *that* would be almost similar. It ain't that special. Wait til Gaga drops the H bomb. Ur entire existence will be slayed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Himeros26 1,688 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 18 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said: A little. No, hun. I stand by my opinion. And you said it yourself, if it ****s up that much, is it really that special? With that logic Bjork needs to try and stop copying every form of animations on a face through cgi. Unless you're trying to say Bjork created this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacify Him 9,073 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Just now, Himeros26 said: With that logic Bjork needs to try and stop copying every form of animations on a face through cgi. Unless you're trying to say Bjork created this Don't tell me you took that little comment way too seriously. You know I didn't mean it like that It's never a race about who did what first. It's about, has it been done yet? I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Himeros26 1,688 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 4 minutes ago, VenusAsABoy said: Don't tell me you took that little comment way too seriously. You know I didn't mean it like that It's never a race about who did what first. It's about, has it been done yet? Okay thank god. At first I took it as sarcasm, then when I saw your second post I got some chest pains. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.