BenG 19,908 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Maybe the Academy wanted it to be disqualified gracefully? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Gale 7,575 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 No, there was no proof that Linda Perry was right, and even in her words Gaga changed the song. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noah 26,972 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 or they just nominated it because Gaga made the Oscars relevant last year ⟡ ⋆ ˚｡⋆🦢⋆ ˚｡⋆⟡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg 6,330 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Why would they? And if they did, they would have had to have publicly disqualified it and withdrawn it from the nominations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noah 26,972 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 1 minute ago, AntiPotCrusader said: No, there was no proof that Linda Perry was right, and even in her words Gaga changed the song. I mean there are 6k People, I think it had some Impact - not like 4k people voting against it, but maybe 100-200. ⟡ ⋆ ˚｡⋆🦢⋆ ˚｡⋆⟡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry 26,836 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 No if it was disqualified they would've just said. It wouldn't have still been in the running. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 'Spectre' is a blockbuster, 'The Hunting Ground' is just a doc film! TIHTY nomination was an achievement! If it was about quality 'Manta Ray' should have won but I think it's all about the commercial thing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinity Wave 7,635 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Could someone explain me why it should have been disqualified? What did Linda Perry say that we have no proof was right? I think I'm missing something Thank You! Colourful Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Gaga 22,931 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 10 minutes ago, Noahhh said: or they just nominated it because Gaga made the Oscars relevant last year I strongly believe this. The nomination itself and the invitation to perform for second year in a row was a way to say "thank you for last year's performance", which save the ceremony of being a total failure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miaa 257 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 8 minutes ago, Infinity Wave said: Could someone explain me why it should have been disqualified? What did Linda Perry say that we have no proof was right? I think I'm missing something Thank You! she said she had heard the song before it was sent to Gaga and there where no changes. Long story short, she didn't think Gaga deserved to be credited as a writer. "How can I protect something so perfect without evil?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloody hooker 6,445 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 8 minutes ago, Infinity Wave said: Could someone explain me why it should have been disqualified? What did Linda Perry say that we have no proof was right? I think I'm missing something Thank You! This mutual gaze was a “longing to touch” or a "pre-coitus" stare. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix 17,395 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 They would announce it. 💎 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinity Wave 7,635 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Miaa said: she said she had heard the song before it was sent to Gaga and there where no changes. Long story short, she didn't think Gaga deserved to be credited as a writer. Just now, Bloody hooker said: Thank you so much Well personally I didn't think gaga could ever make something like that... plus, she is so much "connected" to the song, she always gets so emotional when she sings it, she really relates to it in a very particular way... I strongly believe she did write the song (and I really don't think that in the music industry could happen something like that ) Colourful Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miaa 257 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Infinity Wave said: Thank you so much Well personally I didn't think gaga could ever make something like that... plus, she is so much "connected" to the song, she always gets so emotional when she sings it, she really relates to it in a very particular way... I strongly believe she did write the song (and I really don't think that in the music industry could happen something like that ) But she didn't tho. Diane wrote it, I think that's pretty clear. The fact is we have no way of knowing how much she changed or added to the song, we can only trust that if Diane thought she should be credited than she deserved it. "How can I protect something so perfect without evil?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
420 1,042 Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 2 minutes ago, Infinity Wave said: Thank you so much Well personally I didn't think gaga could ever make something like that... plus, she is so much "connected" to the song, she always gets so emotional when she sings it, she really relates to it in a very particular way... I strongly believe she did write the song (and I really don't think that in the music industry could happen something like that ) Well, I've said this in another thread before. But Diane said that Gaga completely changed the mood of the song from being very sad to being triumphant like a survivor. I think the first version had leaked before and I'd listened to it and it sounded really sad like she didn't wanna do anything anymore like Diane said. 너와의 어색한 침묵이 차라리 좋아 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.