Jump to content
news

Gaga RTs "Kesha is being treated like a human jukebox in a cage"


lego

Featured Posts

Right after dr Puke's twitter meltdown. :emma: 

So she doesn't care he mentioned her.

 

 

EVERYONE SHOULD READ THIS ARTICLE.

Thank you Gaga. 

 

 

 

 

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
DiscoHeaven23

Girl Power! 

The two top female singers of 2010 unite!!

 

Edit: WOAH, the top overall female artists of 2010 according to Billboard (includes, singles, albums and tours) were:

1. Lady Gaga

2. Taylor Swift

3. Kesha

 

Top Singles Artists:

1. Kesha

2. Gaga

SISTERS OF 2010 UNITEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Kesha’s testimony, she says the producer told her that “if I ever tried to get away from him for any reason, he would tie me up in litigation until my career was over.”

There’s more to it than that. There are many, many more details than that, and many more examples – both explicit and insidious - of the alleged abuse. But that’s probably enough for anyone to understand why Kesha begged Sony – who own Dr. Luke’s label, Kemosabe Records – to allow her to record under any one of their other labels. Any label not associated with the man who she says raped her. “I know I cannot work with Dr. Luke,” she said. “I physically cannot. I don't feel safe in any way.” Sony refused. So too, as of Friday, did a New York Supreme Court. And so Kesha – according to a judge ruling – should go back to the studio, and make four more albums under Dr. Luke’s label.

What on earth, then, are Sony expecting these albums to sound like? Do they truly believe creativity can be forced out of an artist whom they have effectively held hostage? Is the upholding of ironclad contracts more important to them than the emotional wellbeing of their artist? “My instinct,” said the judge at Kesha’s hearing, “is to do the commercially reasonable thing.” It seems Sony’s instinct is the same. To them, Kesha is a human jukebox, one whose suffering is just an inconvenience to their business.

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

BuzzcutSeason

She honestly is the only one seeing that aspect.

Love and support is good but has anyone ever thought what Kesha's doing or thinking right now?

Twitter is mainly building her defense but she's being toyed around with :green:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2016 at 2:12 AM, Creyk said:

Go back to working on LG5 Gaga

 

 

 

 

Don't tell an adult woman what to do.

Irony in your comment under article about artist being treated like a human jukebox.

 

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Illuminati
7 minutes ago, VampireHeart said:

In Kesha’s testimony, she says the producer told her that “if I ever tried to get away from him for any reason, he would tie me up in litigation until my career was over.”

There’s more to it than that. There are many, many more details than that, and many more examples – both explicit and insidious - of the alleged abuse. But that’s probably enough for anyone to understand why Kesha begged Sony – who own Dr. Luke’s label, Kemosabe Records – to allow her to record under any one of their other labels. Any label not associated with the man who she says raped her. “I know I cannot work with Dr. Luke,” she said. “I physically cannot. I don't feel safe in any way.” Sony refused. So too, as of Friday, did a New York Supreme Court. And so Kesha – according to a judge ruling – should go back to the studio, and make four more albums under Dr. Luke’s label.

What on earth, then, are Sony expecting these albums to sound like? Do they truly believe creativity can be forced out of an artist whom they have effectively held hostage? Is the upholding of ironclad contracts more important to them than the emotional wellbeing of their artist? “My instinct,” said the judge at Kesha’s hearing, “is to do the commercially reasonable thing.” It seems Sony’s instinct is the same. To them, Kesha is a human jukebox, one whose suffering is just an inconvenience to their business.

Actually apparently she can switch to work with others under sony with Luke not being involved in any way it's just that sony supposedly wouldn't promote it and so she's forced to work with a label that is somewhat on Luke's side and also doomed to flop with her new material 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwontell

Well, she's putting her ass in the line by doing so...
It's good that she's putting her money where her mouth is (I mean, she doesn't raise the feminist flag as high as other people, but still...), but it's also worrying that's she's doing that when she's close to putting a new album out...

ATTENTION: (bad) jokes and sarcasm are still a thing, so don't take everything I say literally. Thank you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BlTCH said:

Actually apparently she can switch to work with others under sony with Luke not being involved in any way it's just that sony supposedly wouldn't promote it and so she's forced to work with a label that is somewhat on Luke's side and also doomed to flop with her new material 

 

No, she can RECORD with other producer STILL under Luke's label, they have no obligation to release her material or promote it.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kemosabe_Records

He owns her.

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the same company who, just a few months ago, entered into alabel joint venture with Cee Lo Green – a man who defended himself against accusations of rape by saying that it isn’t rape if the victim is unconscious.

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Paper Gangsta
4 minutes ago, BlTCH said:

Actually apparently she can switch to work with others under sony with Luke not being involved in any way it's just that sony supposedly wouldn't promote it and so she's forced to work with a label that is somewhat on Luke's side and also doomed to flop with her new material 

She can work with others but they won't let her release it.

It allready happened:

In July 2013, The Flaming Lips announced that they hoped to release a full-length collaborative album with Kesha, called Lipsha, although it was eventually cancelled in the winter of the same year. Kesha sent a message to a fan expressing how it was out of her control and that she wanted to release the material, even for free, saying that she didn't care about the money.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the big questions in all this, of course, is how other artists have managed to wriggle free from their contracts with relative ease. How did, say, Zayn Malik manage to release himself from his One Direction contract because he wanted “to be able to relax,” while Kesha remains tangled up with her alleged abuser? Some have been quick to point out that, technically, Malik is still under Sony – he’s just transferred to another of their labels. But isn’t that exactly what Kesha’s trying to do? Let’s revisit the opening sentence of her injuction: “Kesha Rose Sebert wants nothing more than to be able to record an album. Her only condition is that she be allowed to record with a record label that is not affiliated with someone who has emotionally and sexually abused her.”

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Paper Gangsta
3 minutes ago, Iwontell said:

Well, she's putting her ass in the line by doing so...
It's good that she's putting her money where her mouth is (I mean, she doesn't raise the feminist flag as high as other people, but still...), but it's also worrying that's she's doing that when she's close to putting a new album out...

so her career should be more important than her humanity and morals?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwontell
2 minutes ago, Paper Gangsta said:

so her career should be more important than her humanity and morals?

Not what I said at all...

ATTENTION: (bad) jokes and sarcasm are still a thing, so don't take everything I say literally. Thank you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...