Himeros26 1,688 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 54 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: When the media reports it it's not biased or there for ratings. The thing is it WASN'T "reported" by the media. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 2 minutes ago, Himeros26 said: The thing is it WASN'T "reported" by the media. But you just said it was on TV. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 6 hours ago, LebaneseDude said: She won and that's not debatable. It was by a strand though in terms of voters, but not in terms of delegates. As of today, 29 delegates Clinton to 21 to Sanders. 2 are uncommitted but ultimately irrelevant. In politics "virtual ties" don't exist. It's funny how just because it's Clinton who won that people are calling this a "tie". I'm fairly certain if Sanders won the Berniebots would be calling it a crushing victory. It's so expected that Sanders wouldn't concede. He has no class. Considering Iowa was supposedly more friendly to Sanders, and he needed to win it while Clinton didn't, this is actually a big loss for Sanders. Exactly that is his aim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 8,840 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 Let the "inevitable candidate" enjoy that .3 lead Lol The unfortunate truth is that this tie hurts him more than it hurts her. She is obviously the Democratic establishment's choice for the nomination and that won't change unless Bernie begins to beat her with overwhelming numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 11 minutes ago, Simon said: Exactly that is his aim. Dunno if you don't understand the meaning of "class" in this context, but it refers to etiquette not societal standing. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 5 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Dunno if you don't understand the meaning of "class" in this context, but it refers to etiquette not societal standing. I know, i tried to be funny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 13 minutes ago, Simon said: I know, i tried to be funny 28 minutes ago, Rising said: Let the "inevitable candidate" enjoy that .3 lead Lol The unfortunate truth is that this tie hurts him more than it hurts her. She is obviously the Democratic establishment's choice for the nomination and that won't change unless Bernie begins to beat her with overwhelming numbers. Iowa is a white-majority liberal state where its denizens lean socialist. Theoretically they should be leaning towards Bernie. Furthermore, caucuses attract activists and the more zealous followers of a candidate. Once again that goes in favor of Bernie. While different polls said different things, many assumed that Bernie was going to win Iowa and New Hampshire. While the latter is most likely to going to happen, that the former didn't is a huge blow to Sanders. He hasn't even conceded. Hilary didn't even need Iowa. You're right though. Hillary is the more natural choice and her performance is just cementing it. Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 8,840 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 8 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said: Iowa is a white-majority liberal state where its denizens lean socialist. Theoretically they should be leaning towards Bernie. Furthermore, caucuses attract activists and the more zealous followers of a candidate. Once again that goes in favor of Bernie. While different polls said different things, many assumed that Bernie was going to win Iowa and New Hampshire. While the latter is most likely to going to happen, that the former didn't is a huge blow to Sanders. He hasn't even conceded. Hilary didn't even need Iowa. You're right though. Hillary is the more natural choice and her performance is just cementing it. Ok, thank you for the editorial, Hillarybot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Himeros26 1,688 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 1 hour ago, LebaneseDude said: But you just said it was on TV. It wasn't a report by the news or "HILARY CHEATING!" As you implied... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted February 2, 2016 Author Share Posted February 2, 2016 38 minutes ago, Rising said: Let the "inevitable candidate" enjoy that .3 lead Lol The unfortunate truth is that this tie hurts him more than it hurts her. She is obviously the Democratic establishment's choice for the nomination and that won't change unless Bernie begins to beat her with overwhelming numbers. True. It's more than I personally expected though. I expected Hilary to win by a larger margin. In a sense it changed their image. Bernie's less enthusiastic supporters in other states might feel like he "actually has a chance" and will be more motivated to vote. Hilary doesn't look as strong as she is made out to be with so much "establishment" support. But in reality Hilary is still the obvious choice for the Democrats. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayla 7,595 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 7 hours ago, LebaneseDude said: I've decided to post this link every time I see a post like this: http://thedailybanter.com/2016/01/hillary-gop-smears/ I agree with what the article says, and I do think Hillary is unfairly criticized at times. However. The video posted had words directly spoken by Hillary that are contradictory. The video posted wasn't talking about Hillary's treatment by the GOP, it was showing how she has flip-flopped on important issues. And there have been other shady things; edited videos showing more applause when Hillary speaks, done by TV companies who are big donors to her, for example. (Which, that I wouldn't put on Hillary - it's very possible, and more likely, that those companies made those choices on their own without her telling them to) But the point is she does have big corporations backing her, and we need to move out of a society where big corporations get to make decisions that affect the population. And Bernie acting without class? How someone speaks and their character can be two different things. Hillary speaks with more class- I wish Bernie had the ability to give a speech like she does- she sweeps the floor with him when it comes to public speaking- but she also doesn't stay true to her word. Hillary says she won't attack her fellow candidates, but then puts out attack ads when they start proving to be a threat. That's not class, no matter how wonderfully she speaks when she criticizes people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 1 hour ago, Himeros26 said: The thing is it WASN'T "reported" by the media. Because there is nothing to report. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LebaneseDude 6,146 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 53 minutes ago, Rising said: Ok, thank you for the editorial, Hillarybot The correct term is Hillbot Edited just now by LebaneseDude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socotra 3,357 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 50 minutes ago, Kayla said: I agree with what the article says, and I do think Hillary is unfairly criticized at times. However. The video posted had words directly spoken by Hillary that are contradictory. The video posted wasn't talking about Hillary's treatment by the GOP, it was showing how she has flip-flopped on important issues. And there have been other shady things; edited videos showing more applause when Hillary speaks, done by TV companies who are big donors to her, for example. (Which, that I wouldn't put on Hillary - it's very possible, and more likely, that those companies made those choices on their own without her telling them to) But the point is she does have big corporations backing her, and we need to move out of a society where big corporations get to make decisions that affect the population. And Bernie acting without class? How someone speaks and their character can be two different things. Hillary speaks with more class- I wish Bernie had the ability to give a speech like she does- she sweeps the floor with him when it comes to public speaking- but she also doesn't stay true to her word. Hillary says she won't attack her fellow candidates, but then puts out attack ads when they start proving to be a threat. That's not class, no matter how wonderfully she speaks when she criticizes people. On the class issue, I think Hillary comes off as such because she is very rehearsed, scripted. I forget where I read it, but Bernie has hardly prepared before the debates – completely forgoing it in the first – and it shows. tbh though I kinda like that. I wish our politicians didn't have to be so scripted for fear of saying the wrong thing. I think they need to say what they think, and Bernie consistently does that (even if it's not classy, per se). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopBitch 1,218 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 The three top Republican candidates, Cruz, Trump and Rubio, are frightening when thinking of one of them as POTUS. It makes me sick to my stomach. Hillary all the way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.