Azealia Banks to Vote Trump

[Haroon 49,685]

I don't know much about politics but she's totally in her right to vote for whoever, I doubt there's often a time when 100% of the things a candidate stands for is what you want (or that there isn't a candidate that pushes for another interest of yours more than the aforementioned candidate), it comes down to weighing the different parts and seeing what works best for your beliefs/opinions/etc I guess - I hope this post makes sense  

[AlexanderLevi2 5,849]

13 minutes ago, SISTERV said:

When has Donald Trump ever said he hates blacks? Misleading as hell. 

Y'all need to start backing up your opinions. The few republicans on this site don't label Hillary or Bernie diragatory names. Why do all the Trump haters just post comments saying he is disgusting or racist or bigoted when he has employed more blacks, Latinos, women, people in general than any other candidate?

Back it up. With receipts. And not super politicized rhetoric about him wanting to temporarily stop foreign Muslims from entering the country. (That's constitutionally legal under Article 8 "The President must protect the rights of every citizen nor creed of wealth, circumstance, race, doctrine, or individual liberty, But may at times disallow the entry of any foreign groups or their persons thereof, under any judgement of circumstances that is a threat, to ensure temporary protection and the securities of the People's safety, business, and welfare.")

In other words: the President can't deny minorities that are already citizens their rights, but at any time he can deny the entry of foreigners for whatever reason he deems a possible threat to people, the economy, or rights. He could legally say all Lady Gaga fans from Russia can't come into the United States for six months because they are stealing seats from the LG5 Ball and it would be constitutionally sound. 

 

http://www.bet.com/news/national/2015/12/11/donald-trump-and-the-blacks.html

[Noir 17,531]

she is honestly the worst

[Kayla 7,595]

Basically her stream of tweets can be translated to say "America is ****ed up and if we want to keep it that way we need someone just as crazy as our President," which is the weirdest endorsement I've ever seen. 

 

[Kayla 7,595]

55 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Maybe he can get her to come perform at his speeches and rallies! Get those sales from those white conservative males. Lol 

At least then Trump would have a decent music act. She'd be the exact opposite of those little girls he brought up on stage.  

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

1 hour ago, Pizza said:

While I don't agree with many things Trump says, I'm also not against people who plan on voting for him. 

This passive way of thinking doesn't work in politics, especially when their choices affect you.

I wonder when millennials will pick up on that. 

Note that I'm not saying you should hate his supporters, but to be neutral about this particular issue with them is just wrong.  

In politics, when it comes to voting, they are your enemies. Nothing more, nothing less.

[SISTERV 3,887]

2 minutes ago, AlexanderLevi2 said:

http://www.bet.com/news/national/2015/12/11/donald-trump-and-the-blacks.html

How is saying "I would love to be an educated black man" racist??? 

I love how even a positive comment gets turned into being racist, but two black guys made a movie called White Chicks where they stereotyped white females and it's "not racist". 

I also love how this article completely made up a quote to make you think Trump said black people are lazy...and put it in quotations as if it's real...leading the reader to think it is an actual quote, when it's an inference from the writers obviously unobjective perspective. So much for journalism. 

I wonder how many quotes some of you believe are real because it's on the internet or an entertainment website that is the equivalent of OK Magazine?

Kind of reminds me of that meme that went around misquoting Trump as saying he "would run as a republican because they are the dumbest people" in 1996 when that was later found to be a totally made up lie that used a picture from 1987.

Folks.....BET is not "a source". 

[SISTERV 3,887]

5 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

This passive way of thinking doesn't work in politics, especially when their choices affect you.

I wonder when millennials will pick up on that. 

So you should be against someone because their opinion doesn't line up with your progressive ideals?

That reminds me of a certain thinker....I think he wrote a book called "Mein Kampf". 

[AlexanderLevi2 5,849]

1 hour ago, SISTERV said:

How is saying "I would love to be an educated black man" racist??? 

I love how even a positive comment gets turned into being racist, but two black guys made a movie called White Chicks where they stereotyped white females and it's "not racist". 

I also love how this article completely made up a quote to make you think Trump said black people are lazy...and put it in quotations as if it's real...leading the reader to think it is an actual quote, when it's an inference from the writers obviously unobjective perspective. So much for journalism. 

I wonder how many quotes some of you believe are real because it's on the internet or an entertainment website that is the equivalent of OK Magazine?

Kind of reminds me of that meme that went around misquoting Trump as saying he "would run as a republican because they are the dumbest people" in 1996 when that was later found to be a totally made up lie that used a picture from 1987.

Folks.....BET is not "a source". 

You only picked out part of the quote and took it out of context. Saying that educated black men have it easier than him... Cause he's white. When, systematically, this is completely incorrect.

How was white chicks even brought up in this conversation? That was literally pulled out of your ass.

He may not be I HATE THOSE BLACK PEOPLE THEY ARE THE WORST HUMANS EVER. But his white privelage easily shines through his speech and rhetoric. @SISTERV (do you want to re read those two sentences, plz ?)

He is not one to be progressive for social rights in any sense. And if you think he will continue the small progression we have made... I'm scared.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

Just now, SISTERV said:

So you are "passive" by not being against someone because their opinion doesn't line up with your progressive ideals?

That reminds me of a certain thinker....I think he wrote a book called "Mein Kampf". 

You should be active in that you should try to change their opinion or at least give them different points of view.

Why are you going to the far extreme of violence? Typical.

[Alien Tulip 12,428]

6 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

This passive way of thinking doesn't work in politics, especially when their choices affect you.

I wonder when millennials will pick up on that. 

Note that I'm not saying you should hate his supporters, but to be neutral about this particular issue with them is just wrong.  

In politics, when it comes to voting, they are your enemies. Nothing more, nothing less.

I understand your point but I'm not the type of human being that will even be effected with a 90 foot monster attacking my town. I will learn to survive. 

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

2 minutes ago, Pizza said:

I understand your point but I'm not the type of human being that will even be effected with a 90 foot monster attacking my town. I will learn to survive. 

That's always a good mindset.

[The Child 18,997]

35 minutes ago, SISTERV said:

When has Donald Trump ever said he hates blacks? Misleading as hell. 

Y'all need to start backing up your opinions. The few republicans on this site don't label Hillary or Bernie diragatory names. Why do all the Trump haters just post comments saying he is disgusting or racist or bigoted when he has employed more blacks, Latinos, women, people in general than any other candidate?

Back it up. With receipts. And not super politicized rhetoric about him wanting to temporarily stop foreign Muslims from entering the country. (That's constitutionally legal under Article 8 "The President must protect the rights of every citizen nor creed of wealth, circumstance, race, doctrine, or individual liberty, But may at times disallow the entry of any foreign groups or their persons thereof, under any judgement of circumstances that is a threat, to ensure temporary protection and the securities of the People's safety, business, and welfare.")

In other words: the President can't deny minorities that are already citizens their rights, but at any time he can deny the entry of foreigners for whatever reason he deems a possible threat to people, the economy, or rights. He could legally say all Lady Gaga fans from Russia can't come into the United States for six months because they are stealing seats from the LG5 Ball and it would be constitutionally sound. 

 

Okay cool you wasted time to write this rant, do you feel better?

[SISTERV 3,887]

2 minutes ago, AlexanderLevi2 said:

You only picked out part of the quote and took it out of context. Saying that educated black men have it easier than him... Cause he's white when systematically this is completely wrong.

How was white chicks even brought up in this conversation? That was literally pulled out of your ass.

He may not be I HATE THOSE BLACK PEOPLE THEY ARE THE WORST HUMANS EVER. But his white privelage easily shines through his speech and rhetoric.

He is not one to be progressive for social rights in any sense. And if you think he will continue the small progression we have made... I'm scared.

First of all...you shouldn't "hate anyone".

Second of all....that isn't what he was saying. He was talking about himself and how he would use any circumstance he was handed to succeed. He wasn't disregarding black people who have it hard, he was thinking like a business person does...which is to seize all opportunity. He was saying that because of his inherent attitude he would find a way to as a black person to advantage himself. Just like most successful black people have...Jay Z, P Diddy, Tyler Perry use their race as a plus....not a detriment to their success.

That's the problem with this generation. They don't really understand doing or being a do-er. They are mostly talk. 

You don't hear many successful black people coming out and joining Black Lives Matter because they characteristically don't identify with it. They didn't complain or try and argue about semantics about being black because they moved on to be something more than just their race. 

Alot of people that call themselves progressives hold insanely high standards for everyone else but aren't particularly successful when they begin to victimize themselves. 

It happens to be one of the biggest reasons Lady Gaga started to lose popularity. The minute she started to talk about her hip breaking, that she was mistreated, that people needed to "understand her", her interest level dropped and her album sales hit an all time low. Her album sales were high when she wanted to show strength and be a fighter despite being a "weird girl from NYC." People relate to that and admire that. That's why she has come back again...after ARTPOP she decided to be a fighter again and not accept loss. 

It's really all connected, and if you pay attention to who is successful...it's never the endless talkers...it's the doers. Especially the ones who don't let their race, sexual orientation, economic situation, personal life destroy them.

[SISTERV 3,887]

16 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

You should be active in that you should try to change their opinion or at least give them different points of view.

Why are you going to the far extreme of violence? Typical.

Because you said you should be "against the person" and not "be against their opinion".