Jump to content
other

Linda made Gaga trend on Twitter... oh no


StarstruckIllusion

Featured Posts

lucastecala
41 minutes ago, ROARyals said:

This benefits no one.

as more and more sites are posting it, and since everyone in the Internet is a pressedamist, this is only giving Gaga bad press. This is probably making the people who thought she changed, go back even stronger into her dislike for her. This is damaging to the image she was building up the last year :(

Linda really didn't have to spark ****, but I wish we didn't run and get her kindle wood to start a fire with. Basically kms and I'm starting to see how this fanbase is keeping Gags down. 

How are we gonna chill everyone out before I hear this **** on TV? :toofunny:

EDIT: Linda is trending now too, y'all can stop cupcaking now. 

 

chill out honey it's not the end of the world. Two days from now nobody will be talking about it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
KURUSHITOVSKA

If it wasn't for Gaga the song would never had the attention it has, so it's good for both. Linda Perry is only pressed that she didn't get nominated. And Gaga was raped, if she accepted that project is because she feels it for real. Diana has been nominated several times before, if this helps her to get the oscar, then I would be happy and forget that Gaga has won it too. And of course I want Gaga to win an Oscar, just because I want her work to be finally recongized. The song was written years before, it's not that it was written specially for Gaga. She can write her own songs, they gave Gaga the project because they knew it was the only chance to give the song an oppprtunity.

¿Qué currículum tiene ésta tarántula?
Link to post
Share on other sites

andy232000
27 minutes ago, Bloody Matt said:

Exactly. That's why I think people are exagerating a bit. :happy:

also, aren´t the winners picked months prior to the ceremony...it read it takes 15 hours to make one grammy trophy, so imagine what it takes to make 200 + oscar awards, they have to prepare in advance. they probably have the winners already before the nominations came out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, andy232000 said:

also, aren´t the winners picked months prior to the ceremony...it read it takes 15 hours to make one grammy trophy, so imagine what it takes to make 200 + oscar awards, they have to prepare in advance. they probably have the winners already before the nominations came out

Sis, that is not how it works....they get a blank trophy at the awards ceremony to pose with, they send the actual grammy/oscar weeks later through the post, after it's done.

If it was decided that far in advance and they manufactured them like that, the list of winners would always leak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is tihty you won't know till it happens to you  it is about how it feels when it happens to you which you won't know till it happens to you. It is not song called hole in your sole so I guess one line can change the whole song same words different meaning atleast if it is true that gaga only changed one line but I think it is hers as well it has gaga written all over it she wouldn't sing it if it wasn't hers and there are other co-writers I would say those who helped inspire them to write it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

andy232000
6 minutes ago, Creyk said:

Sis, that is not how it works....they get a blank trophy at the awards ceremony to pose with, they send the actual grammy/oscar weeks later through the post, after it's done.

If it was decided that far in advance and they manufactured them like that, the list of winners would always leak.

they dont give black trophies, they give them with the won category. but they still have to know how many to get manufactured. its not like they ask for 500 of the bat. unless they re-use the remaing trophies for the next award season, and the list would not leak cause its the accounting firm gathering the results. not an open group 

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Didymus said:

Just search "Lady Gaga Linda" on Google :rip:

 

56 minutes ago, Metamorphosis said:

That's not true. Several blogs and media outlets are reporting on it.

oh haha sorry i only checked google this morning. still think this is all a bit Much though like isn't she partly trending for the oscars, golden globes and stuff. bad publicity isn't the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

REALITY

This is like your second or third thread on the same topic, please stop. 

𝔊𝔬𝔬𝔡𝔟𝔶𝔢, ℑ'𝔩𝔩 𝔰𝔢𝔢 𝔶𝔬𝔲 𝔦𝔫 𝔪𝔶 𝔡𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔪𝔰
Link to post
Share on other sites

andy232000

90% of the tweets are calling Linda out for her "stupid attempt at being shady" while the others are just news articles

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jonathanholland

This fanbase is way to scared of bad publicity because we got a lot of it because of ARTPOP. This is the business Guys, this is how it works. The day we don't hear bad publicity anymore we should be worried, untill then we better get used to it. It needs a lot more to destroy Gaga's image, she has been building up last year. Maybe it will spoil her chance to win the oscar, But she has been nominated, which is great already.

 

Before there was love, there was silence
Link to post
Share on other sites

SlaeUrAnus

The media just could not wait for her to ****ing slip up/get some dirt dished couldn't they!?

In my messy era.
Link to post
Share on other sites

MaryJaneHolland
2 hours ago, andy232000 said:

no, its better to stay quiet. if diane or gaga respond the media will fire again. they need to ignore her and let it die on its own

we are thirsty for some drama, baby :stalkga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...