Pacify Him 9,073 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 I guess I don't have to stay up longer just to watch the show I’m getting on your nerves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 NEWS We don't have news when she's losing. FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,023 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 20 minutes ago, LePetitMonstr said: You have to be there to win. I actually agree with you that for some reason nominees who attend the ceremony stand a higher chance at winning but seriously though, are they just going to alter the results and give the award to whoever that attends? I know none of us here are insiders but does anyone have knowledge in this thing? Do people ACTUALLY do that? I mean are we joking or is this how they REALLY practise in the award show industry? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Evans 8,917 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, AmericanHSlave said: I actually agree with you that for some reason nominees who attend the ceremony stand a higher chance at winning but seriously though, are they just going to alter the results and give the award to whoever that attends? I know none of us here are insiders but does anyone have knowledge in this thing? Do people ACTUALLY do that? I mean are we joking or is this how they REALLY practise in the award show industry? I've read this is how it works at the PCA's and Ed Sheeran has said they gave him a Brit Award bc Adele didn't show up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LePetitGAGABLover 21,234 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 4 minutes ago, AmericanHSlave said: I actually agree with you that for some reason nominees who attend the ceremony stand a higher chance at winning but seriously though, are they just going to alter the results and give the award to whoever that attends? I know none of us here are insiders but does anyone have knowledge in this thing? Do people ACTUALLY do that? I mean are we joking or are we being serious about this? Well. Maybe. I feel there is something fishy. I'm sorry, but there is no way she could of won. And no, I'm not salty that Gaga lost. It's just really suspicious imo. Gaga has like 10x more fans than who ever she is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeoFameMonster 1,592 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 That award show has always snubbed her just like the AMA's. But clearly they got it wrong since Gaga lost to "Who" and Game Of thrones lost to Outlander....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Gibson 3,489 Posted January 7, 2016 Author Share Posted January 7, 2016 3 minutes ago, AmericanHSlave said: I actually agree with you that for some reason nominees who attend the ceremony stand a higher chance at winning but seriously though, are they just going to alter the results and give the award to whoever that attends? I know none of us here are insiders but does anyone have knowledge in this thing? Do people ACTUALLY do that? I mean are we joking or is this how they REALLY practise in the award show industry? I believe the thing is that they invite only the winners, because they just can't change the results since their name is in the trophy. And the voting were closed long a go so they had to make trophies with the names and invites these ones. Also, it would explain why Gaga didn't go since she's doing nothing tonight, didn't post anything on social media and she's being with Taylor everywhere lately. Besides he didn't say a reason why she didn't go during the speech. Anyway let's hope for the Globes BTW, it was rude me saying WTF at the winner, it's just I didn't know her Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 109,304 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 LMAO irrelevant awards anyway since day one. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢, 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯'𝘵 (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan 2,051 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 the what awards sis? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,023 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 19 minutes ago, stfugaga said: I've read this is how it works at the PCA's and Ed Sheeran has said they gave him a Brit Award bc Adele didn't show up How unfair. 19 minutes ago, LePetitMonstr said: Well. Maybe. I feel there is something fishy. I'm sorry, but there is no way she could of won. And no, I'm not salty that Gaga lost. It's just really suspicious imo. Gaga has like 10x more fans than who ever she is I agree. This is suspicious as fck. 16 minutes ago, James Gibson said: I believe the thing is that they invite only the winners, because they just can't change the results since their name is in the trophy. And the voting were closed long a go so they had to make trophies with the names and invites these ones. Also, it would explain why Gaga didn't go since she's doing nothing tonight, didn't post anything on social media and she's being with Taylor everywhere lately. Besides he didn't say a reason why she didn't go during the speech. Anyway let's hope for the Globes BTW, it was rude me saying WTF at the winner, it's just I didn't know her Actually you weren't the only one who said WTF at the winner. I'm glad it's only the PCA though, at least it's not the Golden Globe. This just proves how important it is for her to attend the Golden Globe ceremony. I thought she would attend the PCA since Taylor was confirmed as an attendee. I think it would have been less suspicious if they gave the award to Emilia Clarke who stars in Game of Thrones instead but let me guess, Emilia didn't attend the show either so they decided to give it to someone else instead. PCA is a mess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJPOP 81 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 I don't take the PCA's seriously. The majority (or every single) of the awards are rigged anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagata 695 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronk 14,762 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 1 hour ago, LePetitMonstr said: Well. Maybe. I feel there is something fishy. I'm sorry, but there is no way she could of won. And no, I'm not salty that Gaga lost. It's just really suspicious imo. Gaga has like 10x more fans than who ever she is I'm suspicious also. Consider this: Twitter followers; LG 54.1 million, CB 139 thousand Facebook likes; LG 61.5 Million, CB 8805. Instagram followers; LG 13.6 million, CB 114 thousand. Gaga has more than 100x more fans than Caitriona Balfe. If PCA goes only by votes, are they independently audited? I'm not making an accusation, I just would like to see receipts to clear things up. I live outside the space time continuum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sister 9,907 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 And the whole world repeats "Who is She"??!!! hah~ The future's uncertain and the end is always near. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,023 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 27 minutes ago, Ronk said: I'm suspicious also. Consider this: Twitter followers; LG 54.1 million, CB 139 thousand Facebook likes; LG 61.5 Million, CB 8805. Instagram followers; LG 13.6 million, CB 114 thousand. Gaga has more than 100x more fans than Caitriona Balfe. If PCA goes only by votes, are they independently audited? I'm not making an accusation, I just would like to see receipts to clear things up. Not to mention Katy Perry who has way more followers and FB likes than Gaga always loses poll competition to Gaga. I'm not saying polls matter, but if Katy Perry doesn't even have these loyal fans, how does CB have it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.