Bebe 17,289 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 I know we can all joke about them being 'mentally ill' as the media treats white terrorists, but surely the media cannot call this anything else but terrorism. I mean the first definition Google gives for terrorism: "the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims." I mean they have taken over a federal building and are threatening violence if their terms are not met. Plus there is a group of them, it can hardly be dismissed as a "mentally ill, lone wolf" type thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo Rose 1,475 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 6 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: They are armed citizens taking over a government building. If they were Arab/"Muslim looking" you well know they'd be all over the news as possible ISIS sympathizers. Of course if they appear to be foreigners the reaction is different. Islam is foreign to the US whether you like it or not. There was no Islamic presence here at all before the late 1900s Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 8 minutes ago, Bebe said: I know we can all joke about them being 'mentally ill' as the media treats white terrorists, but surely the media cannot call this anything else but terrorism. I mean the first definition Google gives for terrorism: "the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims." I mean they have taken over a federal building and are threatening violence if their terms are not met. Watching CNN right now. Their headline is: "Armed protesters occupying federal land" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Tokyo Rose said: Of course if they appear to be foreigners the reaction is different. Islam is foreign to the US whether you like it or not. There was no Islamic presence here at all before the late 1900s "Different" aka hysteria. Let's not even go as far as Muslims. If these were Black Lives Matter protesters they'd be run down by police for taking over a government building. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted January 3, 2016 Author Share Posted January 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: Watching CNN right now. They're headline is: "Armed protesters occupying federal land" Look at these headlines FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katharine Hepburn 4,607 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Let 'em burn xoxo Joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bebe 17,289 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 6 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: Watching CNN right now. They're headline is: "Armed protesters occupying federal land" Ludicrous. Well I'm sure they are at least crying out about how violent this protest is, how these protesters have no respect for their community and are calling for white leaders to stand up and take accountability for this dangerous gang of thugs *eye roll* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Also, why are they armed? Were posters not enough to express their disagreement? Perhaps contacting major news outlets so they could cover their story? Why do yo need the guns? Is there a possibility that you will use them? And against whom? The judge? The police? Or is it just to feed your pathetic "patriotic" ego? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,683 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 CNN anchor just said the protesters have said "They are prepared to use violence if they feel they are attacked first" So peaceful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted January 3, 2016 Author Share Posted January 3, 2016 4 minutes ago, Tokyo Rose said: Of course if they appear to be foreigners the reaction is different. Islam is foreign to the US whether you like it or not. There was no Islamic presence here at all before the late 1900s Are you saying that generations of muslims born and raised in America are foreigners? Also you are wrong about second part. "One of the earliest accounts of Islam's presence in North America dates to 1528, when a Moroccan slave, called Estevanico by his Spanish masters, was shipwrecked near present-day Galveston, Texas.[15] He and four survivors subsequently traveled through much of the American southwest and the Mexican interior before reaching Mexico City. "Muslims' presence [in the United States] is affirmed in documents dated more than a century before religious liberty became the law of the land, as in a Virginia statute of 1682 which referred to 'negroes, moores, molatoes, and others, born of and in heathenish, idollatrous, pagan, and Mahometan parentage and country' who 'heretofore and hereafter may be purchased, procured, or otherwise obteigned, as slaves.'"[16] One of the first documented Muslims in North America wasAnthony Janszoon van Salee, a landholder and merchant of mixed Dutch-Moor descent who settled in New Netherlands (modern New York) in the 17th century.[17][18] An early Egyptian immigrant is mentioned in the accounts of the Dutch settlers of theCatskill Mountains and recorded in the 1884History of Greene County, New York. According to this tradition, an Egyptian named "Norsereddin" settled in the Catskills in the vicinity of the Catskill Mountain House. He befriended the local indigenous American chief, Shandaken, and sought the hand of his daughter Lotowana in marriage. Rejected, he poisoned Lotowana and in consequence was caught and burned alive.[19][20]" ... "Some of the slaves brought to colonial America from Africa were Muslims, whose ancestors were converted to Islam by Arab invaders when they conquered most of North Africa.[5][9] By 1800, some 500,000 Africans arrived in what became the United States. Historians estimate that between 15 to 30 percent of all enslaved African men, and less than 15 percent of the enslaved African women, were Muslims. These enslaved Muslims stood out from their compatriots because of their "resistance, determination and education".[39] It is estimated that over 50% of the slaves imported to North America came from areas where Islam was followed by at least a minority population. Thus, no less than 200,000 came from regions influenced by Islam. Substantial numbers originated fromSenegambia, a region with an established community of Muslim inhabitants extending to the 11th century.[40]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zilla 13,451 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Hmmmmm it's barely on CNN even. People are crazy 𝙸'𝚖 𝚊 𝚓𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brizoda 4,177 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 what a country where a group of fascistoids can do almost whatever they want Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tokyo Rose 1,475 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 1 minute ago, SubRosa said: Are you saying that generations of muslims born and raised in America are foreigners? Also you are wrong about second part. How did I know someone would copy and paste wikipedia to "prove me wrong". Islam is foreign to the US, as is Arab immigration. Yes there are anecdotal instances of people from the Middle East coming here, that doesn't change the facts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmm 879 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 These are not terrorists specially that they did not commit any terrorist acts and they are simply asking for their rights! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayla 7,595 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 What's interesting is what they're doing with their guns is exactly what many pro-gun people support; using them to protect yourself against the government, forming a citizen's militia to stand up against an (allegedly) unfair government. The criticisms raised in this thread are totally legitimate- if this were a group of muslims, mexicans, or black people doing the exact same thing, they would be met with force and people judging their entire race. But this will not be used to represent white people, they will not be used to inspire fear, and people will continue to ignore the fact that majority of terrorist attacks that have occurred on US soil have been white, christian, right-wing men. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.