Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
society

Breaking: San Bernardino shooters did not support jihad on social media


lego

Featured Posts

2 minutes ago, Whispering said:

They were the murderers.

Come on, people....  Don't believe some idiots on Twitter. 

Why are you insulting these people you disagree with?

You are telling us to blindly believe in the media, who just NOW decided to correct previous information about "facebook pledge to ISIS". 

Even if they were the killers, what was their motive? If it wasn't terrorism, it was perfectly timed for the Trump's muslim ban and the rest of the republicans' fear mongering. 

It really does not make sense how it went from 3 white men to man and a woman of foreign background and I don't even believe in conspiracy theories. But false flag operations did happen in the past in many different countries, that is a fact.

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Idk. All I know is journalism is dead in America. Them going inside the house was enough proof of that. 

I don't believe in conspiracy theories but this is all way too weird. There's something going on we must not know about. Republicans are using this to strike fear into people.... that's all I'm gonna say. 

 

I'm not going crazy. :air: 

We're thinking the same then.

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

》Instead they expressed support for martyrdom using "private direct messages", 《

 

They should publish those messages. What exactly was written? In what way did  they "express support"? There needs to be more evidences about the motives.

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it really matter tho? They are Islamic Isis sympathizers/ Terrorists..... :awkney:

 

Also Im going to wait for more reports on this. Ive seen Reuters get things wrong to many times

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
1 minute ago, PoshLife said:

I'm certainly not an authority on this issue, but Reuters is not "some idiots on Twitter." They're a major news agency employing thousands of reporters across the world.

I'm referring to the "where are the three athletic men" tweets. Obviously, it was from eyewitness reports from people in a HIGHLY stressful situation....you know....where masked individuals were shooting at them, sprinklers going off, people beside them bleeding out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch

Conveniently the day after the GOP Debate where all the candidates used this as rhetoric to justify more anti-muslim anti "political correctness" (:rip:) propaganda and fear mongering :smh: 

Really curious how it took 11 days to find out "actually, they didnt pledge their support to jihad on facebook" 

Meanwhile, there have been 20+ hate crimes in these 11 days :air: 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/anti-muslim-attacks-after-san-bernardino

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

reuters article

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-security-idUSKBN0TZ27820151216

 

There is no evidence a married couple who killed 14 people in California this month were part of a terrorist cell, the head of the FBI said on Wednesday, confirming that investigators believe the pair were inspired but not directed by Islamic State.

The Islamist militant group has "revolutionized" terrorism by seeking to inspire such small-scale attacks, FBI Director James Comey said, noting the group uses social media, encrypted communications and slickly produced propaganda to recruit followers around the world.

"Your parents' al Qaeda was a very different model than the threat we face today," Comey told a counterterrorism conference in New York.

However, he said that while the perpetrators of the Dec. 2 shootings in San Bernardino, California - Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 29 - had expressed support for "jihad and martyrdom" in private communications as early as 2013, they never did so publicly on social media.

He also said authorities believe Mohammed Abdulazeez, the suspect in July's fatal shooting of four U.S. Marines and a Navy sailor in Chattanooga, Tennessee, was radicalized by militant propaganda.

"To my mind, there's no doubt that the Chattanooga killer was inspired and motivated by foreign terrorist organization propaganda," he said, but did not specify any particular group.

I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
29 minutes ago, SubRosa said:

Why are you insulting these people you disagree with?

You are telling us to blindly believe in the media, who just NOW decided to correct previous information about "facebook pledge to ISIS". 

Even if they were the killers, what was their motive? If it wasn't terrorism, it was perfectly timed for the Trump's muslim ban and the rest of the republicans' fear mongering. 

It really does not make sense how it went from 3 white men to man and a woman of foreign background and I don't even believe in conspiracy theories. But false flag operations did happen in the past in many different countries, that is a fact.

 

Because it was obviously these two individuals that murdered those 14 innocent victims and injured twenty more.

Yes, it does make sense. Someone reported three, instead of two and a media source ran with it and it went from there. I'm sure there were several reports from victims that differed. That's typical and to be expected in situations such as these. The murderers  had masks on. Looking at their hands, possibly their neck and their eye area, they weren't black...so in the US people oftentimes default to white. Most people don't report when someone's hands are  "tan" or "brown". 

The guy worked with these people, left the party early and came back with his crazy ass wife. When the police were chasing them, they were hanging out the windows, shooting and throwing pipe bombs and had an arsenal in their car and at their home. They are the murderers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
30 minutes ago, Whispering said:

Because it was obviously these two individuals that murdered those 14 innocent victims and injured twenty more.

Yes, it does make sense. Someone reported three, instead of two and a media source ran with it and it went from there. I'm sure there were several reports from victims that differed. That's typical and to be expected in situations such as these. The murderers  had masks on. Looking at their hands, possibly their neck and their eye area, they weren't black...so in the US people oftentimes default to white. Most people don't report when someone's hands are  "tan" or "brown". 

The guy worked with these people, left the party early and came back with his crazy ass wife. When the police were chasing them, they were hanging out the windows, shooting and throwing pipe bombs and had an arsenal in their car and at their home. They are the murderers. 

No one is saying they aren't the murderers though. It's just odd how the police and the media aren't reporting the truth. They all said they were ISIS sympathizers and now this comes out....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
2 hours ago, Morphine Prince said:

No one is saying they aren't the murderers though. It's just odd how the police and the media aren't reporting the truth. They all said they were ISIS sympathizers and now this comes out....

The tweets that were quoted in this thread were saying that. That's why I made my original comment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
43 minutes ago, Whispering said:

The tweets that were quoted in this thread were saying that. That's why I made my original comment. 

Oh, I thought you meant the replies here, nvm. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...