Yves 1,891 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 Not funny. They are pathetic. 40 minutes ago, Evo said: Swift’s 1989 has sold a mere 1.8 million copies this year, which is probably hard for her to swallow at this particular moment. Well, it's 1.8 million copies. Artists would kill to get those numbers. 20 minutes ago, Spock said: The hypocrisy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropico 4,145 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 "mere" goodf--kingbye ♢ Social Justice Enthusiast ♢ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBEY 57,109 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 30 minutes ago, Red said: "mere 1.8 million copies" What the **** are they talking about Just because 25 sold well it doesn't mean 1989 flopped I hate media. Since Adele sold 3 millon theyre talking like everyone does it and Taylor's numbers are atrocious mess! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaLuna 12,732 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 They obviously value numbers over anything else. If someone beat Adele's records, they'd be writing the same kind of crap about her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yves 1,891 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 56 minutes ago, PrinceGaga said: Desperate attempts to bandwagon the Taylor™ hate train to stay relevant for the gee pee Not you describing most of the GGD members. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion Heart 15,041 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 1 hour ago, Evo said: Swift’s 1989 has sold a mere 1.8 million copies this year They make it seem like these numbers are nothing. Meanwhile many top artists are struggling to cross the 1M mark. Also inb4 lawsuit ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexxx 5,647 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 BTW ha impact Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barcodemonster 3,525 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 They're probably being sarcastic scan my barcode Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enhsa 2,043 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 poor taylor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkchylde 14,857 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hola Soraya 4,355 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 1 hour ago, Morphine Prince said: They better calm down with the Taylor dissing. She is gonna $wift™ their ass. 1 hour ago, PrinceGaga said: The unnecessary mention of Taylor™ though Why are they dissing Taylor™ about sales when her album has been out for over a year? Also it has achieved extremely healthy sales this year Every other artist can dream tbh Desperate attempts to bandwagon the Taylor™ hate train to stay relevant for the gee pee ¿Tú me estás hablando en inglés? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
miju 375 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Pretty sure they're just being sarcastic and teasing Taylor since people say that she's all about her sales or whatever doseofamnesia. tumblr. com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juanjo 2,150 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Ha ARTPOP era approaches, it's inevitable, the cycle of life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaloth 87 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Please everyone STOP putting women against each other. Seriously this must end! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,915 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Wtf, 1.8 million is a lot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01.jpg.fd146ec33082b8bb453014ddf225d949.thumb.jpg.f02030b899e319cab3e762d0c1f54770.jpg)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.