ViviLittleM 3 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 The act of purchasing of an album -- whether from your computer or your local store -- has become an increasingly rare thing for folks to do. Other than a small 1.4 percent increase in album sales in 2011, every year for the past 15 years the album has been finding it harder and harder to breathe. With that in mind, the fact that Adele's 25 is already breaking 24-year-old sales records, just over halfway through its debut week, is a staggering feat. Sending her already-impressive numbers back in time, however, shows just how dramatic the singer's success really is. 25 is projected to sell 2.9 million units in its debut week, slightly above the current record of 2.4 million achieved by *NSYNC in 2000 with the release of No Strings Attached. Album sales reached their historical peak in 2000, falling 60.6 percent through last year. Although digital track sales have partially filled that void, total sales have fallen sharply. No Strings Attached was released when total music sales (albums plus digital tracks) were about 2.5 times higher than today. When comparing their different eras and sales climates, 25 handily beats No Strings Attached in terms of their respective slices of first-week music sales. Meaning: Adele's share of total music sales during 25's debut week is far greater than *NSYNC's was for No Strings Attached. Adele is on track to capture an estimated 42 percent of recorded music sales this week, considering both her album and track sales (a combined 3.15 million units when every 10 tracks are converted into one "album"). No Strings Attached grabbed a 16.7 percent share of sales in its first week of release. Another way to compare today's apples to yesterday's oranges is by adjusting for "inflation." Everything from food prices to movie revenues are regularly adjusted for shifting currency values -- for example, $100 in 1980 would go as far as $290 would today. The difference, of course, is that music sales have fallen, not risen, since 2000. Adjusting for that contraction, Adele's projected first-week sales would be equivalent to her selling 7.59 million units in 2000. It's important to note that some differences between the eras cannot be removed when comparing first-week sales. Because iTunes didn't exist in 2000, No Strings Attached didn't have the 900,000 pre-orders 25 is said to have had. Back then, when online retailers like Amazon and CD Now represented a small share of total sales, nearly all sales came from physical retailers, which would give big albums sale pricing and prominent shelf space for at least a month. Nevertheless, the music industry has not lost its enthusiasm for following first-week sales as if it were a sport. Labels and artists (ahem) desperately want to reach number one on the charts. Four-week sales may be a better way to measure albums from different eras -- but there are no bragging rights for best four-week sales period. http://www.billboard.com/articles/business/6776984/adele-25-42-percent-record-sales-7-5-million-200 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Laurent 4,862 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I'm confused didn't BTW sell like 7 million? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViviLittleM 3 Posted November 24, 2015 Author Share Posted November 24, 2015 Just now, Saint Laurent said: I'm confused didn't BTW sell like 7 million? US only. Another way to compare today's apples to yesterday's oranges is by adjusting for "inflation." Everything from food prices to movie revenues are regularly adjusted for shifting currency values -- for example, $100 in 1980 would go as far as $290 would today. The difference, of course, is that music sales have fallen, not risen, since 2000. Adjusting for that contraction, Adele's projected first-week sales would be equivalent to her selling 7.59 million units in 2000. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serendipity 7,821 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 BB's inflation/deflation thing doesn't make much sense at all to me See talent here-->http://bit.ly/2eqeUxK Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klou 2,414 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 That puts Born This Way at 5,900,000 total US sales and 18,000,000 worldwide if released in 2000. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klou 2,414 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 ARTPOP adjusted total sales: US - 1,934,000 Worldwide - 5,931,909 Cheek to Cheek: US - 1,604,000 Worldwide - 2,579,000 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Panda 7,639 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 This was a good insight. We are in the "digital era" now where singles are bought more than albums but Adele and TS have proven that depends on the artist as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel Down 2,807 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 8 minutes ago, Klou said: That puts Born This Way at 5,900,000 total US sales and 18,000,000 worldwide if released in 2000. SH*T Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterOfSpain 8,279 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Nnnn not Adele selling 8m first week in the year 2000 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 53 minutes ago, Klou said: That puts Born This Way at 5,900,000 total US sales and 18,000,000 worldwide if released in 2000. what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klou 2,414 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 2 minutes ago, JbGaga said: what? That's using the same formula Billboard used. That is assuming BTW sold 2.3 million in the US and 7 million worldwide. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Child 18,997 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I don't get the Oops I Did It Again one, it's confusing me. ‘If religion be the cause of disunity, then irreligion is surely to be preferred.’ ‘Abdu’l-Bahá Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 2 minutes ago, Klou said: That's using the same formula Billboard used. That is assuming BTW sold 2.3 million in the US and 7 million worldwide. 2 minutes ago, Klou said: That's using the same formula Billboard used. That is assuming BTW sold 2.3 million in the US and 7 million worldwide. But why? They werent put out then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Im sorry I just understood what this article is about lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JbGaga 2,261 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 3 minutes ago, Klou said: That's using the same formula Billboard used. That is assuming BTW sold 2.3 million in the US and 7 million worldwide. Im sorry I just understood what this article is about lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.