PaperIz 7,346 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 No its Not. Its called hiring an artist. but the art an artist created for a music artist to use is not art. That's what you're saying Human generated art Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpion 409 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 but the art an artist created for a music artist to use is not art. That's what you're sayingNo I didnt. Carry on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HANZ 4,380 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 I don't like itthis would slay if it was the same concept but with the grown Rihanna that we all know and love instead of one kid My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ByeBye49 161 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 Slay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 No its Not. Its called hiring an artist. by that logic Gaga also just hired the artist for ARTPOP cover?Im not saying it's my opinion, just that your messages are implying so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judas Oyster 1,915 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 I love it. Modern art. My first thought was the album cover of Yeezus. I can see she's inspired by what Kanye dares to do. + Jay-Z's Magna Carta... Holy Grail.Just look at their covers: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlitterAndGrease 594 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 this is ugly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenniferella 2,774 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 I don't like itthis would slay if it was the same concept but with the grown Rihanna that we all know and love instead of one kidBut it makes more sense this way. "I have been writing LG5 since I was 13" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow 1,582 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 GIRL BYE ! Because there is nothing artistic about that album cover other than hiring an artist to use his work. Rihanna is NOT an artist. She is a pop star. Period. Go tell Diane Warren, Jeff Koonz, Sylvia Plath, Hell... James Cameron Rihanna is an "artist". I literally cannot with this. now this is a definition of messed up negative stan blind bashing gone horribly wrong :D:D YYou do realise you just called Gaga a NOT artist as well? She didnt make her cover, costumes, fashion, styling, statues, sets, Music videos.. Well anything. Other artists did. (She may have had an opinion, so has Rihanna).EEssentially Gaga's own art is making popsongs. As she did, but even she had many other wrtiers helping + produced + ready instrumentals. So is she an artist in your mind?Ofcourse gaga is! And a great one! But so is Rihanna in her own right too...Opera singers are artists and so are classical musicians, eventhough they don't compose...Why attack another artist like this? Its childish! You don't have to like Rihanna or her album cover but stop being so hate blinded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riot Poof 2,236 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 I like it. It's much more interesting than just another pretty headshot. I'm not a woman. I'm not a man. I am something that you'll never understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpion 409 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 by that logic Gaga also just hired the artist for ARTPOP cover?Im not saying it's my opinion, just that your messages are implying so Not at all. Gaga participated in the actual art as the canvas and muse, and had a level of say in it. We know thats not the case with ri ri. Im so sorry to say lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpion 409 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 now this is a definition of messed up negative stan blind bashing gone horribly wrong :D:D YYou do realise you just called Gaga a NOT artist as well? She didnt make her cover, costumes, fashion, styling, statues, sets, Music videos.. Well anything. Other artists did. (She may have had an opinion, so has Rihanna).EEssentially Gaga's own art is making popsongs. As she did, but even she had many other wrtiers helping + produced + ready instrumentals. So is she an artist in your mind?Ofcourse gaga is! And a great one! But so is Rihanna in her own right too...Opera singers are artists and so are classical musicians, eventhough they don't compose...Why attack another artist like this? Its childish! You don't have to like Rihanna or her album cover but stop being so hate blinded. Im not. And what you said is irrelevant because she writes every single one of her screen treatments. Every single one. Gaga is an artist by every definition.Shes been theatrically trained over ten years. She took classical lessons for half her life. She went to Tisch. The only commonality she has with Rihanna is they make pop records.... which are nothing alike, and share no commonality on how they are created.Its not hate because I could care less about her. I could call Rihanna an artist in a very limited sense of the word, meaning she sings. But thats it. To compare her to Lady Gaga on any level.... is laughable. Sorry Gaga has earned it. There is a difference between real art and what the industry tells you is art. Any true artist in any sense of the word will tell you that. Go to New York tell the struggling Broadway Actors, songwriters, dancers that Rihanna makes "art" they will laugh at you . Perhaps Rihanna pointed a finger or two, maybe wrote some songs as OP mentioned. Great, its progress and im happy to recognize that. But she is a far cry from gaga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 Not at all. Gaga participated in the actual art as the canvas and muse, and had a level of say in it. We know thats not the case with ri ri. Im so sorry to say lol She participated as the canvas? what does that mean? Rih is in her photo aswell lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpion 409 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 She participated as the canvas? what does that mean? Rih is in her photo aswell lol Jeff Koonz actually used her as part of the actual art. He didnt slap something together in photoshop lol. Like I said , Im open to her growing and becoming an artist... but its a stretch. I would say the same for 90% of the pop industry. And thats ok. It is what it is. Im not here to apologize for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paper Gangsta 6,693 Posted October 9, 2015 Share Posted October 9, 2015 Jeff Koonz actually used her as part of the actual art. He didnt slap something together in photoshop lol. Like I said , Im open to her growing and becoming an artist... but its a stretch. I would say the same for 90% of the pop industry. And thats ok. It is what it is. Im not here to apologize for it. Roy didn't slap it either. He actually painted/drew rihanna using her picture from childhood as inspiration. and he didn't make art in photoshop either. You can see process here : He first made a paiting of rihanna and then did the rest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.