Lion Heart 15,041 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Added a better video. Half a billion dollars will be about $3.50 per female American. I guess that's too much. ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad 2,499 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Sure, let's let the old straight dude decide how women can/can't get medical help. ɪ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ʟᴏᴠᴇ / ɪ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ɪᴛ ꜰᴇᴇʟꜱ ʟɪᴋᴇ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink sushi 4,351 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 We really need a woman running this country.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus 1,494 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 We really need a woman running this country.... But not Hilary. It's actually misandristic to think that men can't support women's rights. Bernie Sanders is an example a guy who sticks up for minorities and has for decades. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 We really need a woman running this country.... How do you know another man wouldn't give women all the funding they need? Bernie a Sanders 2016. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman 4,660 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 How do you know another man wouldn't give women all the funding they need? Bernie a Sanders 2016.But lets shake things up and give women a chance for once. It's science, bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 But lets shake things up and give women a chance for once. I don't believe it's right for gender to be involved in choosing a candidate. In the same way we should color blind, we should be gender blind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink sushi 4,351 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 But not Hilary. It's actually misandristic to think that men can't support women's rights. Bernie Sanders is an example a guy who sticks up for minorities and has for decades. Its not just that. There have been 43 male presidents and ZERO female. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman 4,660 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 I don't believe it's right for gender to be involved in choosing a candidate. In the same way we should color blind, we should be gender blind. I mean you're right, but at the same time adding a woman into the White House would change so many political and social dynamics. Women have came so far these last 4 or 5 decades. Let's keep the progress moving. It's science, bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus 1,494 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 But lets shake things up and give women a chance for once. Its not just that. There have been 43 male presidents and ZERO female. Gender equality is not giving women a presidency because she is a woman. It's giving her the same opportunity to become president. We don't want someone who can't run the country for four years and our only reason to let her into the Oval Office is because she has a vagina. This is coming from someone who students gender criticism and is a devout feminist. Seriously tough, Hilary has been shaky about her political platform. She didn't even support same s-x marriage until recently. She has remained mostly silent about police brutality. She is not who we need. We need Bernie Sanders, not because he has a penis, but because he has fought for minorities and equality for decades. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus 1,494 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 I mean you're right, but at the same time adding a woman into the White House would change so many political and social dynamics. Women have came so far these last 4 or 5 decades. Let's keep the progress moving. Sure, having a woman in the White House would be historic and it would change social dynamics, but we need someone who is qualified. Hilary is not qualified. You need to choose the best candidate. Hilary didn't support same s-x marriage for many years and she has remained silent during important topics. Bernie Sanders actually cares and he isn't shady. Also, he would be the first Jewish president. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman 4,660 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Gender equality is not giving women a presidency because she is a woman. It's giving her the same opportunity to become president. We don't want someone who can't run the country for four years and our only reason to let her into the Oval Office is because she has a vagina. This is coming from someone who students gender criticism and is a devout feminist. Seriously tough, Hilary has been shaky about her political platform. She didn't even support same s-x marriage until recently. She has remained mostly silent about police brutality. She is not who we need. We need Bernie Sanders, not because he has a penis, but because he has fought for minorities and equality for decades. Yeah women have the oppurtunity to become president, but is there a large amount of prejudice against them? Hell yeah. In fact, I just heard some very disturbing comments about Hilary and women presidents in general today. It doesn't have to be Hilary, but I feel like she's the only woman being represented in this race by the media. There has to be more women out there who are campaigning. Let's give them a chance. It's science, bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 I mean you're right, but at the same time adding a woman into the White House would change so many political and social dynamics. Women have came so far these last 4 or 5 decades. Let's keep the progress moving. We shouldn't look at it as adding a women. We should look at is as just another candidate being added. Women have the opportunity now to become president, that's progress enough, they don't deserve special treatment in the election for their gender, that's just as wrong as denying them access Becuase of their gender IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus 1,494 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Yeah women have the oppurtunity to become president, but is there a large amount of prejudice against them? Hell yeah. In fact, I just heard some very disturbing comments about Hilary and women presidents in general today. It doesn't have to be Hilary, but I feel like she's the only woman being represented in this race by the media. There has to be more women out there who are campaigning. Let's give them a chance.I gave Hilary a chance and then I researched her. Ignoring her bad qualities because she has a vagina is s-xist. It's extremely s-xist. I am a huge feminist and I wanted Hilary to be great, but she isn't. This isn't a pageant or some fun TV show. This is the future of the country, handed over to someone for four years, and they need to be capable. Hilary is not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,772 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 But not Hilary. Agree 100%. I can see right through her. She comes off as fake. Sadly people will go in with her being a woman and being "progressive!" and will run to vote. Similar to 2008 when people rushed to vote and make racial history. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.