Jump to content
celeb

Taylor Swift posts open letter to Apple Music (And exposes them)


antpats2

Featured Posts

monsterdreams

I do find all of her anti streaming stuff a bit pretentious 

Haters gonna need more than a flashlight for my shade
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Dominikko

I understand her point, and this is not her being greedy. She just thinks it's pretty unfair because Apple earns a lot of money but they won't pay the labels, artists, and their respective teams for 3 months. But she must understand that Apple will also not be getting money during the 3-month free trial. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bellatrix

Damn! She will get a lot of money anyway.She will just have to wait 3 months...! Apple needs to make money from this as well. Not only the artist.. They need to make sure that they will get a lot of subscribers.:awkney:

That's the thing. She doesn't support streaming services at all (I don't either) so why should she give away her music for three months so Apple can collect their subscribers?

Lose control. Let go and fall. Do you get the satisfaction?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona Apple

That's the thing. She doesn't support streaming services at all (I don't either) so why should she give away her music for three months so Apple can collect their subscribers?

She DOES support streaming services. Her music is on Tidal!.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

She DOES support streaming services. Her music is on Tidal!.. 

Which is a ridiculous decision 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pure Adrenaline

*

We don’t ask you for free iPhones. Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation.

 

mess :lmao:

 

the quote of the DAY ..... this killed me :lmao:

 

It's much more fun to have hizophrenia... u never get lonely
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bellatrix

She DOES support streaming services. Her music is on Tidal!.. 

I've heard that she doesn't, but ok maybe Jay Z pays her the salary she deserves then unlike Spotify and Apple :sis:

Lose control. Let go and fall. Do you get the satisfaction?
Link to post
Share on other sites

MonsterMum

It is fair for Taylor to bring this up, if I work for months without getting paid I can't pay my mortgage.

You can call her greedy but it is what it is. We all got bills to pay and I doubt any of you would wanna work for months without a pay cheque meanwhile the company turns around and boasts about their success and how inovative they are. They would be nowhere with that streaming service if it wasn't for the artists and everyone involved that have given you the joy of that album or song. For Apple to turn around and say "thank you and now **** off" is repulsive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have considered those 3 months a small investment into something that could worked out quite well for her, but I respect her choice and her views on streaming since I'm not that much of a fan myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand her point, and this is not her being greedy. She just thinks it's pretty unfair because Apple earns a lot of money but they won't pay the labels, artists, and their respective teams for 3 months. But she must understand that Apple will also not be getting money during the 3-month free trial. 

Wasn't Apple the richest company on the planet? It's really greedy of them to refuse to pay. And even if they don't receive any money for subscriptions during this trial they still be using the artists' products (their songs) and it's not fair to ask that for free. How is this 3-month thing without paying artists even legal? Unless Apple has made individual contracts with all the labels...

I totally support Taylor on this one. And another thing - Apple intentionally won't bring their new app to Android until the end of the trial because they see a competitor in the face of Google Play Music. And Google is not a company to f**k with. 

As much as I like Apple, the way they're handling the three month trial is a disaster for small artists

FTFY.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pharamon

Whats her deal? Its normal that they wont get money for the first 3 months *facepalm*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicole

I get her point. Although I it's disappointing that up and coming artists seem to be relying on youtube/streaming/internet in general to "make it". Not everything is about money, sometimes you just need to get your music out there before you start earning $$.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona Apple

I've heard that she doesn't, but ok maybe Jay Z pays her the salary she deserves then unlike Spotify and Apple :sis:

She is just destroying her image imo. In every site I checked the comments are 90% negative..She should start appriciating the fact that she is huge at the moment instead of trying to earn more money . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have considered those 3 months a small investment into something that could worked out quite well for her, but I respect her choice and her views on streaming since I'm not that much of a fan myself.

That's true but the same argument could be used for apple, they should consider the 3 months free (which is entirely their decision) a small investment, especially when they are the richer entity. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...